Search results

Below tranquilized mountain lion with radio collar:

R.e mistaken identification of bears as Bigfoot, I don't think that is very plausible for a number of reasons, but mainly because of the way they move. They are not really that great at walking upright and their 'gate'/stride/pace/step would be close together if they walk on two legs, unlike...

All I can say for now is thanks for keeping me on the straight and narrow, I will do some thinking!

Well my premise is, if I understand what that means exactly, is that there is no 'physical' evidence of Bigfoot. Tracks are one thing, but they need to lead to something. If he was a primate, then he would be leaving all sorts of traces behind. Where as something like a ghost/spirit...

Also want some fresh prints?: SoCal woman claims she saw Bigfoot; sues California to prove it "They're on our property. They knock on our walls. They look through our windows," Not the first report like this, and if they are doing as claimed, how come they leave no trace evidence? No skin...

Here is a Bear print in 'mud': the Bigofoot print casts I have seen are never boxed/framed which is what you would have to do to capture as much information as possible. The police forensic experts would make a much better cast, maybe something similar to this: here is more about how the...

I agree a bit, obviously the impression material will have a great baring on the final result, no argument there. Plaster comes in grades of fineness and hardness (depending on intended application/use) and is not the only option, resins and other materials can be used instead, or in special...

I think it can be used like that. For example if I said: I find Bigfoot reports more incredulous than those of Yetis. It makes sense to me, but trying to explain it is a bit more complicated.

Those plaster casts are awful. I know that a lot of ancient forms of life are recognised only because of and by their trace fossils, but when you are dealing with deep time (paleontology) that is fine, it is great to have any idea about how something lived from the evidence it left behind. But...

I think he is correct in the usage of the word: incredulous: 3. (largely obsolete, now only nonstandard) Difficult to believe; incredible. [from 17th c.] incredulous - Wiktionary I don't think he is right about Bigfoot though.

From what I have seen anybody who claims to have physical evidence of a 'primate' Bigfoot is either lying or mistaken. I think it is like trying to catch a reflection or shadow. I will ask a question: If I die falling off a cliff whilst running away from a unicorn, then did the unicorn kill me?

rocket mission to check if Earth is flat rocket enthusiast is looking to blast himself into outer space to check for himself whether the Earth is flat or a globe. Flat Earth? One man's rocket mission

I don't think it is case closed at all. But I agree 100% about the fake bodies and hairs etc

Does 'Bigfoot' use tools?

Walter Bosley knows about Aeros and things like that, he might be able to help. Not sure if that one you mention was spoken about in these previous episodes: Airship | The Paracast — The Gold Standard of Paranormal Radio

It is already illegal in Skamania County (Washington) from 1969 as I understand it: http://www.skamaniacounty.org/ordinance/Bigfoot Ordinance 69-01.pdf & renewed in 1984: http://www.skamaniacounty.org/ordinance/Ord_1984-2.pdf $10k fine and up to 5 years in jail.

Great listening, thank you.

I had a similar thing and it turned out to be a 'cat scarer' : Cat repeller - Wikipedia It is supposed to be inaudible to human ears, so I think it was broken. It has since been removed thankfully. Other people have reported similar here: Garden Law Discussion • View topic - Noisey cat...

Also forgot about these two things: 'Twitter dress' in Comic Relief sale Why some people can hear this silent gif

Actually scrap that, life is invaluable.