.0 The Unified Field Theorem

[Posey Gilbert]

​

.0 The Unified Field Theorem​

Or​

Spaceail Migration, A New Way To Look At Things We Already Know.​

​

​

First written by: Posey Lee Gilbert 06/23/73.​

First published online in the original Pieces Of An Enigma 1993.​

Republished online in Temple Of The Infidel 1997.​

Updated 11/26/2011.​

​

​

​

​

To begin with I must first say that the spelling of the word Spaceail instead of Spatial is intentional for it is necessary that I use expressions of my own creation in order to explain a phenomena that I feel has been too long over looked by Physicist and Mathematicians alike.​

Spatial Migrations makes one to think of a migration of a people, plants, insects or animals into an area less crowded or confined.​

I.E. Leaving the crowded cities for the wide-open spaces of the country, or the open seas.​

Spaceail Migrations however deals with the movement of spaces within and through out all things material, from the micro to the macro, and the metamorphic changes this causes in said objects, and how this is at the bases and sole cause of all observable Quantum and physical phenomena in the known universe.​

I.E. The much sought after Unifying Field and the death knell of the Big Bang, Expanding Universe, Dark Matter Dark Energy, and Strong and Weak Force Theories.​

I only ask that those who are in the places to test my Theorem will do so and contact me on the resulting pros and cons of their findings at: [email protected]​

The basis of all that will follow is that one must understand that space, or nothingness, can be seen as both tangible, and intangible. ​

That is to say that there is a state of nothingness that is physical and another that is nonphysical.​

The tangible nothingness can be otherwise explained, as the presence of absence and this is simple to understand. ​

I am not there with you as you read these words so there is a presence of my absence in the area you are in now. ​

There are those who will say that actually I am there in the form of my thoughts that are being read now but I am talking about my physical "Not-Beingnity" or Absentia in your presence. ​

So now my absence is a physical manifestation in your presence my absence is physically there with you and can only be removed by me physically entering into that area.​

There is nothing else in all of existence that can remove you from that space of my not being there but my actual presence. ​

So the mere presence of my absence has you now sealed into the level of the universe you now occupy and there is no force with in or out of that universe that can change that. ​

The following demonstration will enable you to prove for yourself and others the actual Physiablity (the ability to be physical) of the tangible nothingness. ​

One of the most obvious properties about tangible items is their ability to be moved about in real time and space. They can be added and subtracted so too can the tangible nothingness. ​

Clear a small area on the table before you. ​

To look at that area now most people would say that there is now nothing there, we know that there is air, dust and energies present we will consider that there is nothing there. ​

Now take a pencil or any other object and place it in that space. ​

You have just done what you've been taught could not be done. ​

You have just subtracted nothing from nothing and in doing so you have just manipulated the tangible nothingness.​

This is not a mind game but a fact, and why a true vacuum cannot exist within our universe, for once the tangible nothingness is displaced, it will always be replaced by something tangible be it matter or energy.​

This applies to everything and is only used to show how physical a presence absence, or nothingness has. ​

Thus all that is, is literally built upon the frame of all that is not. ​

Before there can be one there first must be none. ​

Only because all that which could be happening now is in the process of not happening now, can that which is happening now happen. ​

​

*Please note, the not doing I use here is not the same not doing as that which is spoken of by the Nagual don Juan in Carlos Castaneda's' wonderful books that not doing is a discipline this not doing is a way of life as involuntary as a heart beat.​

​

So you see the path you set, through the cloud of possibilities not only binds you to, but also gives rise to all that we perceive in this level of universe. ​

It can be seen now how just through the action of our being we give rise to all levels the have the universe seen and unseen.​

Still before we get too big headed over our role in the creation of the universe we should remember we too are but part of the universe and so are also governed by the dictates of all else that is universe. ​

The simple path made by a falling leaf also defines the shape of the universe and where we are in it. ​

The path it makes through the cloud of possibilities also ties and binds us to our level in this universe. ​

This is but a reflection of what is seen on the quantum level.​

The clouds seen surrounding atoms are one and the same as the cloud of possibilities that surrounds all things. ​

The point that an observed electron occupies in that cloud when it is seen was dictated by the observer and dictated what the observer would see at that time it was observed. The path that is taken makes just as real all the paths not taken. ​

The tangible nothingness cannot be separated from that which is physical for it too is physical but lies hidden in the missing ninety percent of the visible universe. ​

It is the journey of this tangible nothingness on its' way back to re-intangibility that gives rise to, and is the unifying field so long searched for by the scientists of our time. ​

As stated earlier every particle in the universe is directly connected to all that came before it, and to all that does and does not come into being. ​

Just as who you are and where you are in this level of universe is solely the result of paths, or trajectories both taken and not taken by a series of quantum particles as they came rushing into our layer of the universe.​

If you could view the path that these particles took you would see endless strands of loops and tangles that seem to begin and end to restart again into and out of our levels of universe. ​

I call these strands (Phygmental) trails they are the trajectories of every possible and impossible possibility that ever happened, is happening now, ever could happen, never did happen, is not happening, and never will happen, all happening at once in one point in space and time.​

Like the digitized music tracks on a CD the symphony that is our universe is already completed from beginning to end. Every correct note played has been recorded as well as every pause and incorrect note not played.​

Even when the disc is just sitting in its' jewel case the music is beginning to play, is playing, is not playing, and has played all at the same time. ​

Until it is placed into a CD player and the unit is then activated to us there is no music. In the same way until awareness passes through one of these Phygmental trails there is no universe.​

These figments are the strands, or the super strings, that weave the tapestry of creation. ​

The strands of the paths not taken are of equal importance to the paths that are taken for they by the presence of their absence confine, define and bind the edges of this grand tapestry.​

Each of our life times if viewed through the quantum mind would also be seen to be one of the strands making up the threads of this tapestry, and so too are inseparable from the whole, anything done on one level has effectivity on all levels like a tsunami sweeping through all that is, is not, and will never be.​

With this understood we have at last found the answer to that one annoying question that plagues us all that infernal eternal: ​

"Why do things have to be the way they are?" the answer to which is: "Everything is as it should be for things to be as they are at this time. Dammit!"​

Just as we are defined, and are made who we are, by events we did and did not encounter on our trajectories through the cloud of possibilities surrounding that which we call our life time, so too the place a quantum particle does or does not occupy with in an atom defines what form that it will manifest in our level of the universe as.​

Here it can now be seen how the spaces or the presence of absence of a quantum particle defines the form that all matter will take in this level of universe. ​

Be it energy, gas, plasma, fluid, or solid the points of space (Spoints or Spaceail points) or points of 0 "Absence" is what all things are mostly made of. In other words who we aren't is what makes us who we are. ​

Likewise what things aren't more exactly defines what they are. ​

Because space is the only thing in our universe that is continuous rather than to call it points of 0 I call this tangible space point 0 and from here onwards will write it as .0. ​

When referring to the intangible nothingness I will use the term The 0, and at times simply 0.​

Of course at this time you are asking yourself and rightly so, "What the hell is this fool talking about? "Tangible nothingness, Intangible nothingness, Spoints, Sparticals, Points Of 0, Point 0, O, The 0, and soon to come Essence O. ​

Why so many words to talk about absolutely nothing? Nothing is nothing and that's all there is or isn't to that!" but bare with me you'll find this all worthwhile. ​

What is offered here is not something new but something we all know on an inner level but so far has not yet been fully conscientiously realized.​

​

To read the full article please see:​

​

.0 THE UNIFYING FIELD ​

​

​

 

[mike]

Mate......
No one knows better than i how hard it is to present a complex intellectual construct in such a way as its easily understandable to others.
In my career as an IT support person, i had to find real world analogys to describe the working of computers to people who in general looked on these new devices as almost magic in nature.
Describing a hard disk as like a styrene cup for example, you pour water in, you drink water out, it has a finate capacity thus you can fill one up so it can take no more, it can crack become corrupted so that you lose water/data.

I used this analogy many times to give "users" a real idea of how their own HDD functioned, users who otherwise had no "understanding" of how this new stuff behaved.

I honestly couldnt make much sense of whats posted above, thats not offered as an insult or even criticism, but rather a suggestion you try again with a mind to make what you want to express a little easier for us to grasp.
It will require some effort and imagination, but thats our burden in this genre.
I prefer the label clarification to "dumbing down" , no one here needs things dumbing down, but what you are trying to express needs some clarification, for me at least.

 

[Goggs Mackay]

Posey, I think I understand what you were saying - but it all comes down to the assertion that absence of anything is in fact 'presence of absence', in other words, taking a lack of something and calling that something else.
If we call 'nothing' as in absence of anything meaninful, 0. Then the absence of 'something' we can call -1 cos we are taking something taken away. Calling that absence of something taken away, something we can count, include, we can refer to including this as +1.
Because we are talking in a way about a closed system in one place that can either include something tangible or something tangible no longer present (having been removed), the states we have named can be added because we are talking about the same thing (you can add X's or add Y's but not X's and Y's together).
so if I have this right, -1 +1 =0

this only works if we count an absence of something the same as counting something tangible but give it the opposite sign. I don't know if my interpretation is correct but if it is, I'm not sure this is anything new but maybe just a way to label a philosophical argument?

As Mike says, if I don't have this right perhaps a new analogy will help. I know I have many ideas about many things, often very removed from the norm and Iwould love other people, if not to agree with me, then at least to properly understand where I am coming from, so that they may correct me, or add to my thoughts with their own, speaking the same language.
It is often the case with such non-physical concepts, that the understanding comes down to the language used to try to convey the new idea.

I am pleased that a) you do your own thinking and b) you are happy to put yourself out there for scrutiny.
Many people would be too scared to that - scared of being misunderstood, scared of being wrong etc but it's only when we are no longer scared of being wrong do we take chances with getting our thoughts out there for others to pull apart.
10/10 for effort.

 

[Posey Gilbert]

Posey, I think I understand what you were saying - but it all comes down to the assertion that absence of anything is in fact 'presence of absence', in other words, taking a lack of something and calling that something else.

If we call 'nothing' as in absence of anything meaninful, 0. Then the absence of 'something' we can call -1 cos we are taking something taken away. Calling that absence of something taken away, something we can count, include, we can refer to including this as +1.

Because we are talking in a way about a closed system in one place that can either include something tangible or something tangible no longer present (having been removed), the states we have named can be added because we are talking about the same thing (you can add X's or add Y's but not X's and Y's together).

so if I have this right, -1 +1 =0



this only works if we count an absence of something the same as counting something tangible but give it the opposite sign. I don't know if my interpretation is correct but if it is, I'm not sure this is anything new but maybe just a way to label a philosophical argument?



As Mike says, if I don't have this right perhaps a new analogy will help. I know I have many ideas about many things, often very removed from the norm and Iwould love other people, if not to agree with me, then at least to properly understand where I am coming from, so that they may correct me, or add to my thoughts with their own, speaking the same language.

It is often the case with such non-physical concepts, that the understanding comes down to the language used to try to convey the new idea.



I am pleased that a) you do your own thinking and b) you are happy to put yourself out there for scrutiny.

Many people would be too scared to that - scared of being misunderstood, scared of being wrong etc but it's only when we are no longer scared of being wrong do we take chances with getting our thoughts out there for others to pull apart.

10/10 for effort.

Yes, you partially have it, but actually this articles' point of focus is on the fact that Absence, Space, or Emptiness is a physical thing, that has two-forms, one being The Tangible Nothingness and the other being the true first element The Intangible Nonthingness.
This is the force that lies at the root of all matter and forces in the Universe; it is the driving force behind the actual Multilayering or Dimensionalizasion of the Universe.
It is the migration of Tangible Space back to Intangible Space that trigger all forces that we have come to search for with
The Unifying Field Theory or The God Particle so sought for with particle colliders.
My point is we think of space, absence, emptiness as nothing, when it actually is a physical thing and affects the physical just like any other physical thing does.
It is at the basis of all that we call matter, and energy in existence.
It is literally the creative force in all the multiple levels of the Universe.
Just as the absence of a Quantum particle changes the outcome of what manifests in the Universe.
I don't use Multiverse because there is only one Universe with many concentric levels and not many separate Universes.
It is the presence of the absence in wavelength or frequency that dictates what that wavelength frequency manifests as, the longer the pause "the more absence" the lower the wavelength or frequency and or density in matter.
The "lessening of the absence" the higher the wavelength or frequency and or density in matter.
It is the length of the pause in energy, or the absence of Quantum Particles in matter that governs what that energy or physical object manifest as, and what level of the Universe it will manifest in.
Because Absence (Physical or Tangible Space) and is fluid and seeks to be pure it seeps in to and out of all things, as it does this it physically alters or ages the matter, the fluids, the gases, the plasmas, and the energies it is seeping out of.
This migration of Absence or as I was taught to call it Spaceail Migration on its journey toward "Re-intangibility" alters the substance out of which it flows causing the phenomena that we call chemical reactions and because it leaves in small doses it manifests as microwaves or as heat in chemical reactions, and is the cause of background radiation in the day to day Universe and not some alleged Big Bang.
Because Tangible Spaces that is present in the item it occupies it coagulates as it migrates inside the matter it is flowing through it weakens that item, and this is what we know as entropy.
Being that it leaves in small doses it manifests as microwaves, heat or if it is at hyper or accelerated speeds total disintegration and atomic irradiation.
This why quantum particles are so dense, because most of the spaces in them has migrated out, or is migrating out of them at super high speeds.

Mate......
No one knows better than i how hard it is to present a complex intellectual construct in such a way as its easily understandable to others.
In my career as an IT support person, i had to find real world analogys to describe the working of computers to people who in general looked on these new devices as almost magic in nature.
Describing a hard disk as like a styrene cup for example, you pour water in, you drink water out, it has a finate capacity thus you can fill one up so it can take no more, it can crack become corrupted so that you lose water/data.

I used this analogy many times to give "users" a real idea of how their own HDD functioned, users who otherwise had no "understanding" of how this new stuff behaved.

I honestly couldnt make much sense of whats posted above, thats not offered as an insult or even criticism, but rather a suggestion you try again with a mind to make what you want to express a little easier for us to grasp.
It will require some effort and imagination, but thats our burden in this genre.
I prefer the label clarification to "dumbing down" , no one here needs things dumbing down, but what you are trying to express needs some clarification, for me at least.

Posey, I think I understand what you were saying - but it all comes down to the assertion that absence of anything is in fact 'presence of absence', in other words, taking a lack of something and calling that something else.
If we call 'nothing' as in absence of anything meaninful, 0. Then the absence of 'something' we can call -1 cos we are taking something taken away. Calling that absence of something taken away, something we can count, include, we can refer to including this as +1.
Because we are talking in a way about a closed system in one place that can either include something tangible or something tangible no longer present (having been removed), the states we have named can be added because we are talking about the same thing (you can add X's or add Y's but not X's and Y's together).
so if I have this right, -1 +1 =0

this only works if we count an absence of something the same as counting something tangible but give it the opposite sign. I don't know if my interpretation is correct but if it is, I'm not sure this is anything new but maybe just a way to label a philosophical argument?

As Mike says, if I don't have this right perhaps a new analogy will help. I know I have many ideas about many things, often very removed from the norm and Iwould love other people, if not to agree with me, then at least to properly understand where I am coming from, so that they may correct me, or add to my thoughts with their own, speaking the same language.
It is often the case with such non-physical concepts, that the understanding comes down to the language used to try to convey the new idea.

I am pleased that a) you do your own thinking and b) you are happy to put yourself out there for scrutiny.
Many people would be too scared to that - scared of being misunderstood, scared of being wrong etc but it's only when we are no longer scared of being wrong do we take chances with getting our thoughts out there for others to pull apart.
10/10 for effort.

Yes, Grasshopper, you partially have it, but as Bruce Lee said in “The Return Of The Dragon.”
"Do not look at the finger pointing at the Moon, look at the Moon the finger is pointing at."

Actually this articles' point of focus was on the fact that Tangible Absence, Space, Emptiness or Nothingness is a physical thing, and not truly "Nothing" at all.
It has two-forms, one being The Tangible Nothingness and the other being the true first element The Intangible Nonthingness.
This is the force that lies at the root of all matter and forces in the Universe.
It is the driving force behind the actual Multilayering or "Dimensionalizasion" of the Universe.
It is the migration of Tangible Space back to Intangibility that triggers and unites all the forces that Physicist quest for in their labs and is collectively known as "The Unifying Field."
It is also the very "God Particle" now sought for within particle colliders.
My point is we have been taught to think of space, absence, emptiness as nothing, when it actually is a physical thing and expresses itself physically as space, time, gravitym and is the generater of both the strong and weak forces.

It is the basis and the core of all matter, and energy.
It is literally the creative force in the multiple levels of the Universe known to many as GOD.
Like GOD it is omnipresent for there are spaces in the atoms of your body as there are spaces between the stars, planets, galaxies and the multiple levels of the universe,
Through these spaces all things are connected and made one.
Thus I call it The Alphomega when speaking of it as a force scientifically, and The Alphomegan when speaking of it in a Spiritual contex.
It is the absence of a Quantum particle that defines the outcome of what a substance may be.
Be it matter or energy manifests and where it manifests in the Universe.
I don't use Multiverse because there is only one Universe with many concentric levels and not many separate Universes.

In the Energetic realms it is the presence of the absence in wavelengths or frequency that dictates what that wavelength or frequency manifests as.
The lengthening of the pause results in a lowering the pitch of wavelength and frequency.
In the material realms the absenceing (Evacuatoin/Disolving) within Quantum Particles results in atomic restructuring, and physical transmutation, and the shifting of Mass, Density, and Weight within Matter.
The "anti-absenceing" results in a higher wavelength, or frequency while in Matter it decreases the Mass, Density, and Weight.
It is the length of the pause in energy, or the absenceing of Quantum Particles in materials their pilgrimage to "Re-intangibility" alters the substances out of which it flows causing the phenomena that we call chemical reaction that governs what that energy or physical object manifest as, and what level of the Universe it will manifest in.
Because Absence (Physical or Tangible Space) is fluid and seeks to be pure it seeps out of all things, as it does this it physically alters or ages the matter, the fluids, the gases, the plasmas, and the energies it is seeping out of.
This migration of Absence or as I was taught to call it (Spaceail Migration) is on its journey back to Intangibility and because it leaves in small doses it manifests as microwaves or as heat in chemical reactions, and is the cause of background radiation in the day to day Universe and not some left over heat from some alleged Big Bang.

The universe is not expanding TS (Tangible Space) is just migrating out of all things.
Because TS is present in all things, and SM (Spaceail Migration) is mainly a very slow and gradual process, it tends to coagulate as it migrates out of all matter its out flowing structurally weakens matter, and this is what we know as entropy.
Being that it leaves in small doses it manifests as microwaves, thus heat is often the catalyst of decay or transformation.
If it is a case of hyper or accelerated SM it can result in total disintegration of that object it is the basis of atomic irradiation, and is why quantum particles are so Massive, Dense, and Radioactive.
This is because most of the TS within the affected object have under gone HSM (Hyper Spaceail Migration) most of the TS has migrated, or is in the process of migrating out of them.
As you know by the use of particle colliders lead can be can actually be transformed into gold, but the resulting gold is too radioactive to be used.
HSM is the cause of this, for when Atoms collide as such speeds HSM occurs and total SE (Spaceail Evacuation) results.
I will end here because all of this is covered within my full article online.
I am sorry to have made this seem more complex then it needed to be.
But I am very thankful you guys took the tome to read it and give me your honest responses,