• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

9/11 truth comic book...

Forums New posts

Free episodes:

Bob Watson

Bob Watson

Paranormal Adept
yep its true they made a comic book based on the 9/11 conpericys. the book features a woman who uses a time machine to go back to 9/11 in the hope of stoping it...
its called the big lie...
here is a link to the comic book review;
http://www.usatoday.com/life/comics...ics-The-Big-Lie-asks-some-big-questions_n.htm

i will post a review of the comic once i find and read it.
seems like the truth movment has not slowed even after 10 years...
but it seems what happened on that day happened and the powers that be took advantige of the situation.
 
Angel of Ioren said:
Interestingly, the movement actually started as fiction, which is what Loose Change was initially supposed to be.
Click to expand...

911 actually started as fiction on March 4, 2001, when The Lone Gunmen television pilot aired on FOX. The plot revolved around a government conspiracy to hijack an airliner, fly it into the World Trade Center and blame it on terrorists to justify a new war of their choosing. This was 6 months before the events of September 11, 2001.

A meaningless coincidence spawned by the social consciousness of the times? It's like everyone was reading the same playbook but the President and The Secretary of State who essentially said they never had a clue such a thing had even been imagined.

Isn't that curious and thought provoking?
 
pixelsmith said:
more bullshit from Angelo.
Click to expand...

Well, Loose Change did start out as a fictional screenplay in 2003. Things Dylan Avery saw during the course of researching the story caused him to pursue it as a work of non-fiction. It's gone through some evolution over time as well. The latest version doesn't contain some of things that were in the original.
 
trainedobserver said:
Well, Loose Change did start out as a fictional screenplay in 2003. Things Dylan Avery saw during the course of researching the story caused him to pursue it as a work of non-fiction. It's gone through some evolution over time as well. The latest version doesn't contain some of things that were in the original.
Click to expand...

i stand corrected. apologies to Angelo and thanks to trainedobserver.
 
pixelsmith said:
i stand corrected. apologies to Angelo and thanks to trainedobserver.
Click to expand...

I appreciate that Pixel. I was wrong about the movement starting out as fiction though - I think it would still be there without the Loose Change filmmakers. They did bring it to the attention of many people with their movie. I sure thought it was extremely interesting when I watched it the first time, but then I watched a counter-point which I found did a good job of disproving their claims.
 
Angel of Ioren said:
I appreciate that Pixel. I was wrong about the movement starting out as fiction though - I think it would still be there without the Loose Change filmmakers. They did bring it to the attention of many people with their movie. I sure thought it was extremely interesting when I watched it the first time, but then I watched a counter-point which I found did a good job of disproving their claims.
Click to expand...

i may be wrong but i think they made an addendum with corrections to the Loose Change film.
 
pixelsmith said:
i may be wrong but i think they made an addendum with corrections to the Loose Change film.
Click to expand...

Yes, that was what I was saying. The film has been revised a couple of times if I'm not mistaken. Some of the more dodgy stuff has been removed. I think I may actually have a copy of the final version somewhere. The production values got slicker anyway.
 
That's true. I have not watched the newer version. It shouldn't affect my feelings about the film, but Jason Berman really gets on my nerves. It's like why I can't watch a Roman Polanski film, although he's much worse.
 
I finally got ahold of the comic...
SPOILERS....


a woman uses a time machine to get back to sept 6th 2001 due to "tachyon Entanglement" she arives one hour before the attacks she husltes to WTC to try to save her husband who is in a meeting...
she gets in she shows them 9/11 videios on a 2011 Ipad. they are unconvinced..dispite being impressesd by an Ipad... the next few pages talk about how she acheved time travel...
then the conspericerys fly..
1 the gov knew ahead of time
2officals canceled thier travel plans after being warned of an impending attack
3 NORAD stood down
4 bush used 9/11 to justify 2 wars (somewhat true)
5 the govement started a "noble lie" about 9/11
6 contoled demolitions were used to bring down WTC 1,2 and 7
the woman is hauled off as the men concragulate them selves. one sells his microsoft stock for apple as the plane comes in...
he wakes to find the office in ruins the womans husband holds the Ipad and says she was real and points out hidden contoled demolitions....
all in all a whos who of 9/11 therorys...
 
Back
Top