• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

Air Travel in 2050

Free episodes:

Tyger

Paranormal Adept
Air Travel in 2050! Check out the link to see some prototypes - like the 'Blended Wing' aircraft that looks very much like a 'Triangle' UFO.

What Commercial Aircraft Will Look Like In 2050
November 13, 2014 | by Ashley Dove-Jay
LINK: What Commercial Aircraft Will Look Like In 2050 | IFLScience

TEXT: "The aircraft industry is expecting a seven-fold increase in air traffic by 2050, and a four-foldincrease in greenhouse gas emissions unless fundamental changes are made. But just how “fundamental” will those changes need to be and what will be their effect on the aircraft we use?

"The crucial next step towards ensuring the aircraft industry becomes greener is the full electrification of commercial aircraft. That’s zero CO2 and NOx emissions, with energy sourced from power stations that are themselves sustainably fuelled.
The main technological barrier that must be overcome is the energy density of batteries, a measure of how much power can be generated from a battery of a certain weight.

"Tesla CEO Elon Musk has said that once batteries are capable of producing 400 Watt-hours per kilogram, with a ratio of power cell to overall mass of between 0.7-0.8, an electrical transcontinental aircraft becomes “compelling”.

" Given that practical lithium-ion batteries were capable of achieving energy-densities of113Wh/kg in 1994, 202Wh/kg in 2004, and are now capable of approximately 300Wh/kg, it’s reasonable to assume that they will hit 400Wh/kg in the coming decade.

"Another aspect is the exponential fall in the cost of solar panels, which have already become the cheapest form of power in most US states. The expected 70% reduction in cost of lithium-ion batteries by 2025, and the rapid rise seen in the cost of kerosene-based jet fuel means that there will be a large and growing disparity in the costs of running aircraft that will greatly favour electrification. As is often the case, the reasons that will slow transition are not technological, but are rooted in the economic and political inertia against overturning the status-quo.

"Biofuels while we wait

"Considering the average service-life of passenger and freight aircraft are around 21 and 33 years respectively, even if all new aircraft manufactured from tomorrow were fully electric, the transition away from fossil-fuelled aircraft would take two to three decades.

"In the meantime, biofuel offers carbon emissions reductions of between 36-85%, with the variability depending on the type of land used to grow the fuel crops. As switching from one fuel to another is relatively straightforward, this is a low-hanging fruit worth pursuing before completely phasing out combustion engines.

"Even though a biofuel-kerosene jet fuel blend was certified in 2009, the aircraft industry is in no hurry to implement change. There are minor technological hurdles and issues around scaling up biofuel production to industrial levels, but the main constraint is price – parity with fossil fuels is still ten years away.

"The adoption of any new aircraft technology – from research, to design sketches, to testing and full integration – is typically a decade-long process. Given that the combustion engine will be phased out by mid-century, it would seem to make more economic and environmental sense to innovate in other areas: airframe design, materials research, electric propulsion design and air traffic control.

"Bringing aircraft to life

"As we can see, we are living in a world of exponential change in technology. We need to step out of our linear day-to-day thinking to fully conceive and make use of what we have to shape the future.

"In terms of the cost of computational power, computer technology is advancing more each hour today than it did in its entire first 90 years. With this in mind we can project that the equivalent of a US$1,000 computer today will by 2023 be more powerful than the potential brainpower of a human and, by 2045, will surpass the brainpower equivalent to all human brains combined.

"The miniaturisation of digital electronics over the past half-century has followed a similar exponential trend, with the size of transistor gates reducing from approximately 1,000 nanometres in 1970 to 23 nanometres today. With the advent of transistors made of graphene showing great promise, this is expected to fall further to about 7 nanometres by 2025. By comparison, a human red blood cell is approximately 6,200-8,200 nanometres wide.

"Putting together this increase in computational power and decrease in circuit size, and adding in the progress made with 3D-printing, at some point in the next decade we will be able to produce integrated computers powerful enough to control an aircraft at the equivalent of the cellular level in near real-time – wireless interlinking of nano-scale digital devices.

"Using a biologically-inspired digital “nervous system” with receptors arranged over the aircraft sensing forces, temperatures, and airflow states could drastically improve the energy efficiency of aircraft, when coupled to software and hardware mechanisms to control or even change the shape of the aircraft in response.

"Chopping the tail

"Once electric aircraft are established, the next step will be to integrate a gimballed propulsion system, one that can provide thrust in any direction. This will remove the need for the elevators, rudders, and tailplane control surfaces that current designs require, but which add significant mass and drag.

"The wings we are already designing are near their peak in terms of aerodynamic efficiency, but they still do no justice to what nature has achieved in birds. Aircraft design templates are a century old – constrained by the limitations of the day then, but technology has since moved on. We no longer need to build wings as rigid structures with discrete control surfaces, but can turn to the natural world for inspiration. As Richard Feynman said: "I think nature’s imagination is so much greater than man’s, she’s never going to let us relax." "
 
Tygers post is full of nonsense imo, not tyger himself, he just posted what he thinks is good read, but if we can build electric planes etc etc, gotta ask yourself why ?.

At most they become fore-runners to, miniturised personal family transport unit, automated freight units etc etc

I mean the whole thrust of the article is about power to weight ratio's, miniturisation, so pray tell me WHO will want to fly on crowded public transport, when by then minaturisation would have made our own personal transport quite capable of flying us from our driveway to New york or paris, or where, ever we want to go, with computing so powerful, its completely idiot proof.

Its no more an advanced thought than electric planes with super computing, build and electric airliner, with all around thrust and balance as above [ a living skin as in the article quoted], and miniturise it to a family unit, take off from your garden land in a ''''car'''' park.

I mean even without personal transport in the picture, airports will be dotted everywhere, i mean literally everywhere tops of office blocks etc etc, anywhere convenient, because electric planes dont need runways, planes become the new 'buses' and 'trains', just as trains and bus's became the new coach and horses.


How hard can it be.

 
Last edited:
Excellent article and look forward to the day not flying in a cigar filled tank . Hope the days of fossil fuels will be the thing of the past and now just stopping folks getting thrombosis and jet lag.

Agree. :( I so dislike flying now. It long since lost it's appeal and 'romance'.

The 'Blended Wing' design has me mightily intrigued - is that interior space? Could one walk around in there? Have one's own cabin room? Bed! :)

Advances in this realm would impact leaving earth's gravity, which presently is so expensive and dangerous. Exciting possibilities. Being alive in 2050 to see it all is an outside chance for me. Makes me want to be around to see all the changes that will be accomplished. I have some hunches.
 
Back
Top