• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

Aliens/craft caught on tape

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mindsky
  • Start date Start date
Forums New posts

Free episodes:

M

Mindsky

Guest
Below are some links to some pages that deal with a new repeated abductee case in which some video was taken.

I have seen some stills of the alledged aliens, and I'm far from impressed. However, I think this case will be one in which is heavily discussed in the near future.

Here is an interview with the reported abductee
Paula Thorneycroft

Info. from rense.com
http://www.rense.com/general73/str.htm


Stills:
http://www.eccenova.com/ThorneycroftFF.htm

http://www.eccenova.com/ThorneycroftES_Stills.htm
 
Unimpressive. You know, in one of the shows, Gene (I think) mentioned that the aliens, if they exist, would be tracking our tech level and realize we can now detect them more easily. I wonder if this is why when you look back at photos of alleged ufos from the 20s-60s they are clear, visable objects which appear to have shape and mass. Nowadays, all we ever seem to get is blurry, pixellated garbage or indistinct points of light against a black sky.

So, on one level it gives some credence to Gene's comments (again, I'm sorry if it was David). On the other it suggests that perhaps back in the day when photographic techniques were more primitive and subject to less scrutiny, ufo photos were easier to fake.

Which begs the question: Is there actually any REAL evidence ANYWHERE? Or are we down to hearsay and blurry, pixelated photos?
 
UFO magazine had asked me to look at those images from Paula Thornycroft, and to say that I was not impressed is the understatement of the year. Blurry blobs of indistinct color are pretty far from compelling, IMO, and the contextual story she spins is just not credible. I had not seen that video - thanks for the link, Mindsky - it's amazing to see what people will accept as evidence.

It really underscores the sad state of this field, that folks consider this weak junk to even be mildly interesting.
 
The link to the vid is new. It wasn't available at the time this thread was made. For those who may have missed it then, here is a direct link to it.

 
David Biedny said:
UFO magazine had asked me to look at those images from Paula Thornycroft, and to say that I was not impressed is the understatement of the year. Blurry blobs of indistinct color are pretty far from compelling, IMO, and the contextual story she spins is just not credible. I had not seen that video - thanks for the link, Mindsky - it's amazing to see what people will accept as evidence.

It really underscores the sad state of this field, that folks consider this weak junk to even be mildly interesting.
Click to expand...

Hey, if Jeff Rense publicizes it, you'll be hard-pressed to demonstrate its paucity. Folks take him for gospel.

The UFO field is in desperate need of critical thinking skills. The longer nonsense like this footage is entertained and actively promoted, the more foolish legitimate interest in UFOs looks to the media and outside observers.
 
I don't think there's going to be much talk about this.

Can we move on to something credible, please? Any more discussion about this is just what these people want. Generate controversy about some idiot's hoax.

Hey, guys, if I film a really disinteresting hoax, and put it up on YouTube, can I be a guest on the Paracast?
 
gilbavel said:
I don't think there's going to be much talk about this.

Can we move on to something credible, please? Any more discussion about this is just what these people want. Generate controversy about some idiot's hoax.

Hey, guys, if I film a really disinteresting hoax, and put it up on YouTube, can I be a guest on the Paracast?
Click to expand...


Move on if you want. I'm still interested in the case.
 
We're talking about the long shot of a fuzzy light that we can't tell what it is, and zooms in and out, without any point of reference in the frame, right?

I realize that describes most UFO films, but if you've seen the above link, you'll know what I'm talking about.
 
I'm the one who posted the links, so yes I've seen the vids and stills and listened to the interview with Thorneycroft. I am Mindsky the Op btw.

Again, move on if you wish.
 
Haven't seen the stills or the interview. The video looked like rubbish to me, but perhaps the interview is persuasive. I'll give it a go and see if I was being too quick to judge.
 
Back
Top