NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

Reply to thread

Message

I think for anyone willing to look at physical evidence present right now on the Earth and look at it with an open mind and not through the history taught to us, would have to agree at the very least, accepted human history is incomplete if not just wrong to a large degree.
On most continents there is evidence that seems to pre-date the accepted history and there is a history of such evidence just being ignored or actually suppressed.

If one accepts that a lot of taught history is incorrect and evidence of things to the contrary is suppressed or ignored, you have to ask why is that the case? Science is supposed to be open enquiry into the unknown but often it is more an effort to reinforce accepted theories.

I think the reason such things are suppressed is that they endanger certain institutions and the status quo to such a degree that otherwise honest people are willing to lie to not rock the boat. That is completely un-scientific, it is dishonest and it is morally wrong in my view.

Do I need to name the institutions that seem to be threatened by evidence of older human civilisations?

<blockquote data-quote="Goggs Mackay" data-source="post: 130467" data-attributes="member: 4654">I think for anyone willing to look at physical evidence present right now on the Earth and look at it with an open mind and not through the history taught to us, would have to agree at the very least, accepted human history is incomplete if not just wrong to a large degree.On most continents there is evidence that seems to pre-date the accepted history and there is a history of such evidence just being ignored or actually suppressed.&nbsp;If one accepts that a lot of taught history is incorrect and evidence of things to the contrary is suppressed or ignored, you have to ask why is that the case? Science is supposed to be open enquiry into the unknown but often it is more an effort to reinforce accepted theories.&nbsp;I think the reason such things are suppressed is that they endanger certain institutions and the status quo to such a degree that otherwise honest people are willing to lie to not rock the boat. That is completely un-scientific, it is dishonest and it is morally wrong in my view.&nbsp;Do I need to name the institutions that seem to be threatened by evidence of older human civilisations?<img src="/forum/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/wink.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" data-shortname=";)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Goggs Mackay, post: 130467, member: 4654"] I think for anyone willing to look at physical evidence present right now on the Earth and look at it with an open mind and not through the history taught to us, would have to agree at the very least, accepted human history is incomplete if not just wrong to a large degree. On most continents there is evidence that seems to pre-date the accepted history and there is a history of such evidence just being ignored or actually suppressed. If one accepts that a lot of taught history is incorrect and evidence of things to the contrary is suppressed or ignored, you have to ask why is that the case? Science is supposed to be open enquiry into the unknown but often it is more an effort to reinforce accepted theories. I think the reason such things are suppressed is that they endanger certain institutions and the status quo to such a degree that otherwise honest people are willing to lie to not rock the boat. That is completely un-scientific, it is dishonest and it is morally wrong in my view. Do I need to name the institutions that seem to be threatened by evidence of older human civilisations?;) [/QUOTE]

Verification