• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

'America is a bomb waiting to explode'

Free episodes:

Christopher O'Brien

Back in the Saddle Aginn
Staff member
'America is a bomb waiting to explode'
By Sam Gerrans/ Freelance writer

ARTICLE HERE:

The United States is in decline. While not all major shocks to the system will be devastating, when the right one comes along, the outcome may be dramatic. Not all explosives are the same. We all know you have to be careful with dynamite. Best to handle it gently and not smoke while you’re around it.
Semtex is different. You can drop it. You can throw it. You can put it in the fire. Nothing will happen. Nothing until you put the right detonator in it, that is. To me, the US – and most of the supposedly free West – increasingly looks like a truck being systematically filled with Semtex.

But it’s easy to counter cries of alarm with the fact that the truck is stable – because it’s true: you can hurl more boxes into the back without any real danger. Absent the right detonator, it is no more dangerous than a truckload of mayonnaise. But add the right detonator and you’re just one click away from complete devastation.

We can see how fragile the U.S. is now by considering just four tendencies.

1. Destruction of farms and reliable food source
The average American is a long way from food when the shops are closed.
The Washington Post reports that the number of farms in the country has fallen by some 4 million from more than 6 million in 1935 to roughly 2 million in 2012.

And according to the College of Agriculture & Life Sciences, only about 2 percent of the US population live on farms.
That means that around 4.6 million people currently have the means to feed themselves.

Food supply logistics are extended, sometimes stretching thousands of miles. The shops have nothing more than a few days’ stock. A simple break in that supply line would clear the shops out in days.

2. Weak economic system

The American economic system is little more than froth. The US currency came off the gold standard in 1933 and severed any link with gold in 1971. Since then, the currency has been essentially linked to oil, the value of which has been protected and held together by wars.

The whole world has had enough of the US and its hubris – not least the people of the US themselves, which the massive support currently for Putin’s decision to deal with ISIS demonstrates. Since pro-active war is what keeps the US going, if it loses the monopoly on that front, its decline is inevitable.

Fiat economies always collapse. They last on average for 37 years. By that metric the US should have already run out of gas.
Once people wake up and smell the Yuan, the Exodus out of the dollar will be unstoppable.

3. Americans increasingly on mind-altering drugs

According to the Scientific American, use of antidepressants among the US population was up 400 percent in the late 2000s over the 1990s. Many of these drugs are selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.
These are the type of FDA-approved narcotics lone gunmen are frequently associated with, and their psychoses often attributed to a forced or sudden withdrawal from such drugs.
Pharmaceuticals are produced at centralized points by companies which themselves rely on extended logistics systems both to produce and to deliver their output. If the logistics system fails, there’s no more supply.

4. Morals in decline

During the objective hardship of the 1930s, there was surprisingly little crime. People were brought up with a conception of morals and right and wrong. Frugality and prudence were prized virtues. Communities were generally fairly cohesive.

Relative to then, society today is undisciplined, unrealistic and selfish.
Around 250 million shoppers participated in the Black Friday sales in 2013 in which around USD 61 billion was spent on consumer items – up roughly 100 percent on 2006 figures.

Stampedes and even murders are not uncommon each year with people openly fighting each other over reduced-price items. The goods bought in such sales tend to be non-essential and many of them are bought on credit cards which then have to be paid off at interest.

Part of the problem in what I have outlined above is that there is little explicit tension. Sure, it is depressing, vulgar and immoral. But it doesn’t look catastrophic. It looks normal.
My point is that just because US – and many other countries organised after the same template – do not look explosive, doesn’t mean they won’t blow up.
Whereas 80 years ago we could absorb major shocks, today we cannot.

Nowhere to run
In the past, people were in rural communities. They could grow food. They had real communities. They also had self-control and a conception of morality.
Today, if the supply lines go down, you are stuck in a house you can’t heat surrounded by millions of FDA-approved drug addicts who are going psycho because they have run out of juice and people who would murder their own grandmother to get a cut-price iPhone.

I would argue that the right shock event – or combination of shock events – will detonate the explosive. REST OF ARTICLE HERE:
 
Wow - that's a depressing article Chris, but sadly I think it hits the nail on the head.

I've been echoing some of those concerns outlined recently. I thought a lot of my rants were due to getting older lol (I'm 42)

Point number 4 has been one of my recent rants. Narcissism in society seems to be at an all time high.

We even had "Black Friday" here in Scotland last year!! oh please! ...
 
Wow - that's a depressing article Chris, but sadly I think it hits the nail on the head.

I've been echoing some of those concerns outlined recently. I thought a lot of my rants were due to getting older lol (I'm 42)

Point number 4 has been one of my recent rants. Narcissism in society seems to be at an all time high.

We even had "Black Friday" here in Scotland last year!! oh please! ...
Totally agree.I'm glad I'm nearer 50 than 20 I can see really tough times ahead.
 
That article reminded me of a guy I once worked with. He liked to live high on the hog. He would fly out to Las Vegas for weekend trips. I know he had 4 or 5 credit cards maxed out.

I once asked him how he was planning to pay for all that fun and games. He said he wasn't. He would pay the minimal monthly balance on his credit cards. Once he died it would be on the tax payer, you and me, to pay off his debt.

There have to be millions of people living way beyond their means just like this guy. One day the house of cards is going to collapse.
 
Last edited:
That article reminded me of a guy I once worked with. He liked to live high on the hog. He would fly out to Las Vegas for weekend trips. I know he had 4 or 5 credit cards maxed out.

I once asked him how he was planning to pay for all that fun and games. He said he wasn't. He would pay the minimal monthly balance on his credit cards. Once he died it would be on the tax payer, you and me, to pay off his debt.
Thing is, it's not 'the government' that pays - it's one's relatives, however distant. Parents, children, then brothers, sisters, then aunts and uncles - and outward it goes until a viable person is found whose wages will be garnished or estate confiscated. :( Dying with personal debt simply means the debt is passed on to one's heirs.
There have to be millions of people living way beyond their means just like this guy. One day the house of cards is going to collapse.
It has already collapsed, a few times.
 
Point number 4 reminds me of what people claim London was like in the Blitz, it is often said that people looked out for each other and you could leave your front door unlocked, however if you have talked frankly to people who lived through it, they will tell you that criminal gangs used to burgle houses when an Air raid was in progress (because the home owners would be sheltering underground) There was also a huge black market etc.

My feeling is that people are the same as they have always been.


"4. Morals in decline

During the objective hardship of the 1930s, there was surprisingly little crime. People were brought up with a conception of morals and right and wrong. Frugality and prudence were prized virtues. Communities were generally fairly cohesive.
"

VS

(#A) The Great Depression brought a rapid rise in the crime rate as many unemployed workers resorted to petty theft to put food on the table. Suicide rates rose, as did reported cases of malnutrition. Prostitution was on the rise as desperate women sought ways to pay the bills. Health care in general was not a priority for many Americans, as visiting the doctor was reserved for only the direst of circumstances. Alcoholism increased with Americans seeking outlets for escape, compounded by the repeal of prohibition in 1933. Cigar smoking became too expensive, so many Americans switched to cheaper cigarettes

&

(#B) During the Great Depression, crime flourished, and while many criminals found imprisonment and punishment, some found opportunity and even success.

&

(#C) It is seen as a time of great poverty across the nation that forced many Americans into unemployment and poor health. As a result, many Americans resorted to crime as a means of bettering themselves and their economic situation. Theft, prostitution, and alcohol related crime began to increase with the recession


Regarding: "Relative to then, society today is undisciplined, unrealistic and selfish."

All I can say about this is that: Segregation along racial lines was happening openly in parts of the US, and that does not seem like a fair or moral society to me.
I am not trying to pretend racism has gone away, I am just pointing out that it is not a very good comparison, if anything society is possibly slightly better today.
I won't pretend that I am not horrified by what I see in the media, but it does not represent what me and my friends value.

Also I want to add that I am not singling the US out, Great Britain was equally immoral in its behaviour, not to mention Japan, Russia, China, France, Germany, Italy etc. Like I said before I don't think people are any better or worse than before.

People have been predicting the end of the world since the beginning, when I was a child it was the threat of all out nuclear war, today it is self destruction.

People are Yahoos and Morlocks, but they are our Morlocks and Yahoos, so you can't criticise them without criticising your self. Society is made up of individuals, and you are one of them. society is you, and you are society, warts and all.

America is a shining light of hope in a very dark world, obviously it is very, very far from perfect, but it is Eden when compared to the evil tyranny that so many people live under.
I am in no way trying to gloss over the very real problems that people face on a daily basis in the US, but I know from talking directly to people who have had to leave their homeland to seek refuge in the UK: that things are a million times worse in other countries.

All that said: things could be better, but we have to work together, writing people off is always a mistake in my opinion.
I still believe in the idea of America, but as an outsider looking in, my opinion is only of limited value.



(#A) (source): Social and Cultural Effects of the Depression [ushistory.org]
(#B) (source): Crime in Seattle
(#C) (source): https://www.lycoming.edu/schemata/pdfs/Marshall_ECON236.pdf
 
The author rattled off a handful of points some of which have be in evidence for some time depending on who you asked, what he did neglect to mention will be (in my opinion) the biggest chunk of kindling and that is the growing divide between the rich and poor and no middle class. It's this condition which empowers people like Trump and explains why his popularity doesn't really show much evidence in declining and by February or so we will be getting to the real deal. This divide may also explain on why a self declared socialist like Sanders is attracting a number of conservatives who may be turned off by Donalds shenanigans. With Donalds presence the scapegoating and prosecuting of people without a voice and without power could be the blasting cap to set off the semtex.
 
If we do shoot ourselves in the foot it will make it that much easier for the aliens in Dr. Jacob's book to apply the coup de grace

I wonder if they ever saw The Monsters are due on Maple Street
 
Thing is, it's not 'the government' that pays - it's one's relatives, however distant. Parents, children, then brothers, sisters, then aunts and uncles - and outward it goes until a viable person is found whose wages will be garnished or estate confiscated. :( Dying with personal debt simply means the debt is passed on to one's heirs.

It has already collapsed, a few times.
I did not say that the government pays delinquent credit card debt but average humans like you and me that have to pay the freight.
 
'America is a bomb waiting to explode'
By Sam Gerrans/ Freelance writer

ARTICLE HERE:

The United States is in decline. While not all major shocks to the system will be devastating, when the right one comes along, the outcome may be dramatic. Not all explosives are the same. We all know you have to be careful with dynamite. Best to handle it gently and not smoke while you’re around it.
Semtex is different. You can drop it. You can throw it. You can put it in the fire. Nothing will happen. Nothing until you put the right detonator in it, that is. To me, the US – and most of the supposedly free West – increasingly looks like a truck being systematically filled with Semtex.

But it’s easy to counter cries of alarm with the fact that the truck is stable – because it’s true: you can hurl more boxes into the back without any real danger. Absent the right detonator, it is no more dangerous than a truckload of mayonnaise. But add the right detonator and you’re just one click away from complete devastation.

We can see how fragile the U.S. is now by considering just four tendencies.

1. Destruction of farms and reliable food source
The average American is a long way from food when the shops are closed.
The Washington Post reports that the number of farms in the country has fallen by some 4 million from more than 6 million in 1935 to roughly 2 million in 2012.

And according to the College of Agriculture & Life Sciences, only about 2 percent of the US population live on farms.
That means that around 4.6 million people currently have the means to feed themselves.

Food supply logistics are extended, sometimes stretching thousands of miles. The shops have nothing more than a few days’ stock. A simple break in that supply line would clear the shops out in days.

2. Weak economic system

The American economic system is little more than froth. The US currency came off the gold standard in 1933 and severed any link with gold in 1971. Since then, the currency has been essentially linked to oil, the value of which has been protected and held together by wars.

The whole world has had enough of the US and its hubris – not least the people of the US themselves, which the massive support currently for Putin’s decision to deal with ISIS demonstrates. Since pro-active war is what keeps the US going, if it loses the monopoly on that front, its decline is inevitable.

Fiat economies always collapse. They last on average for 37 years. By that metric the US should have already run out of gas.
Once people wake up and smell the Yuan, the Exodus out of the dollar will be unstoppable.

3. Americans increasingly on mind-altering drugs

According to the Scientific American, use of antidepressants among the US population was up 400 percent in the late 2000s over the 1990s. Many of these drugs are selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.
These are the type of FDA-approved narcotics lone gunmen are frequently associated with, and their psychoses often attributed to a forced or sudden withdrawal from such drugs.
Pharmaceuticals are produced at centralized points by companies which themselves rely on extended logistics systems both to produce and to deliver their output. If the logistics system fails, there’s no more supply.

4. Morals in decline

During the objective hardship of the 1930s, there was surprisingly little crime. People were brought up with a conception of morals and right and wrong. Frugality and prudence were prized virtues. Communities were generally fairly cohesive.

Relative to then, society today is undisciplined, unrealistic and selfish.
Around 250 million shoppers participated in the Black Friday sales in 2013 in which around USD 61 billion was spent on consumer items – up roughly 100 percent on 2006 figures.

Stampedes and even murders are not uncommon each year with people openly fighting each other over reduced-price items. The goods bought in such sales tend to be non-essential and many of them are bought on credit cards which then have to be paid off at interest.

Part of the problem in what I have outlined above is that there is little explicit tension. Sure, it is depressing, vulgar and immoral. But it doesn’t look catastrophic. It looks normal.
My point is that just because US – and many other countries organised after the same template – do not look explosive, doesn’t mean they won’t blow up.
Whereas 80 years ago we could absorb major shocks, today we cannot.

Nowhere to run
In the past, people were in rural communities. They could grow food. They had real communities. They also had self-control and a conception of morality.
Today, if the supply lines go down, you are stuck in a house you can’t heat surrounded by millions of FDA-approved drug addicts who are going psycho because they have run out of juice and people who would murder their own grandmother to get a cut-price iPhone.

I would argue that the right shock event – or combination of shock events – will detonate the explosive. REST OF ARTICLE HERE:

Very nice post Chris.

I would say not only is the system explosive and unstable it is now only a matter of time.... it is a when not an if it all goes bang.
 
I would say not only is the system explosive and unstable it is now only a matter of time.... it is a when not an if it all goes bang.
Nope. disagree. :) We aren't even close to the meltdown that was happening in the 1960's - with political assassinations, riots in the streets, cities burning down amid pretty violent demonstrations. There have been other times that were far more toe-curling - like during the Union organizing times when conditions of the workforce were savage, and the suffragette movement - not to mention the Civil War.

We are actually becoming a far more tolerant society, embracing a far more diverse population. We have more going for us than countries new to immigration and cultural diversity. Lynchings are rare if not outright no more. Hate groups like the Ku Klux Klan are no longer secret and wielding supreme terrorizing control over whole swaths of population. Do problems exist? Yes - they're just new problems (like the corporatized prison system). Women still have a ways to go but it is nothing like the chokehold society had on a woman's role in the 1950's and before. People of color are making significant strides in education and monetary gains - a real Middle Class of high achievement and distinction is growing.

If we can break the stranglehold the corporations have upon our government currently we will be okay. The US economy is huge. It will take far more to throw it to the ground, though the the current lot in Congress are doing their best to ransack and pillage the nation's vaults. We'll turn it around eventually.
 
I would suggest that we have become a nation of zombies. Most people are caught up in their smartphones, television and such. We have become anesthetized to our surroundings.

To paraphrase former co-host David Biedny, people won't be moved to action unless they haven't eaten in a few days time.
 
I would suggest that we have become a nation of zombies. Most people are caught up in their smartphones, television and such. We have become anesthetized to our surroundings.

To paraphrase former co-host David Biedny, people won't be moved to action unless they haven't eaten in a few days time.

I agree with this totally except the part about "becoming zombies" I think people always were.

There is an expression: "Nero Fiddled While Rome Burned" today it would be something like "Nero updated his facebook status while Rome burned".
 
I agree with this totally except the part about "becoming zombies" I think people always were.

There is an expression: "Nero Fiddled While Rome Burned" today it would be something like "Nero updated his facebook status while Rome burned".
I think it's more about the status quo. One will always find people who are content to 'go along' - and many more who struggle to such an extent that 'going along' is the least of their worries. But by the same token, one will always find a percentage who will rebel against that status quo, or who will want to revise or re-inspire founding principles, or are just plain activists of one kind or another. I grew up among activists, and a family that was politically aware. Being civically responsible was a given. Volunteerism was alive and well.

There could be resistance from the status quo, to blithe ignorance - but the activists were always there.

I am reminded of the 'problem' as far back as the Revolutionary War. That George Washington was able to maintain his army at Valley Forge was a triumph of the man in the face of recruits who were not always 'on board', and were far from 'patriotic' - the comfort of the world of the status quo versus the discomfort of the world of the activists - they stayed for Washinton, the man. Idealism is so much 'airy lightenings'. Much better the comfort of a warm bed, a hot fire and good food inside - rather than rain and snow and starvation for an Ideal.
 
This is an example of activism in this (internet) world, and this documentary doesn't even tell the whole story, mainly because the story of anonymous has continued. We have evidence that they monitored the last presidential election and blocked Obama's defeat via computer shenanigans by Karl Rove's people. Have you heard that? I will try to find those relevant links, but in the meantime, here is this documentary - covering activism up to about 2011 (I think) from the internal evidence.

How Anonymous Hackers Changed the World | Full Documentary HD
TEXT: "Published on Apr 26, 2015"
 
There was Julian Assange and Wikileaks, and Bradley Manning - and then Edward Snowdon after the US 2012 Presidential election, which the following video addresses. I see few 'zombies' - quite the reverse: I see activism of many stripes, not all good btw. There is activism for the good, as well as activism for the not-good.

Did Anonymous Save the Election from Karl Rove? (Part 1)
TEXT: "Published on Nov 20, 2012: Remember on election night - when Karl Rove questioned Fox News' call that Ohio had gone for President Obama? Well it turns out hacker group extraordinaire Anonymous may have had something to do with that...or did he (or she)?"


I present Part 2 of the above because it is interesting. The further past is no better. We have a checkered past when it comes to presidential elections, when candidates were usually chosen in 'smoke-filled backrooms' as the phrase went, and within raucous conventions where deals were made. Now all that happens in other ways. My point is we are not pristine. We have a lot of history that is far from 'pure'. The populace has usually been kept in the dark about a lot.

Why it's not crazy to think Anonymous stopped Karl Rove From Stealing the Election, Part 2
TEXT: "Published on Nov 21, 2012: If you think it's crazy that Karl Rove tried to steal the election this year only to be thwarted by Anonymous - then you haven't been paying attention to the last 50 years of American history. Tune in...what do Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, both Bushes, and maybe even Mitt Romney have in common - besides all being Republicans?"
 
Back
Top