• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

Bigfoot Photo New...

Free episodes:

This just goes to show us all how messed up humans are, they'd probably kill it on site.

LOL! They didn't have a chance to kill this one as the cam was out there all by itself and they had no idea the pic was captured on digital until some time after. Seems that this "Bigfoot" female was looking for some tasty apples?

---------- Post added at 12:23 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:22 AM ----------

Bear with mange.

Shoulders are wrong....someone said it was an owl.
 
"Bear with mange" is actually something of a standard joke in some parts of the Bigfoot enthusiast community. I forget where it started but it may well have been a trailcam shot of a mangy bear. Soon every blobsquatch would be identified as a bear with mange by some smart ass commenter. Just trying to uphold tradition. :)
 
Here is the link to the Bruce Maccabee's analysis of the photos.

Vermont Trail Cam Picture

Too technical for me; maybe someone would like to translate. Particularly confusing was the explanation for a time discrepancy on the camera time/date stamp, something to do with weather and moon phases.
 
To me it looks like a fake. These kind of photos emerge every once in a while just to keep the Bigfoot theme alive. So many years have gone by and the evidence for this being's existence is as thin as it was in the beginning. My question is: if Bigfoot lives in the wild tracts of North America, and there would be a population of at least a few hundreds to justify its survival, why hasn't one been found yet? They may be more intelligent than most animals, but some of them have to face accidental deaths (falling down a cliff, sudden disease, drowning in a lake or river, etc). It's unbelievable that through all these years no Bigfoot carcass or skeleton, resulting from any of those unpredictable events, has yet been recovered. To me that indicates that Bigfoot is just a myth, like so many in cryptozoology. There are countless lifeforms that haven't been discovered by man, specially in the vastness of the oceans, but the existence of an unknown land animal of such size is virtually impossible. Surely some may mention the mountain gorilla or the okapi as examples of animals that evaded our knowledge for centuries but, let's be reasonable, Africa isn't North America. Those animals, specially the gorilla, live in some of the most secluded areas in the planet. Also they were only unknown to westerners. The locals knew (and hunted) them for many centuries.
 
if Bigfoot lives in the wild tracts of North America, and there would be a population of at least a few hundreds to justify its survival, why hasn't one been found yet? .

One of the ongoing theories about the fact that a "Bigfoot" hasn't been found is because the creature itself is inter-dimensional in origin. That when its energy is either expended or in a state of flux somehow, it moves back into another dimension.

There have been hundreds of "hunters", and even Indian legends of these creatures just disappearing right in front of their eyes, or off in the distance as they're being chased or stalked.

I have no answer to this, but I do believe that with all the many sightings, physical evidence such as footprints, hair follicles which cannot be tracked back to any living creature we know of (at least the DNA was un-matchable but this could also be because of a deterioration level) and dare I say it, "eyewitness" reporting, continued investigation is warranted.
 
I always wonder about Bruce Macabee. Isn't he the one who was so high on the Ed Walters stuff in Gulf Breeze? Beautiful town (Bump for the Al, Fl, Ms, La Gulf Coast with summer coming on) Anyway, I took one look at that book and that was way back before I even knew what an internet or an alien abduction was and laughed. I mean C'mon Man! Shooting lasers at people and having people jumping out of the way. (if memory serves) Yet, this big time tech guy gave that creedence? I don't know but I'm just not sure of how wonderful Mr. Macabee really is. Of course I don't have any actual experience with him and I am willing to listen.
 
I see an owl close to the camera. The left wing is what is being interpreted as Bigfoot's head. The left-right symmetry is pretty clear. Shadows and the motion blur supply the rest.
 
It doesn't really surprise me that Maccabee was off the mark here. Like many others, my opinion of him was lowered during the Gulf Breeze brouhaha, and I still can't understand why he apparently continues to defend Walters and his pictures.
I looked at the whole big foot site from the link posted here, and I was not impressed. Part of the site was devoted to personal feuds (what? how unusual!) that no one except the parties involved know or care about. Most of the "information" was so poorly-worded that I just gave up; thought someone here might want to have a go at it.
Maybe I am just a blind old bat but I don't see much that's "paranormal" in these pictures. *cleans glasses*
 
Thanks guys for your insight into this. when I first came upon it I did a double take but then concluded it looked very much like an owl in flight from the wing pattern Lance mentions, etc.

One other thing which was only briefly mentioned was the fact that only one pic was taken of the "creature" and this was it. As far as I see it, if this was a mother, child and another looking for apples, why would there only be on pic from a camera which supposedly flashes every minute or so? This, considering the broadcast which the person who placed the cam there specified how no one is in the area, and nothing would have "Spooked" them into jumping off or running away so quickly. Also, one of the things I questioned was whether or not any "footprints" were taken from the area after this sighting. I found it strange that no mention of this in any way was either questioned or spoken about, even though it's supposedly grass which the trees stand on. I would think that there must be a track, or tracks leading up to the grass, or perhaps some form of leavings...hair, etc. But other than this pic the owner of the cam has nothing. Although it is possible that he retrieved the data from the cam long after the event took place, one would think that there would be something physical left by this supposed family of Bigfoot's, even if it was just leavings, etc.

All in all, until further evidence can be shown, perhaps by further cam pics, etc., I feel this was an anomalous picture which in and of itself is nothing more than a simple owl in flight.
 
At first I didnt agree with the "Owl" explanation because I felt the curvature of the wings was too great but after seeing the picture below I now think it is definately an "owl" flying away from the camera owl.jpg
 
This reminds me of another photo awhile back that was being touted as a sasquatch. In this case though I believe the bird is flying towards the camera. But with a little rational logic you can see how the photo in this thread would likely fit the bill as well.

article-1215753-06913703000005DC-68_468x479.jpg

What do you think?? Similar??
 
This reminds me of another photo awhile back that was being touted as a sasquatch. In this case though I believe the bird is flying towards the camera. But with a little rational logic you can see how the photo in this thread would likely fit the bill as well.

176095_199954113350086_100000064978074_792050_2823524_o.jpg

What do you think?? Similar??

this was proven to be a blackbird, but thanks, it does reek of the same type of situation.
 
Back
Top