• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

boston bombing "false" flag claims..

Forums New posts

Free episodes:

I had a look at the first video and I can't see anything that would raise a red flag. The narrator mentions false flag operations but doesn't actually point out anything that is suspicious. He has a go at one guy interviewed because he claims to have seen several runners go down, while the conspiracy-narrator says only one went down. I mean, so what? Perhaps the guy exaggerated a little in the adrenaline-fuelled immediate aftermath. I don't see anything other than a little mistake of a guy interviewed and anyone who has ever conducted interviews for an investigation will tell you that humans consistently get little facts wrong all the time - not deliberately, it's just something that happens in our brains, we all come away from an event with slightly different memories and there is absolutely nothing sinister about it!

I happen to strongly believe there are some serious problems with the official 9/11 story but that doesn't mean I accept every little conspiracy theory going, such as Sandy Hook etc. Some people seem to just wait on the sidelines for any news event they can invent a conspiracy around. I've no doubt two devices exploded in Boston but this guy seems to be saying it was only one. I don't know what he bases all that on, he doesn't expand on any kind of explanation. Possibly one for the 'real conspiracy nut-job' bin methinks?
 
There are already lots of theories, outlandish and otherwise, about this episode. I'm not surprised to see this one, though I think the younger Tsarnaev was probably a mite young to be recruited for such a purpose.

The L.A. Times has a story stating that the two hatched this plot just one week before it happened.
 
The absolute single best thing I have read regarding the Boston Bombing and Tamerlan Tsarnaev:http://www.randirhodes.com/main.html
It’s being reported that the Russians alerted the US “multiple” times about Tamerlan Tsarnaev. That would definitely arouse suspicions—but it’s not clear if the suspicions should be about Tsarnaev... or about the Russians. If the Russians want you to know something, you have to wonder why. And if they really want you to know something, you really have to wonder why.

They still seem to think that the brothers learned how to make the bombs on the internet. I’ll say this—if you learn how to do anything on the internet, chances are it will eventually blow up for you. Do you know how hard it is to accomplish anything complicated with advice from the internet? It’s easier to get something done with advice from one of those Magic 8-Balls. You can’t go wrong with “Reply hazy try again.”

The mother of the Tsarnaev brothers is named Zubeidat Tsarnaev. Every name in this whole saga looks like somebody dropped a bunch of Scrabble tiles. She urged Tamerlan to embrace Islam after she became worried about his drinking, smoking, and womanizing. He might have been better off with the booze and women. Face it, Charlie Sheen has been in a lot of trouble, but nothing like the trouble that Tamerlan Tsarnaev created for himself. And most importantly, the damage that Charlie Sheen caused has been limited to hotel rooms and his own liver.

The mother said of her surviving son “If they are going to kill him. I don’t care. My oldest son is killed, so I don’t care. I don’t care if my youngest son is going to be killed today.” Anybody who ever called their own mother the worst mother in the world owes her an apology. To be fair, the woman is distraught. But you get the feeling that she is constantly distraught. Mom added “I want the world to hear this. And, I don’t care if I am going to get killed too.” Well then, you’re in the right place, living in Dagestan.

The story of the Boston bombers is almost completely crazy. Wait a minute, Alex Jones is involved. It is now officially completely crazy. Alex Jones didn’t need to inject himself into this story. It came with him already in it, like a mouse head in a can of soup. Tamerlan was evidently a listener of Alex Jones. We still don’t know what made him a fanatical Muslim, but we know what made him crazy.
Click to expand...
Read more: http://www.randirhodes.com/main.html#ixzz2RRfe5XBh


In the morning, I'm going to call my mother and apologize for everything I said as a teenager. Seriously. I'd suggest you call your mother as well. However crazy she might be, she can't hold a candle to Zubeidat Tsarnaev. I'm also thinking visiting Dagestan might not be the best thing to have on your Bucket List, unless it's the absolute last thing you have on your Bucket List.

It should be noted that Randi Rhodes is spot on in her editorial. Yes, this story is officially completely crazy. That began when Alex Jones made his little statement about this being a "false flag cover-up" in order for the government to blame the Tea Party. Now it's taken another skinny-dip in the batsh*t when it was reported that Tamerlan Tsarnaev was a fan of Alex Jones, leaving Jones to determine that this, too, is a government conspiracy. Whatever facts may (or may not) emerge in this case will utterly fail to undermine the conspiracy theories. The story was taking a certain tone long before we knew anything other than a bomb went off in Boston. Cases were being made to further certain personal agendas, without considering facts. We should remember that how we frame a story is at least as important as the story itself, as it determines how we discuss and report upon that story.

We should look out how this has developed: Minutes after the bombings first happened and the media was still trying to determine who precisely did what, Alex Jones was already trying to deflect any possibility that one of his ilk might have committed this act. Now that we seem to know this is the case, he's still deflecting his connection to those who committed this horror. He has his own agenda. Right now, that means doing damage control before he specifically knows the details of the all the damage.

We should also look at how the story has been reported: It's now safe to assume that this act of "terrorism" was committed by two radical Muslims who had some serious Mommy-issues, yet we ignore that a mosque in Massachusetts kicked out Tamerlan Tsarnaev after he kept arguing with Muslim clerics. This still doesn't keep us from finding fault with all Muslims, believing that they are silently complicit in such an act. Tamerlan Tsarnaev also complained about not having any American friends, yet he will always be defined as a Muslim terrorist rather than an emotionally disturbed and lonely young man, whether or not he was part of any larger conspiracies or even had a true agenda other than to maim, kill and terrorize. It certainly appears he didn't have strong ties to any American Muslim community, yet even this doesn't really affect the tone of the story.

In comparison, we recently had another mass-killing by a person with some serious Mommy-issues, who also had a religious upbringing and who didn't have any friends. Adam Lanza killed far more people - and went out of his way to specifically target far more children, than anything Tamerlan Tsarnaev might have conceived. However, Adam Lanza wasn't Muslim, so we therefore consider this to be a random act of an emotionally disturbed young man rather than someone with a specific agenda to main, kill and terrorize, even though Lanza appears to have planned this months or even years in advance. Both killers seem to have been inspired by past mass-killings. Both seemed more than willing to die or otherwise martyr themselves - Lanza committed suicide before he could be caught; Tsarnaev was wearing a bomb when he was killed by police.

We're drowning in the insanity, yet we're only being offered more water by those "reporters" who frame the story. When someone tells us exactly what we want to hear, regardless of the facts, we're only being complicit in keeping ourselves ignorant.
 
I should add: Alex Jones is saying this:
Navy SEALs Spotted at Boston Marathon Wearing Suspicious Backpacks?
Click to expand...
Meanwhile, The Onion is saying this:
I Guess When My Older Brother Said 'Let's Bomb The Boston Marathon,' I Should Have Said No
Click to expand...

One of these may well be based in reality. It's just not the one being reported by the "news" source. (When conspiracy theories are more absurd then headlines in The Onion, it's time to rethink where you get your news.)
 
The reality is we knew about the brothers long ago, we had special forces of some sort all over the place at times just feet from the brothers, bomb sniffing dogs, cameras, etc etc.. yet they let them drop the bombs and run. So much for being protected by 3 letter agencies.
 
Ive seen some very odd clips and things that apparently happened that day, but not sure its a conspiracy, if your looking for inconsistencies you will always find them.
Obviously the cynical ones will say it wouldn't be the first time the government has done bad things for the "greater good", as with all conspiracies they will never come out or become common knowledge, the winner makes history and the majority believe what we are told to believe.

But....

Sometimes if it looks like a duck and sounds like a duck........Most of the time its just a duck.
 
Back
Top