NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

Reply to thread

Message

JAL had multiple witnesses, and more than one radar station tracking the object(s), it was a prolonged sighting.

The English Channel sighting with Capt Ray Bowyer, that had multiple witnesses, from different vantage points plus radar.

It may not happen often, but there are these cases in which I think it is very hard to get away from the conclusion that something exceptional happened.

Angelo, I've noticed you equate UFO with paranormal? Is that correct? Forgetting any associated high-strange, in these cases, I don't really wish to 'include' paranormal in the description because it UFO's may indeed sometimes just be super-advanced craft of unknown origin. I suppose it depends on our individual definition of paranormal.

Certainly with the above 2 cases it's hard to include pilot error in the possibilities because in the Channel case, it would mean Pilot+Pilot+passenger+passenger+passenger+passenger....error and to me that quickly becomes more unlikely than say, super-advanced craft from unknown origin.

<blockquote data-quote="Goggs Mackay" data-source="post: 161268" data-attributes="member: 4654">JAL had multiple witnesses, and more than one radar station tracking the object(s), it was a prolonged sighting.&nbsp;The English Channel sighting with Capt Ray Bowyer, that had multiple witnesses, from different vantage points plus radar.&nbsp;It may not happen often, but there are these cases in which I think it is very hard to get away from the conclusion that something exceptional happened.&nbsp;Angelo, I&#039;ve noticed you equate UFO with paranormal? Is that correct? Forgetting any associated high-strange, in these cases, I don&#039;t really wish to &#039;include&#039; paranormal in the description because it UFO&#039;s may indeed sometimes just be super-advanced craft of unknown origin. I suppose it depends on our individual definition of paranormal.&nbsp;Certainly with the above 2 cases it&#039;s hard to include pilot error in the possibilities because in the Channel case, it would mean Pilot+Pilot+passenger+passenger+passenger+passenger....error and to me that quickly becomes more unlikely than say, super-advanced craft from unknown origin.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Goggs Mackay, post: 161268, member: 4654"] JAL had multiple witnesses, and more than one radar station tracking the object(s), it was a prolonged sighting. The English Channel sighting with Capt Ray Bowyer, that had multiple witnesses, from different vantage points plus radar. It may not happen often, but there are these cases in which I think it is very hard to get away from the conclusion that something exceptional happened. Angelo, I've noticed you equate UFO with paranormal? Is that correct? Forgetting any associated high-strange, in these cases, I don't really wish to 'include' paranormal in the description because it UFO's may indeed sometimes just be super-advanced craft of unknown origin. I suppose it depends on our individual definition of paranormal. Certainly with the above 2 cases it's hard to include pilot error in the possibilities because in the Channel case, it would mean Pilot+Pilot+passenger+passenger+passenger+passenger....error and to me that quickly becomes [I]more [/I]unlikely than say, super-advanced craft from unknown origin. [/QUOTE]

Verification