NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

Reply to thread

Message

I hate to say it, but I don't think the phenomenon is amenable to photographic methods of analysis. Consider that many hundreds of thousands of cellphone cameras have failed to record many, if any, unimpeachable pics or videos of UFOs. The history of the UFO is that is has the ability to physically manifest at times and places of its own choosing, while at the same time remaining in virtually complete control of the degree to which, and to whom it presents, evidence of its own reality.

I do applaud such data gathering efforts and it would be great for amateurs to produce hard data impossible for the "establishment" to ignore. Its just that this is not what recorded history of the phenomenon suggests is likely. By all accounts, on those rare occasions when hard data is obtained, it has an uncanny way of vanishing down a societal black hole.

<blockquote data-quote="boomerang" data-source="post: 234607" data-attributes="member: 3872">I hate to say it, but I don&#039;t think the phenomenon is amenable to photographic methods of analysis.&nbsp; Consider that many hundreds of thousands of cellphone cameras have failed to record many, if any,&nbsp; unimpeachable pics or videos of UFOs.&nbsp;&nbsp; The history of the UFO is that is has the ability to physically manifest at times and places of its own choosing,&nbsp; while at the same time remaining in virtually complete control of the degree to which, and to whom it presents, evidence of its own reality. I do applaud such data gathering efforts and it would be great for amateurs to produce hard data impossible for the &quot;establishment&quot; to ignore.&nbsp; Its just that this is not what recorded history of the phenomenon suggests is likely. By all accounts, on those rare occasions when hard data is obtained, it has an uncanny way of vanishing down a societal black hole.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="boomerang, post: 234607, member: 3872"] I hate to say it, but I don't think the phenomenon is amenable to photographic methods of analysis. Consider that many hundreds of thousands of cellphone cameras have failed to record many, if any, unimpeachable pics or videos of UFOs. The history of the UFO is that is has the ability to physically manifest at times and places of its own choosing, while at the same time remaining in virtually complete control of the degree to which, and to whom it presents, evidence of its own reality. I do applaud such data gathering efforts and it would be great for amateurs to produce hard data impossible for the "establishment" to ignore. Its just that this is not what recorded history of the phenomenon suggests is likely. By all accounts, on those rare occasions when hard data is obtained, it has an uncanny way of vanishing down a societal black hole. [/QUOTE]

Verification