Chemtrails finally proven by whistleblower?

[stonehart]

Ok all lets go to work.

1. who is she really?
2. was she really in the military?
3. If she was in the military was she really doing what she says she was doing?

This is her Twitter page: Kristen Meghan (KristenMeghan) on Twitter

Please add more as my BS bump is itching.

 

[Han]

My 5 pence:

(1) I think her name is her real name
(2) Maybe
(3) No

Just my opinion after reading 2 pages from this forum:
Kristen Meghan, former US Air Force whistle-blower? | Metabunk

the clincher for me:

It was a long story involving the AF trying to cover up carcinogenic exposures. Seeing how I was the one who conducted the sampling and found this serious overexposure, I was then demonized and not allowed to share the results with employees, which is illegal. To summarize, I was threatened to be deemed "mentally unfit"

I can't be 100% sure that this was not written by someone pretending to be her, but if it is really her then the amount of grammatical errors in her writings make me extremely suspicious of her claims, as some one who struggles to express my self through writing it takes extra effort and more time for me to respond or reply to messages, but it does result in me being cautious of making errors and as most of the things I write about are not of personal significance, it makes me think that if I were in her shoes and dealing with claims about my credentials I would take even greater care to ensure that what I wrote was legible.
It may seem that I am overplaying the importance of her communication skills or that I am being harsh or unkind, however to my mind: it does not make sense that some one who was payed to gather and report scientific information would be so lacking in "grammatical awareness", especially when trying to add credence to their claims.


On a completely different note whilst pondering this issue it occurred to me that in the olden days (Pre internet) it was possible to glean some information about a person from their "Handwriting" (Graphology) it was deemed useful enough to be employed by Scotland Yard.
I wonder how this has evolved with the internet? and if as much information can be deciphered from a persons "writing style and or skills"?.

 

[Jeff Davis]

My 5 pence:

(1) I think her name is her real name
(2) Maybe
(3) No

Just my opinion after reading 2 pages from this forum:
Kristen Meghan, former US Air Force whistle-blower? | Metabunk

the clincher for me:
It was a long story involving the AF trying to cover up carcinogenic exposures. Seeing how I was the one who conducted the sampling and found this serious overexposure, I was then demonized and not allowed to share the results with employees, which is illegal. To summarize, I was threatened to be deemed "mentally unfit"

I can't be 100% sure that this was not written by someone pretending to be her, but if it is really her then the amount of grammatical errors in her writings make me extremely suspicious of her claims, as some one who struggles to express my self through writing it takes extra effort and more time for me to respond or reply to messages, but it does result in me being cautious of making errors and as most of the things I write about are not of personal significance, it makes me think that if I were in her shoes and dealing with claims about my credentials I would take even greater care to ensure that what I wrote was legible.
It may seem that I am overplaying the importance of her communication skills or that I am being harsh or unkind, however to my mind: it does not make sense that some one who was payed to gather and report scientific information would be so lacking in "grammatical awareness", especially when trying to add credence to their claims.


On a completely different note whilst pondering this issue it occurred to me that in the olden days (Pre internet) it was possible to glean some information about a person from their "Handwriting" (Graphology) it was deemed useful enough to be employed by Scotland Yard.
I wonder how this has evolved with the internet? and if as much information can be deciphered from a persons "writing style and or skills"?.

Han, there are written text lie detector programs that supposedly are fairly accurate in terms of it's analytical capability, but I have no real substantiated clue as to it's real effectiveness.

Lie-Detection Software Could Scan E-Mail, Text Messages - InformationWeek

 

[Charlie Prime]

Ok all lets go to work.

Mick West of Metabunk.org really is your go-to guy on Chemtrails.

He is one of the most fair and polite skeptics I've seen.

He saved me a mountain of work when I was interested in Chemtrails.

 

[Randall]

Ok all lets go to work.

1. who is she really?
2. was she really in the military?
3. If she was in the military was she really doing what she says she was doing?

This is her Twitter page: Kristen Meghan (KristenMeghan) on Twitter

Please add more as my BS bump is itching.

Assuming Kristen's story is true, I think her spirit for trying to tell us about it, and the persecution she has suffered speaks to the core of what's wrong, not only with the chemtrail issue, but with society in general. How many people out there have dedicated themselves to some job or another, believing that what they were doing was more than just a paycheck; something they could have a modicum of personal pride and accomplishment in doing, only to find that it's all a façade to prop up some toxic power structure whose primary goal has nothing to do with how important the work is, or how fortunate they are to have such dedicated employees onboard, or any of the other disingenuous lip service they put in their company policies and newsletters?

The only thing the rest of us can do is feel thankful that at least we're not in the military where they can threaten to lock you up and take your kids away. Although, I suspect that there are plenty of contemptible corporate kingpins who wish they also had that kind of power to abuse. Lastly, do we really need Meghan to tell us what we can all see for ourselves if we just take the time to look up? Why are these kinds of programs are taking place? She says she's not into the why. She just wants it stopped. Here's the link to the site she recommends: GeoengineeringWatch.org

 

[flipper]

http://www.globalresearch.ca/one-fund-boston-and-the-boston-mass-casualty-event/5365179?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=one-fund-boston-and-the-boston-mass-casualty-event

 

[stonehart]

sorry for not posting back in this thread but work has me by the "____" <----- insert word here.
Keep the thread going and thanks for posting in here.

 

[RadarRyder]

Best bet is to talk to folks who work or used to work on these military jet aircraft. I'm skeptical about chemtrails. I'm not a pilot but am an aviation enthusiast. I believe that contrails are affected by pressure, moisture, and other natural factors that may make them hang in the sky for extended periods of time. And I supppose that if the conditions are right they'll turn into clouds as well.

 

[flipper]

The dot-dash effects seen in the sky, Smith explains, are the result of the jet exhaust passing thru sections in the atmosphere that are warmer, creating a broken line or dotted contrail. The following image makes that explanation implausible. Instead, it illustrates that as the plane passed, an on-off switch was thrown several times. It’s hardly likely the ambient temperature and humidity uniformly varied where the plane traveled.

However, the high-bypass turbo fan and better grade fuel do not explain the grid pattern often seen which is clearly not normal air traffic lanes. Below are two images showing the grid pattern. The first, a generic one found on the web , is one of many such images uploaded by concerned citizens who reasonably fail to recognize a normal set of flight lanes.

Planetary Weapons and Military Weather Modification: Chemtrails, Atmospheric Geoengineering and Environmental Warfare | Global Research

 

[Han]

I recall being told several years ago (maybe 7 or 8 possibly more) that this type of contrail was produced by a "top secret" "pulse" jet propulsion system, allegedly used by the "Aurora" spy plane.
It seems that it is now being attributed to "chemtrailing" which is far less "exiting" but probably just about as accurate.

 

[flipper]

I recall being told several years ago (maybe 7 or 8 possibly more) that this type of contrail was produced by a "top secret" "pulse" jet propulsion system, allegedly used by the "Aurora" spy plane.
It seems that it is now being attributed to "chemtrailing" which is far less "exiting" but probably just about as accurate.

Yes, I remember that it was supposed to be from a hyper drive system for a new kind of plane, back then. I have never seen anything like it. What do you think it is? A natural cloud formation? A made up photograph?

 

[Han]

Yes, I remember that it was supposed to be from a hyper drive system for a new kind of plane, back then. I have never seen anything like it. What do you think it is? A natural cloud formation? A made up photograph?

No I think it’s a genuine Photograph (but I am in no way an expert in these matters).

I saw a similar pattern contrail once, but it was at much higher altitude, when I asked around I got the "Aurora" explanation. In fact the one I saw was made up of "rounder" cloudlets which is why I was interested in it.

 

[manxman]

aye you will find a janes article about them if they have put/got old paper issues online now.

 

[Ausssie]

To my knowledge we do not get sprayed here in Australia, is this reported in other places outside of America?

 

[flipper]

To my knowledge we do not get sprayed here in Australia, is this reported in other places outside of America?

I would suggest that you find the thread posted by pixelsmith. The discussion, articles and videos in the thread is the best that I can think of right now. Yes, you can see the spraying in Europe and Australia. I would suggest that you watch the video WHY in the world are they spraying. It seems that the spraying happens more over populated areas. Look up and watch the stuff left behind by the aerial entities turn from usually a white line, to spreading out and eventually to a haze.

 

[flipper]

You may want to skip the introductions, although John Whyte's brief description of his journey is interesting.

Red Ice Radio Podcast:
Sofia Smallstorm - 9/11 Mysteries, Chemtrails, Nanotechnology & The Artificial Environment July 2, 2009 Producer of the documentary film "9/11 Mysteries" and owner of the website www.911weknow.com, Sofia Smallstorm joins us for a very interesting program. She starts out talking about 9/11 and collapse theories. Then, moves on to discuss fluoride & flourine, chemtrails, nanotechnology, GMO, the Svalbard Global Seed Vault and the artificial environment that is being built around us.
Red Ice Radio - Sofia Smallstorm - 9/11 Mysteries, Chemtrails, Nanotechnology & The Artificial Environment

 

[Jeff Davis]

I would suggest that you find the thread posted by pixelsmith. The discussion, articles and videos in the thread is the best that I can think of right now. Yes, you can see the spraying in Europe and Australia. I would suggest that you watch the video WHY in the world are they spraying. It seems that the spraying happens more over populated areas. Look up and watch the stuff left behind by the aerial entities turn from usually a white line, to spreading out and eventually to a haze.

You know, you just reminded me of an anomalous or unusual jet trail that I recently observed out the front window of where I work. I looked up out of the front door of the office where I was standing and there was a jet that looked like it was climbing according to the angle it appeared to moving upward at. What blew my mind? The trail coming out of the jet was very thick and white, you could see it just rolling out the back as the jet climbed, but the odd thing was, the vapor trail disappeared after what would be no more than two lengths of the jet itself. I mean it was just gone. Total blue sky behind where it appeared to just vanish after it got so far away from the jet's rear end. Maybe that's normal based on certain atmospheric conditions. I don't have a clue. Never seen one do that before.

 

[Han]

Dear Flipper, first of all I would like to say thank you because I believe your intentions are good and I always like to see people sharing information, or suggesting sources.

I am going to say please don't take this the wrong way, but obviously it is your choice to interpret what I am saying as you wish, I just want to make it clear that my criticism will be of the information and not you personally.

I have seen "what in the world are they spraying" and I found it was full of errors and dis/mis-information.

I was a participant in Pixels thread regarding Chemtrails and posted my thoughts on the video there.

Honestly the only thing I learned from that thread is that it is conceivable that an "agent" could be mixed into Jet Fuel that could potentially affect the "weather".

I still do not accept that this done routinely, or that it is possible that it is and is being "covered up".

I have not got enough knowledge to understand the minutia of this topic, but their seems to be a consensus among better educated and wiser people than myself that Chemtrails are of little to no concern, and I am yet to be convinced otherwise.

For me the most unattractive thing about the "Chemtrail" proponents is their almost invariable association with things like: 9/11, Fluoridation, NWO etc.

Fear is big business these days, not that it has not always been, and I can not shake the feeling that people are making money from peddling "Chemtrails".

 

[flipper]

You know, you just reminded me of an anomalous or unusual jet trail that I recently observed out the front window of where I work. I looked up out of the front door of the office where I was standing and there was a jet that looked like it was climbing according to the angle it appeared to moving upward at. What blew my mind? The trail coming out of the jet was very thick and white, you could see it just rolling out the back as the jet climbed, but the odd thing was, the vapor trail disappeared after what would be no more than two lengths of the jet itself. I mean it was just gone. Total blue sky behind where it appeared to just vanish after it got so far away from the jet's rear end. Maybe that's normal based on certain atmospheric conditions. I don't have a clue. Never seen one do that before.

Keep watching you will see more things that cannot be explained. This morning there are four, what look like planes, that I counted without looking too hard, making white trail grids across my blue sky in all four directions.

 

[flipper]

Dear Flipper, first of all I would like to say thank you because I believe your intentions are good and I always like to see people sharing information, or suggesting sources.

I am going to say please don't take this the wrong way, but obviously it is your choice to interpret what I am saying as you wish, I just want to make it clear that my criticism will be of the information and not you personally.

I have seen "what in the world are they spraying" and I found it was full of errors and dis/mis-information.

I was a participant in Pixels thread regarding Chemtrails and posted my thoughts on the video there.

Honestly the only thing I learned from that thread is that it is conceivable that an "agent" could be mixed into Jet Fuel that could potentially affect the "weather".

I still do not accept that this done routinely, or that it is possible that it is and is being "covered up".

I have not got enough knowledge to understand the minutia of this topic, but their seems to be a consensus among better educated and wiser people than myself that Chemtrails are of little to no concern, and I am yet to be convinced otherwise.

For me the most unattractive thing about the "Chemtrail" proponents is their almost invariable association with things like: 9/11, Fluoridation, NWO etc.

Fear is big business these days, not that it has not always been, and I can not shake the feeling that people are making money from peddling "Chemtrails".

Han thank you for your most gracious thoughts. You should start a blog on how to reply to those with whom you disagree.