NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

Reply to thread

Message

I have no idea where you are getting your information from Lance. Could you please provide a source for the radiation count? This is the first I have heard of the flawed rad testing.

As far as the growing of the story, between the hand written accounts and the official deatails that were filed, other than the fact they didn't mention in the official file that the object was touched, I do not see any growth. And most security men are taught to carry a notebook for taking notes. So what if he didn't share it for a while, or the other guy didn't remember it. I think that actually adds credence since they don't agree on everything.

And those plaster casts of the impressions do not look like rabbit holes to me (I refer to earlier posts with the photos).
And Ridpath was there weeks afterward, after the trees had been cut down, he says so in his article. How in the world can you get even a moderately accurate assessment of the site after it's been trampled and probably rained on?

Your treatment of these guys really irritates me, like they are all bald faced liars or complete idiots, but as an Army veteran I'm very biased where the guys in uniform are concerned, so I'll keep my mouth shut because I can't be impartial.

I still stand with everything I said in post # 117.

<blockquote data-quote="exo_doc" data-source="post: 95245" data-attributes="member: 815">I have no idea where you are getting your information from Lance. Could you please provide a source for the radiation count? This is the first I have heard of the flawed rad testing.&nbsp;As far as the growing of the story, between the hand written accounts and the official deatails that were filed, other than the fact they didn&#039;t mention in the official file that the object was touched, I do not see any growth. And most security men are taught to carry a notebook for taking notes. So what if he didn&#039;t share it for a while, or the other guy didn&#039;t remember it. I think that actually adds credence since they don&#039;t agree on everything.&nbsp;And those plaster casts of the impressions do not look like rabbit holes to me (I refer to earlier posts with the photos).And Ridpath was there weeks afterward, after the trees had been cut down, he says so in his article. How in the world can you get even a moderately accurate assessment of the site after it&#039;s been trampled and probably rained on?&nbsp;Your treatment of these guys really irritates me, like they are all bald faced liars or complete idiots, but as an Army veteran I&#039;m very biased where the guys in uniform are concerned, so I&#039;ll keep my mouth shut because I can&#039;t be impartial.&nbsp;I still stand with everything I said in post # 117.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="exo_doc, post: 95245, member: 815"] I have no idea where you are getting your information from Lance. Could you please provide a source for the radiation count? This is the first I have heard of the flawed rad testing. As far as the growing of the story, between the hand written accounts and the official deatails that were filed, other than the fact they didn't mention in the official file that the object was touched, I do not see any growth. And most security men are taught to carry a notebook for taking notes. So what if he didn't share it for a while, or the other guy didn't remember it. I think that actually adds credence since they don't agree on everything. And those plaster casts of the impressions do not look like rabbit holes to me (I refer to earlier posts with the photos). And Ridpath was there weeks afterward, after the trees had been cut down, he says so in his article. How in the world can you get even a moderately accurate assessment of the site after it's been trampled and probably rained on? Your treatment of these guys really irritates me, like they are all bald faced liars or complete idiots, but as an Army veteran I'm very biased where the guys in uniform are concerned, so I'll keep my mouth shut because I can't be impartial. I still stand with everything I said in post # 117. [/QUOTE]

Verification