Bits Missing
Paranormal Novice
So many guests fail to check up on David's profile before appearing on the show, but I wonder how many Paracasters have not checked or questioned his background. After all anyone can make up a profile can't they.... (and some of the guests have....)
Well I've been meaning to share this nugget of info for a while but keep forgetting. About 8months ago I was listening to another podcast called TWIP (This Week in Photography - really good if you are interested in digital photography) and they name checked David. The guys who present are relatively well known photographers, digital imaging experts and computer guys but they name checked David in an almost reverent fashion something along the lines of "even David Biedny says...."
When you've got such a high professional profile it really does take balls to start talking about this stuff in public and braving that curtain of laughter.
So thanks David (and Gene) for your dedication to the task in hand. Much like Richard Dawkins (and others) rejuvenated interest in athiesm and became (rightly or wrongly) a springboard/focal point for interest and sense, I like to think of you guys similarily forging a path to understanding, separating signal from noise, becoming that nodal point for sense and credible, intelligent assessment so that people like myself can begin to feel proud that they are interested in (or perhaps compelled to) understand this mystery.
Well I've been meaning to share this nugget of info for a while but keep forgetting. About 8months ago I was listening to another podcast called TWIP (This Week in Photography - really good if you are interested in digital photography) and they name checked David. The guys who present are relatively well known photographers, digital imaging experts and computer guys but they name checked David in an almost reverent fashion something along the lines of "even David Biedny says...."
When you've got such a high professional profile it really does take balls to start talking about this stuff in public and braving that curtain of laughter.
So thanks David (and Gene) for your dedication to the task in hand. Much like Richard Dawkins (and others) rejuvenated interest in athiesm and became (rightly or wrongly) a springboard/focal point for interest and sense, I like to think of you guys similarily forging a path to understanding, separating signal from noise, becoming that nodal point for sense and credible, intelligent assessment so that people like myself can begin to feel proud that they are interested in (or perhaps compelled to) understand this mystery.