Gareth
Nothin' to see here
Ive read a couple of Goods books now and he seems like a pretty credible guy. He also gets lots of respect in the community. Im curious, what did you guys think after interviewing him? he made some pretty incredible claims about alien bases and encounters with non-humans on earth that pretty much went unchallenged on the show. What did you think at the time?
Out of all the 'respected' researchers in the community Good seems to be the only one telling these pretty incredible stories and taking them seriously. Im not saying that hes not being truthful or even that his stories arent true, but I find it odd that he generally goes unchallenged on some of his more 'out-there' stuff.
Im reading Unearthly Disclosure right now, and it has been a pretty interesting book. Well, up until page 140 through 224. He devoted this considerably large chunk of a 300-page book to the Filiberto Caponi story. I am of the opinion that this particular story is complete and utter horse shit, and to me reads like a pathetic d-grade interpretation of many classic UFO-related elements rolled into one. Not to mention the ridiculous pictures that for some reason many find legit:
And guess what Caponi's profession is: Artist/sculptor! I just dont get how this guy has been taken seriously at all. When it was pointed out by a researcher that he could have created this stupid looking thing Caponi said "It would not have been hard for me to have created such a model but I certainly would have made it rather more attractive". Well, case closed then.
Good made this case the focus of his book with pictures and everything. My problem is, if Good will take this case so seriously, suddenly everything else he says drops down a few credibility points.
Gene & Dave, what did you think when Good said that he communicated telepathically with a non-human in a hotel lobby?
Out of all the 'respected' researchers in the community Good seems to be the only one telling these pretty incredible stories and taking them seriously. Im not saying that hes not being truthful or even that his stories arent true, but I find it odd that he generally goes unchallenged on some of his more 'out-there' stuff.
Im reading Unearthly Disclosure right now, and it has been a pretty interesting book. Well, up until page 140 through 224. He devoted this considerably large chunk of a 300-page book to the Filiberto Caponi story. I am of the opinion that this particular story is complete and utter horse shit, and to me reads like a pathetic d-grade interpretation of many classic UFO-related elements rolled into one. Not to mention the ridiculous pictures that for some reason many find legit:
And guess what Caponi's profession is: Artist/sculptor! I just dont get how this guy has been taken seriously at all. When it was pointed out by a researcher that he could have created this stupid looking thing Caponi said "It would not have been hard for me to have created such a model but I certainly would have made it rather more attractive". Well, case closed then.
Good made this case the focus of his book with pictures and everything. My problem is, if Good will take this case so seriously, suddenly everything else he says drops down a few credibility points.
Gene & Dave, what did you think when Good said that he communicated telepathically with a non-human in a hotel lobby?