NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

Reply to thread

Message

To verify this I'd have to know which recordings the data for the analysis was obtained from because recorders at two different locations would also provide two different distances. Also the idea that echoes could explain the difference is feasible, but it would require a more detailed look at the audio files. One of the reasons that an echo or data from different recorders seems to fit is because the pattern and timing is so close to being the same that for two shooters to produce the sound, they would have to fire at precisely the same time the exact same number of rounds in exactly the same timing between rounds, and that seems a bit unlikely.

However that alone doesn't invalidate the analysis. It might be accurate, and some of the follow-up suggestions to further confirm the theory are good.

<blockquote data-quote="Randall" data-source="post: 264027" data-attributes="member: 2682">To verify this I&#039;d have to know which recordings the data for the analysis was obtained from because recorders at two different locations would also provide two different distances. Also the idea that echoes could explain the difference is feasible, but it would require a more detailed look at the audio files. One of the reasons that an echo or data from different recorders seems to fit is because the pattern and timing is so close to being the same that for two shooters to produce the sound, they would have to fire at precisely the same time the exact same number of rounds in exactly the same timing between rounds, and that seems a bit unlikely.However that alone doesn&#039;t invalidate the analysis. It might be accurate, and some of the follow-up suggestions to further confirm the theory are good.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Randall, post: 264027, member: 2682"] [FONT=Arial][SIZE=4]To verify this I'd have to know which recordings the data for the analysis was obtained from because recorders at two different locations would also provide two different distances. Also the idea that echoes could explain the difference is feasible, but it would require a more detailed look at the audio files. One of the reasons that an echo or data from different recorders seems to fit is because the pattern and timing is so close to being the same that for two shooters to produce the sound, they would have to fire at precisely the same time the exact same number of rounds in exactly the same timing between rounds, and that seems a bit unlikely.[/SIZE] However that alone doesn't invalidate the analysis. It might be accurate, and some of the follow-up suggestions to further confirm the theory are good.[/FONT] [/QUOTE]

Verification