Let me see if I've got this straight (I realize I may not have). You are telling us that knowledgeable scholars who translated ancient Egyptian hieroglyphics with the aid of a handy Rosetta Stone that happened to list all the translations might have got it all wrong.
NO.
Ronald Pegg’s work and my own studies do not mention the Rosetta Stone.
The Papyrus of Ani was not necessarily “translated…with the aid of a handy Rosetta Stone”, thus your general assumption and comment is not necessarily relevant to Pegg’s work..
Plus the Rosetta Stone does NOT “happen.. to list all the translations” - only enough to align the languages from the three given texts thereon.
And to cite your quote regarding Champollion deciphering hieroglyphs – “he could make educated guesses about what the other hieroglyphs stood for”.
So the meanings of some glyphs ARE guesses. Books about Egyptian Translations also say for many glyphs that their meaning are ‘guesses’.
Ronald Pegg found that in some cases where some had been “guessed”, they actually referred to something else other than phonetic sounds.
He eventually matched and found the cd-rom to be that “something else”.
An alternative explanation is that these symbols stand for various pieces and operations surrounding using a modern CD-ROM. This includes not only ancient Egyptian, but the '10 commandments' tablets of Moses, the Book of Mormon as shown by Moroni (that took magic glasses to read) and that his very same CD-ROM is depicted in various ancient texts from many diffeent ancient civilizations……
Is that a fair summary of the issue?
YES. Absolutely correct.
Full details (in a summary format as a purchasable E-Book) can be found
HERE
This CD-ROM is about ancient civilizations itself and many pictures on the CD-ROM are also in these many diverse ancient texts.
NO. What you are inferring is too much of a generalization.
This is how I previously answered a similar question:
>
One set of matching details could just be a coincidence, and could be the result of the makers
of the cd-rom using one particular set of ancient descriptions as their source and inspiration.
Maybe also two or three (or four) could be passed off as 'just coincidences'.
But ten ancient sets of details from different time periods and countries matching is beyond a coincidence.
The same set of descriptions turn up in many ancient stories where most are associated with a messenger turning up in a bright light (or 'dream') carrying a stone of testimony (aka. wheel, tablet, plate, or disc) which tells of future things and provides 'visions'. These extra associated characteristics indicate that the same source was viewed by all the ancient writers and story tellers by the same means - and not that any one ancient story was the source used by the makers of the cd-rom for their imagery.
>
…and…
>
Regarding people's own conclusions, we are often asked, concerning the observed evidence from these experiments as being identical or very close to the Ancients cd-rom pictures...
Is the imagery, on the cd-rom, evidence of someone or a group of people travelling back in time and showing the ancient people the images from it, or was the Ancients cd-rom created by people that have read any or all of the texts? They may have only been inspired, even subconsciously, to make the cd-rom the same or very similar to what is in the ancient texts.
If the descriptions in the Atlantis dialogues by Plato only matched to the cd-rom imagery, then, yes, you would have to conclude that the makers of the cd-rom used the Atlantis descriptions as inspiration.
If the descriptions in the Bablylonian stories only matched to the cd-rom imagery, then, yes, you would have to conclude that the makers of the cd-rom used Bablylonian descriptions as inspiration.
If...Akkadian…Aboriginal Dreamtime Stories...North American Indian Mythologies...Buddhism & Hindu Understanding...Old Testament...New Testament...Qur'an...Book of Mormon...each only matched, then, yes……
But all of the above cultures that DO match to the imagery from the Ancients cd-rom are NOT part of the history contained on that cd-rom. So why would the makers use imagery from over ten other cultures that they are not presenting on the cd-rom ?
The civilizations presented are from around the Mediterranean region from betwen 2000 BCE and 476 CE, being Etruria, Carthage, Roman Empire, Greece, Phoenicia and Egypt.
(The Egyptian section only presents seven video shows, and not pages of pictures.)
The Etrurian section shows things Eturian…
The Roman section shows things Roman…
The Greece section shows things Greek…
The Phoenician section shows things Phoenician…
The Carthage section shows things Carthagian…
…and NOT anything to do with Altantis, Babylon, Akkadia, Aboriginal Dreamtime Stories...North American Indian Mythologies...Buddhism & Hindu Understanding...Old Testament...New Testament...Qur'an, nor Book of Mormon.
>
And your counter-argument to people mentioning the unlikelihood of this is simply, 'What of the scholars got it wrong?'
NO.
In many cases, such as in the translation and interpretation of so-called ‘religious texts’, the scholars have not only “got it wrong”, they have deliberately used their preconceived religious ideas in the translation rather than the original given Hebrew or Greek meanings.
These are the “same scholars” whom you rely upon to have translated Egyptian Glyphs correctly.
Ronald Pegg presented his expose on these mis-translations in his
Booklet # 14 entitled BIBLE MYSTERIES CONFRONTED (specifically pp 28-29).
The link to Egyptian Hieroglyphs is that, as Moses was an Egyptian priest, his account of his encounter with the cd-rom (as documented by Ani) is documented in the Old Testament.
It is not just the case whether ‘scholars got it wrong’, in many cases where the scholar has translated an ancient text or glyph, he states himself “origin unknown’ or similar, then uses his best guess.
In these cases it is obvious to that scholar that he IS making a guess - and his best guess is based upon his own personal experiences, being ones formulated in the Religious world of the past three or four centuries.
In that era, the story of a “messenger” appearing in a bright light and showing things of the future on a magic glass mirror and giving warnings about religious wars, was taken to be “of God and his angels”.
Thus a circle with a hole/dot in the middle next to a sitting man in white was obviously the Sun God.
But the Sun, even in ancient times, did not have a hole in the middle !
When a different educated ‘guess’ was made by Ronald Pegg, such as it is a cd-rom being held by a man in white sitting at a computer, the question had to be asked PROVE IT THEN Ronald !
When the Papyrus of Ani is re-translated using the idea of a cd-rom and computer operator instead of a sun god, the story tells of a series of images plus upon what they were viewed and how they were invoked to come forward.
Then, when other Egyptian stories and glyphs were studied, it was found that the descriptions ARE of the contents of modern cd-roms.
So, the proof for “scholars” best guesses that there was a Sun God - is nil.
The proof that modern cd-roms are being described - is that their contents are (often) exactly describing picture elements by element, in ‘all the texts previously mentioned by you and I’.
Seven years of research by Pegg produced his 20 Booklets (link given earlier).
Five years of research by myself has produced
published Reports.
Websites include
World Breaking Discoveries and
PPHC Study Group
Specific evaluations of the works of Ronald Pegg and Eddy Pengelly have their own websites,
respectively:
www.pphcstudygroup.org.au/evaluatepegg and
www.pphcstudygroup.org.au/evaluatepengelly
And then there are the
2008 Reports regarding
Ezekiel, Daniel, Middle Eastern Gods, Egyptian Gods, Genesis, Revelations, and CD-Rom Depictions.
.
So my counter-argument to people mentioning the unlikelihood of “all this” is NOT simply, 'What if the scholars got it wrong?'
BUT pointing out that they do in fact have it somewhat incorrect some of the time, and in those cases, the stories are describing modern images and history from mid 1995 cd-roms, due to Time Travel encounters with ‘time messengers’ who were often perceived as Angels, gods, or God.
