I sort of think the only shoddy reporting going on was his. given the crowded unsanitary (by Western standards) conditions in those countries I would THINK that any outbreaks would be much much worse than it is currently and would be at a flu like pandemic if it indeed had gone airborne. If this guy thought he was on to something he could have picked a better news source than the bbc who would probably work in conjunction with world governments if there was some kind of attempt to sweep things under the rug.
I tend to think that this outbreak evolved to a large extent because of a tainted mass-produced food source and there would be further spread because of their funeral customs. And it's a new strain. The first case was suspected back in December of last year and it's taken 6 months to get to this level. That doesn't sound like an airborne driven outbreak to me.
Read the bottom of that bbc report that is mentioned...that is for some reason not highlighted
BBC News - Growing concerns over 'in the air' transmission of Ebola
"...The reality is that they are contained and they remain local, if it was really an airborne virus like influenza is it would spread all over the place, and that's not happening."
Hidden host
The authors believe that more work needs to be done to clarify the role of wild and domestic pigs in spreading the virus. There have been anecdotal accounts of pigs dying at the start of human outbreaks. Dr Kobinger believes that if pigs do play a part, it could help contain the virus.
"If they do play a role in human outbreaks it would be a very easy point to intervene" he said. "It would be easier to vaccinate pigs against Ebola than humans."
The fact that it COULD go airborne is not covered up it has been brought up on many an occastion