• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

Fighter jets chase UFO down M5 in UK

Forums New posts

Free episodes:

I just can't see how the cameraman could pan from the stationary UFO to the jets so quickly and so accurately. Then follow the jets at supersonic speeds and then pan back to the stationary UFO so quickly and so accurately.

This feat of photography is simply not credible. The wagons are CGI also (too clean) in my view.

Also, where is the context, the cameraman, other witnesses, the end of the film?

Fake.
 
Xylo said:
One thing bugs me...why would the cameraman take the camera off of the ufo to film the jets ?
Click to expand...

They could have have thought there were more UFOs coming into view? That's the impression I got.

However, I don't have much techincal skills in analysing footage so I'll leave that up to those more qualified. Good point about the very clean vehicles though I watched it again and they do seem a bit shiny!

Thanks for the link. As the infamous Nick Pope always says 'interesting...if true';)
 
ascended_master said:
I just can't see how the cameraman could pan from the stationary UFO to the jets so quickly and so accurately. Then follow the jets at supersonic speeds and then pan back to the stationary UFO so quickly and so accurately.

This feat of photography is simply not credible. The wagons are CGI also (too clean) in my view.

Also, where is the context, the cameraman, other witnesses, the end of the film?

Fake.
Click to expand...

Those are my impressions also. The quick pan, the dramatic setup, if it isn't a fake I'd really be surprised.
 
The trucks are available in other shots on the web with the same license numbers. This relevation can prove this video is another hoax.
 
The cars sound like a sample loop to me. The reason I say this is that all but one of the car sounds that pass by are the same pitch and modulation.

I have spent many a long hour building such loops and know the trick.

Sorry trust a sound guy to noitice that
 
My first impression when I watched the video was that it was CGI. The textures, camera movement, and absence of human beings in the shots all add up to give the impression of CGI.

You have to wonder who generated this and why. With so many obviously faked (and some not so obvious fakes) UFO videos on youtube you have to wonder what is reason for their creation. Are they generated as homework in some sort of CGI or video production class? Are UFOs picked because it is sensational and easier to create than other sensational subjects such as bigfoot and ghosts? Why create fake UFO videos and photographs?

I ask this question yet I have a framed perfectly centered photo of a flying saucer with a red light on top that I created myself. It is perfectly centered because I threw the hubcap up in the air a dozen times and took photos of it until I finally caught a good shot. Someone at the photo development lab stuck a red light on the dome of the thing, unsolicited by me but greatly appreciated. However, I have never had a soul look at the thing who didn't say "It's a hubcap!" to which I reply "Clever bastards aren't they?" and we have a good laugh. I created this photo on a lark when I discovered an old hubcap in the field where we were flying kites. I show it as a joke. Maybe that is what all the other business is and not the product of nefarious plots by shadowy characters trying to sow disinformation and confusion. Of course faking UFO photos, even as a joke, is a very bad idea should you ever actually take a picture of a real one because your credibility is instantly shot since you have "faked UFO photos in the past".

Where are the CGI ghost and bigfoot videos?
 
Sorry to dissapoint you all but I think that has got to be false. I'm no video expert, though it does look as if one jet is a cut and paste of the other, but the attitude of the aircarft is all wrong.

The UK has two types of aircraft on intercept duties - the Typhoon and Tornado. The Tornado is being phased out but I think still covers the Northern part of the UK (watching the North Sea for the Russians), and Southern UK is covered by the new Typhoon. Given this is the Midlands it would likley be Typhoons from RAF Coningsby. These are definitely not Tornados as, despite the grainy videos, the profile of "swingwing" and large tail plane are not present. It could be Typhoons as the profile looks a bit F16ish, as does this, but the quality makes it difficult to tell.

However, the decider is that two fighters would not approach an intercept in such a close formation. They would be working as a team but one would get in close and the other would be about 10+ miles away in an elevated position, just in case....and common sense if you think about it

This one is not in the ops manuals I'm afraid.

(..Bits Missing is off to watch Top Gun again....)
 
What! Nick Pope fanned the flames? No! Say it ain't so! I find it difficult to believe that any legitimate news organization's video technicians couldn't detect the fraudulent nature of the video after a couple of viewings.
 
Back
Top