• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

Flying Kitchenettes or Frying Saucer ?

Free episodes:

justcurious

Flying Kitchenettes
Is solid food solid proof ?

I thought I'd post the Joe Simonton case in its own thread because it's one of the most intriguing close encounter, investigated during project Blue Book (unexplained), with physical evidences (sic) and a comic twist. Definitely in my favourite top 10.


Here's a few images pertaining to the case, a video interview of Mr Simonton and Jacques Vallée commentary of the case :

spacecookies2.jpg

It was an unusual day for the Food and Drug Laboratory of the U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, when the Air Force requested analysis of a piece of wheat cake that had been cooked ... aboard a flying saucer! The human being who had obtained the cake was Joe Simonton, a sixty-year old chicken farmer who lived alone in
a small house in the vicinity of Eagle River, Wisconsin. He was given three cakes, ate one of them, and thought it "tasted like cardboard." The Air Force put it more scientifically:

The cake was composed of hydrogenated fat, starch, buckwheat hulls, soya bean hulls, wheat bran. Bacteria and radiation readings were normal for this material. Chemical, infra-red and other destructive type tests were run on the material. The Food and Drug Laboratory of the U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare concluded that the material was an ordinary pancake of terrestrial origin.

Where did it come from? The reader will have to decide for himself what he chooses to believe after reading this ... incident, ... a first-hand account, given by a man of absolute integrity. Speaking for the U.S. Air Force, Dr. J. Allen Hynek, who investigated the case along with Major Robert Friend and an officer from Sawyer Air Force Base, stated: "There is no question that Mr. Simonton felt that his contact had been a real experience."

The time was approximately 11:00 A.M. on April 18, 1961, when Joe Simonton was attracted outside by a peculiar noise similar to "knobby tires on a wet pavement." Stepping into his yard, he faced a silvery saucer-shaped object "brighter than chrome," which appeared to be hovering close to the ground without actually touching it. The object
was about twelve feet high and thirty feet in diameter. A hatch opened about five feet from the ground, and Simonton saw three men inside the machine. One of them was dressed in a black two-piece suit. The occupants were about five feet in height. Smooth shaven, they appeared to "resemble Italians." They had dark hair and skin and wore outfits with turtle-neck tops and knit helmets.

One of the men held up a jug apparently made of the same material as the saucer. His motions to Joe Simonton seemed to indicate that he needed water. Simonton took the jug, went inside the house, and filled it. As he returned, he saw that one of the men inside the saucer was "frying food on a flameless grill of some sort." The interior of the ship was black, "the colour of wrought iron." Simonton, who could see several instrument panels, heard a slow whining sound, similar to the hum of a generator. When he made a motion indicating he was interested in the food that was being prepared, one of the men, who was also dressed in black but with a narrow red trim along the trousers, handed him three cookies, about three inches in diameter and perforated with small holes.

The whole affair had lasted about five minutes. Finally, the man closest to the witness attached a kind of belt to a hook in his clothing and closed the hatch in such a way that Simonton could scarcely detect its outline. Then the object rose about twenty feet from the ground before taking off straight south, causing a blast of air that bowed some nearby pine trees.

Along the edge of the saucer, the witness recalls, were exhaust pipes six or seven inches in diameter. The hatch was about six feet high and thirty inches wide, and although the object has always been described as a saucer, its shape was that of two inverted bowls.

When two deputies sent by Sheriff Schroeder, who had known Simonton for fourteen years, arrived on the scene, they could not find any corroborative evidence. The sheriff affirmed that the witness obviously believed the truth of that he was saying and talked very sensibly about the incident.

The Eagle River case has never been solved. The Air Force believes that Joe Simonton, who lived alone, had a sudden dream while he was awake and inserted his dream into the continuum of events around him of which he was conscious. I understand several psychologists in Dayton, Ohio, are quite satisfied with this explanation, and so are most serious amateur ufologists.


... Two weeks after the sighting, Joe Simonton told a United Press International reporter that "if it happened again, I don't think I"d tell anybody about it." And indeed, if flying saucers are devices used by a super-scientific civilization from space, we would expect them to be packed inside with electronic gadgetry, super-radars, and a big computerized spying apparatus. But visitors in human shape, who breathe our air and zip around in flying kitchenettes, that is too much, Mr. Simonton!

Jacques Vallée, Passport to Magonia 1969, Dimensions 1997.

JoeSimonton1.jpg

Something HAPPENED to this man... 8)
 
It's hard to say if these types of cases aren't red herrings. If a man in a bar related such an incident, I'd be drunk to believe him.

There was a similar report in one of last years UK MOD releases. An old man was enjoying some night fishing when a saucer-type UFO landed next to him. It had a blue flashing light on top. The occupant came out and asked him for a drink of his coffee (going off memory here). The man gave him a cup and the 'guy' drank it, entered the craft and promptly took off.

An earlier release (March 09 ish) related a woman walking through a London park one night. She was approached by a man with a Scandinavian accent. He told here he was an alien and was visiting Earth. He then told her that he wasn't allowed to talk about it and left. Some moments later an unidentified light rose into the skies from behind the woods he'd walked into.

It's maybe better to just push these very weird and implausible reports to one side and focus on the ones that appeal to our sense of mystery technology or beings that appear more alien. On the other hand, they're frequently coming from people with no known habit of telling tall tales or even caring about UFOs. If I think about these kinds of incidents too much it gives me a headache!
 
Quote from the video at 1:10, this will go down in history as one of the greatest quote of ufology.

And there I stood, right here in my driveway, with a handful of hot [crispy?] pancakes...

Joe Simonton.
I've heard many times that First-Contact would be like nothing we ever imagined... there you go !
 
Well that explains crop circles then! Its just aliens stealing our crops to make pancakes. maybe if they offered him some beef burgers we could explain cattle mutilations too?

On a more serious note this could explain our super advanced no-fire cookers and non-stick frying pan technology see pics below
002_Mothership01a.jpg005_NUFOCon01a.jpg
IMG_4031_03.JPGBuitlt-in-Electric-Hob-601-D4-.jpg
also check out this UFO (unidentified frying object)

cooker.jpg003_UFORock02a.jpg
 
Well, as someone says here, it fits the pattern.

"Simonton...could see several instrument panels"

Yet another UFO that looks like what someone at the time of the sighting would think advanced technology should look like. Not what our technology actually looks like (40 years later) or what it will look like in thousands or millions of years.

Red herring yes, but whose?
 
Back
Top