bluecat
Skilled Investigator
What a tremendous show!
I've worked in TV and AV production for . . . well . . . a lot of years. I go back to the Pentax Spotmatic, Oxbury, Forox, Genigraphics, Autographics, Xenographics' Mirage and Inscriber. It was a lot of fun hearing about Jim doing things that I, well, never thought of.
I was waiting for someone to mention circles of confusion.
You've referred to my post, the one where I said that I think the ufo field has made little progress over the last 40 years. I know you take exception, but I stand firm.
Think about the fundamental questions: What are they? Where do they come from? Why are they here? How do they work? Why do they behave the way they do? What does our government know? I don't think we've made much progress with any of these questions.
There are more observations, new ways to analyze data more theories, more half-baked nit wits, but, as far as I can see, no answers to the fundamental questions.
(As I've mentioned in an earlier post, I wonder if we've asking the wrong questions.)
How about a show with a panel of experts talking about the 5 or 10 new things we've learned about UFOs since the death of J. Allen Hynek. Call it "The things Hynek didn't know."
One last thing -- you are not too hard on guests. People ought to believe things for good reasons and they should not feel insulted or abused if you ask them to justify their statements. They should welcome the opportunity, unless, of course, their reasons aren't so good.
bluecat
I've worked in TV and AV production for . . . well . . . a lot of years. I go back to the Pentax Spotmatic, Oxbury, Forox, Genigraphics, Autographics, Xenographics' Mirage and Inscriber. It was a lot of fun hearing about Jim doing things that I, well, never thought of.
I was waiting for someone to mention circles of confusion.
You've referred to my post, the one where I said that I think the ufo field has made little progress over the last 40 years. I know you take exception, but I stand firm.
Think about the fundamental questions: What are they? Where do they come from? Why are they here? How do they work? Why do they behave the way they do? What does our government know? I don't think we've made much progress with any of these questions.
There are more observations, new ways to analyze data more theories, more half-baked nit wits, but, as far as I can see, no answers to the fundamental questions.
(As I've mentioned in an earlier post, I wonder if we've asking the wrong questions.)
How about a show with a panel of experts talking about the 5 or 10 new things we've learned about UFOs since the death of J. Allen Hynek. Call it "The things Hynek didn't know."
One last thing -- you are not too hard on guests. People ought to believe things for good reasons and they should not feel insulted or abused if you ask them to justify their statements. They should welcome the opportunity, unless, of course, their reasons aren't so good.
bluecat