NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

Reply to thread

Message

Sometimes you get to hear rare guests on podcasts who do have dates, facts, figures, sources and places all flowing freely from their steel trap minds. Unfortunately, those folks are pretty infrequent and are generally the historians or ethnographers in the field - they are my favourite shows. Some guests make it a point to have their points researched and noted prior to the show; other times it's the host who has all the knowledge - Ecker provides a lot of that in his narrations. I think trying to crank out a show as often as DMR does is a pretty impressive feat on its own. But most paranormal podcasts in general are neither science oriented nor verifiable. That's why a lot of people get to state opinions, hearsay or pure invention to varying degrees on all the podcasts. It's the nature of the beast. Discrimination is always dictated by the various constraints of production.

<blockquote data-quote="Burnt State" data-source="post: 159103" data-attributes="member: 5332"><p>Sometimes you get to hear rare guests on podcasts who do have dates, facts, figures, sources and places all flowing freely from their steel trap minds. Unfortunately, those folks are pretty infrequent and are generally the historians or ethnographers in the field - they are my favourite shows. Some guests make it a point to have their points researched and noted prior to the show; other times it&#039;s the host who has all the knowledge - Ecker provides a lot of that in his narrations. I think trying to crank out a show as often as DMR does is a pretty impressive feat on its own. But most paranormal podcasts in general are neither science oriented nor verifiable. That&#039;s why a lot of people get to state opinions, hearsay or pure invention to varying degrees on all the podcasts. It&#039;s the nature of the beast. Discrimination is always dictated by the various constraints of production.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="Burnt State, post: 159103, member: 5332"] Sometimes you get to hear rare guests on podcasts who do have dates, facts, figures, sources and places all flowing freely from their steel trap minds. Unfortunately, those folks are pretty infrequent and are generally the historians or ethnographers in the field - they are my favourite shows. Some guests make it a point to have their points researched and noted prior to the show; other times it's the host who has all the knowledge - Ecker provides a lot of that in his narrations. I think trying to crank out a show as often as DMR does is a pretty impressive feat on its own. But most paranormal podcasts in general are neither science oriented nor verifiable. That's why a lot of people get to state opinions, hearsay or pure invention to varying degrees on all the podcasts. It's the nature of the beast. Discrimination is always dictated by the various constraints of production. [/QUOTE]

Verification