G
Gil Bavel
Guest
Some of the more obscure mutilations reported by Linda Multoun Howe are "half-cats" and dogs, cut right in half and the standard mutie bit as relates to the rest of the cases; no blood at all, no fang or tooth marks, no footprints.
I took a look at the front page of my paper the day before yesterday, and found that not only were there such cases going on here in my home town of Lawrence, KS, but that they have been ongoing for weeks, or maybe even months.
This seems to be significant because the mutilations of animals like dogs, cats, deer, going all the way up to cattle, obviously, belie a darker side of the standard cattle mutilation stories. There have been reports of human mutilations, and many abductees have brought back disturbing reports of what the UFO occupants are doing with the soft tissue and organs they bring back. As the UFO mystery becomes better understood, it may be that the UFO occupants are getting progressively less concerned about being seen--and what or who they take. It's been suggested that the thousands of missing persons reports that never get solved every year could be the result of "human mutilations".
Up until recently, the articles in the paper and on the news have said that the cuts were clean and no animal could have done it. Now, they're saying they were probably done by "An animal". I find this odd, but no more so than the kind of thing that normally happens in the media. They don't want to scare the locals.
Here's a local TV news story about it:
LJWorld.com / Another mutilated cat found in west Lawrence
And a clipping from the article:
I took a look at the front page of my paper the day before yesterday, and found that not only were there such cases going on here in my home town of Lawrence, KS, but that they have been ongoing for weeks, or maybe even months.
This seems to be significant because the mutilations of animals like dogs, cats, deer, going all the way up to cattle, obviously, belie a darker side of the standard cattle mutilation stories. There have been reports of human mutilations, and many abductees have brought back disturbing reports of what the UFO occupants are doing with the soft tissue and organs they bring back. As the UFO mystery becomes better understood, it may be that the UFO occupants are getting progressively less concerned about being seen--and what or who they take. It's been suggested that the thousands of missing persons reports that never get solved every year could be the result of "human mutilations".
Up until recently, the articles in the paper and on the news have said that the cuts were clean and no animal could have done it. Now, they're saying they were probably done by "An animal". I find this odd, but no more so than the kind of thing that normally happens in the media. They don't want to scare the locals.
Here's a local TV news story about it:
LJWorld.com / Another mutilated cat found in west Lawrence
And a clipping from the article: