universeseeker
Skilled Investigator
Has NASA found an ancient wall on Mars ?
-
NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!
Has NASA found an ancient wall on Mars ?
- Thread starter universeseeker
- Start date
Free episodes:
ALPHA ROMEO UNIFORM
Whittingham
Natural formation done by 4ft aliens which are native to Mars (nothing here folks move on) and if there is a V or M
in yellow on the wall looking structure please ignore place by ancient bacteria of the A.I type floating within a salt solution.
in yellow on the wall looking structure please ignore place by ancient bacteria of the A.I type floating within a salt solution.
This whole "finding" of objects, faces and manufactured features inside photos from Mars is really getting ridiculous. Don't these people have real lives in the real world? Richard Hoaxland's claim of finding a Martian VW several years ago should have been a wake up call to all of us—especially all these amateur Martian photo analysts, but NOOO instead, it has unleashed an army of true-believin, magnifying glass wielding OCD patients. Many, I'd bet, living in their Mom's basement, getting woodys whenever they find the latest face of Jesus or crab-in-a-cave on Mars. I do admire that they are pouring over thousands and thousands and thousands of fuzzy images of the Martian laandscape and I do hope that maybe some day one of them will get lucky and truly something significant.
universeseeker
Skilled Investigator
well , I kinda have that same feeling with people who see a white light or spacedebris and think that it is a ufo , a rather believe in a lost civilization that could have existed on a planet that was once habitable. Can't imagine myself thinking that a white light is an alien in a sphere , guess i'm also not the only OCD patient here then. But anyway , I respect your answer and your way of thinking. And by the way , my mother past away some years ago ... so i guess I won't be living there anymore either. Maybe you should think twice before writing down such things.
As i checked your name, I can see you are someone that deepens itself in some ,for me anyway, strange things. But I do think you are a respectful person.
So, I wonder why you are so angry on people who believe that there must have been a civilization in the past on the red planet, because according to al the NASA data they gathered, there seems to be a big chance that there has been life on the planet. If that was any form of intelligent life.. we Don't know. but still , the possibility is there.
And like i mentioned, I may not believe in flying white lights with aliens, still I think that there can be found evidence on Mars if there has been a civilization indeed.
And if you are that smart, then how comes you think that , and I quote "getting woodys whenever they find the latest face of Jesus" , people who think that there was another civilization on another planet would believe in Jesus ? Don't you think that those people really NOT believe in jesus or any other religion? But I don't blame you, maybe you just didn't think about that yet.
And maybe you gona erase me now. But hey , I think that I also have the right to say what i think, and I do it in a less insulting way don't you think ?
Last edited:
stonehart
Paranormal Adept
The sad thing is by then even if they do find "something of significance" it will I expect be ignored as just more tinfoil hat BS as the water has been so muddied up by all the crazy shit.
For me there isn't much evidence from Mars that is striking alone, but taken as a whole, it often seems like there could be remnants of something from the past. Whatever happened to those areas that looked like they had huge areas of vegetation? I don't think I've heard them explained away yet, nor have I heard of more recent, possibly better resolution images from the same areas. Of course if I were to spend a couple of hours I might find out!
I know to many the whole 'Face' on Mars thing was debunked when better photos were taken but at the very least, I've often thought that even with the newer photos, the bilateral symmetry of the outline of the face was alone very artificial, who knows if it ever was an ancient monument that has eroded too much, but the outline still keeps its symmetry.
I think we can all agree that unless you are a rock geek, better landing sites could have been chosen for some missions. I am still intrigued by all the ancient mythology of gods of mars, and for what was only a tiny dot in the sky back before telescopes, it sure influenced a lot for being a dot in the sky.
I know to many the whole 'Face' on Mars thing was debunked when better photos were taken but at the very least, I've often thought that even with the newer photos, the bilateral symmetry of the outline of the face was alone very artificial, who knows if it ever was an ancient monument that has eroded too much, but the outline still keeps its symmetry.
I think we can all agree that unless you are a rock geek, better landing sites could have been chosen for some missions. I am still intrigued by all the ancient mythology of gods of mars, and for what was only a tiny dot in the sky back before telescopes, it sure influenced a lot for being a dot in the sky.