• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

How I Almost Became a True Believer

Free episodes:

Charles Swenson

Cthonic Charlie, Chronic Curmudgeon
How I Almost Became a True Believer
by Charles Swenson​

I can’t really remember when I first became fascinated with the concepts of UFOs and flying saucers, but it is firmly embedded with images of the library branch where I read everything I could on the subject. This was back in the early ‘60s so it was almost exclusively nuts and bolts related, though by this time there was also a healthy dose of contactee material sprinkled in. Okay, healthy may not be the right analogy, but it was certainly a heady mix, especially when supplemented by the very real fact that we were also travelling into outer space at the time, reinforced by a steady ongoing diet of rockets and space suits in the press.

This fascination with flying saucers didn’t go unnoticed by my family. My siblings came to me all excited and told me that there was one outside, an excitement which was contagious and sparked me to come running out to finally see the visitors from beyond for myself. What I found there was their hilarious derision and laughter at my credulity, as well as healthy respect for the very real human capacity for deceit in the pursuit of a hoax, as well as an appreciation for a degree of skepticism about the claims of nonbelievers.

I cut my teeth on the Condon Report when it was published, which I took to imply that although there is much going on in the sky which can be misinterpreted, which when sifted through leaves a residual amount of strange phenomena which is still beyond our current understanding. Eric von Daniken was all the rage in high school, but following through in studying the cultural, anthropological and archaeological backdrop he was drawing made clear the height of the conclusions he was jumping to and supplied an Occam’s razor which cut like butter through most of his conclusions.
But it was the whole Bill Moore and Aquarius affair that put the subject to bed for me for almost three decades. With so many conflicting theories and what was clear even then as massive amounts of disinformation the field of ufology was becoming so muddied I put aside the subject. Oddly enough it this same affair which has sparked renewed interest in the whole field of ufoology (thanks to Jim Moseley for that oh so perfect term!) when Greg Bishop’s Project Beta added some much needed perspective on that truly bizarre episode. For me it closed one window but opened up a door onto what the late Robert Anton Wilson called maybe logic, that blessed state of being able to consider everything while believing in nothing.

It was in that same period that another formative event occurred, which has not only helped me understand the nature of becoming a true believer, but the emotional commitment and psychological burden such a belief system entails.

It must have been well over thirty years ago, walking back from a friend’s apartment on a road alongside Saint Edwards in Austin, one with an incredible panoramic overview of the city. It was late at night when I notice a light in the sky approaching from the west. It grew closer and brighter, and as it became clear that it was a series of moving lights. Coming ever closer it began to resolve itself as a series of colored lights that seemed to be moving horizontally beneath a solid surface.

I began to get quite excited about this, visualizing it in my minds eyes as lights rotating around the bottom of a classic disc shaped flying saucer. The implications of this were beginning to reshape my sense of what this implied, that the world would change for me as I went from being someone who had always had an interest in the subject to becoming a full blown believer, one of many of what was sure to be a widely viewed phenomena that would perhaps not only precipitate a major flap but mark the beginning of a mass landing. There was an emotional excitement of anticipation mixed with fear mixed with wonder, a waterfall of feelings running over me, drowning out whatever doubt the inner skeptic could muster because there it was before my very eyes. My whole world view was changing right there and then, some inner element of my psyche welcoming it as a childhood dream finally come true.

And still it grew closer, the lights and their apparent rotation clearer. At one point, however, it became clear to me what was really going on. I could now hear the drone of a small private plane's engine drone, and see that it was pulling behind it a lighted advertising banner with still unclear words scrolling across it.

And so my world changed again. It was, and remains clear to me now, that I have to be careful about allowing my preconceptions and residual belief systems guide my perceptions into seeing what I want to or expect to see. That much is clear, and it applies every bit as much when reading or hearing about the anomalous experiences of others.

But there is another, more frightening aspect to this experience. If that plane had turned sooner, before I'd been able to make out what it really was, I would now be one of those poor fools who run around trying to tell everyone about the UFO I saw, wondering why no else had reported it (or why the sighting was being suppressed) and getting sucked into the bizarrely puzzling world of a true believer in visitors from another world. That is scary.

But it has also helped guide my views on the UFO phenomena. Over the past couple of years I've returned to a fascination with that phenomena, though I feel compelled to say without the true believer's psychological baggage. But high strangeness has an attraction all its own, if for no other reason that as a social and cultural phenomena that may even have distinct applications by the military as a tool of misinformation in psychological operations.

One very clear example of this is covered in Greg Bishop's book, Project Beta, which has implications well beyond Kirkland Air Force Base using intelligence officers to feed a believer’s investigations of covert operations there, leading not only to his mental disintegration but feeding the UFO community a new mythology of underground bases at Dulce Mesa well away from the air base in Albequerque to divert attention. Another recent addition to the field is the fascinating Mirage Men, by Mark Pilkington, which is one of the most delightful, readable, and enjoyable accounts of the military's involvement in attempting to understand as well as manipulate the public's focus on unknown aerial encounters and belief in aliens over the past 63 years. And H.P. Albarelli’s A Terrible Mistake, about as well documented a book on MK-ULTRA as can be found, makes clear the degree to which government will go to hide its motives and methods, especially during the early days of the Cold War when its paranoia reached a degree that was not only pathological but bordering on the sociopathic.

But make no mistake about it, there is every bit as much paranoia and as many attempts to guide public opinion by true believers as well. What it is that the true believers believe in spans as wide a gap as the diehard skeptics on one side and the wide-eye New Age Naïf’s, Nazi nut-and-bolters, extraterrestrial exponents, ultraterrestrial underlords, transdimensional time travelers, abduction victimologists and far more evolving even as the anomalies emerge.

There is a cultural meme associated with this phenomena that is continually morphing and endlessly fascinating. The cost of admission to this freak show is minimal, but one must be endlessly cautious once inside the tent to remain part of the audience, for it is not always clear where the sawdust ends and the stage begins.
 
Welcome aboard.

---------- Post added at 03:16 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:01 PM ----------

Something similar happened to me a few years ago. For a split second I thought I might be seeing one. A white object zipped from the eastern part of the sky westward much too fast to be manmade. I stopped dead in my tracks and watched it but a second later it exploded into several white fragments which then disappeared. Just a meteorite. Damn it!
 
It's funny how we all seem to have followed similar paths into this subject. I also read the books in the local library junior section and moved through the 'grown-up' section. It's like we're somehow predisposed to be fascinated by something that most people find ridiculous or plain uninteresting from a young age. Sometimes it's clear that the one thing we all have in common is this perverse interest in something that has thwarted *probably* everyone for centuries.

I've seen two 100% certain UFOs and a couple of things that leave me wondering. I've believed in Meier (I was a kid!) and fell for a hoax at 19 that makes me cringe at the memory. It's all good grounding to be immersed in the subject without being committed to a 'yeay' or 'nay' position. Some might say that all this BS we see and experience and wonder about is part of the mechanism of the 'UFO phenomena's' motive of expanding our consciousness? I doubt that, but who knows?
 
It's funny how we all seem to have followed similar paths into this subject. I also read the books in the local library junior section and moved through the 'grown-up' section. It's like we're somehow predisposed to be fascinated by something that most people find ridiculous or plain uninteresting from a young age. Sometimes it's clear that the one thing we all have in common is this perverse interest in something that has thwarted *probably* everyone for centuries.

I've seen two 100% certain UFOs and a couple of things that leave me wondering. I've believed in Meier (I was a kid!) and fell for a hoax at 19 that makes me cringe at the memory. It's all good grounding to be immersed in the subject without being committed to a 'yeay' or 'nay' position. Some might say that all this BS we see and experience and wonder about is part of the mechanism of the 'UFO phenomena's' motive of expanding our consciousness? I doubt that, but who knows?

Some call that a will to believe. But I think there is a different sort of person, someone with a will to be interested. I consider myself the latter. I'll be the first to admit that there's just something in my DNA that predisposes me to be interested in these things. It makes me feel like a flake even saying it but I suppose I've always been one of those, "There's gotta' be more than this" kinda' people.

Because I'm drawn to far-out things I've looked at just about everything but have dismissed 99% of it. Nessie, Bigfoot, psychics, Bermuda Triangle, Philadelphia Experiment, etc. I was interested enough to take more than a peak but none passed mustard. UFOs have been the only thing to stick.

And goodness, when I first really got interested in UFOs in my early twenties I possessed no effective BS filter (It was good enough to toss aside other subjects but UFO scams proved to be a great deal more tricky.). I confess I fell for a lot of crap. I think my biggest problem was not so much in weighing the data as much as it was trusting the sources were being honest. I now know there's a lot of liars in this field.

But try as I might I still make mistakes. If asked several months ago about David Jacobs I would have said that compared to everyone else in the field he doesn't ask leading questions when conducting hypnosis. After all, for the 15+ years I'd been researching the topic (From an armchair, I totally confess.) I saw plenty of accusations but no examples. The questioning presented in his books and papers seems very well done, better in my opinion than the questioning of John Mack, an accomplished psychiatrist. Then I heard the Woods tapes and got to see a side to Jacobs' questioning I'd never been permitted to see before. After that I can only conclude that there may be nothing better about his questioning at all, just that someone like Mack was being more honest when putting together his transcripts for publication.

Like I said, it's a difficult field and it's tough to get it right all the time, perhaps impossible. Ya' live and ya' learn, I guess.
 
But there is another, more frightening aspect to this experience. If that plane had turned sooner, before I'd been able to make out what it really was, I would now be one of those poor fools who run around trying to tell everyone about the UFO I saw, wondering why no else had reported it (or why the sighting was being suppressed) and getting sucked into the bizarrely puzzling world of a true believer in visitors from another world. That is scary.

What a great post. I think you've nailed a very real psychological horror there. The horror of realizing just how incredibly vulnerable we are to self deception and how fragile our world-views can actually can be. When you realize this and think about the implications, you have to at least cast a suspicious eye at whatever current world view dominates your thinking at the moment. What would I be "believing" if I were not so quick to look away?
 
Good points in this thread. Part of what seperates the Paracast community from the true belivers and the hardened psudo skeptics. I have actually seen and can't explain what I saw. But, I'm still not a believer. So, I'm not sure that turning away at the wrong time will make you a vulnerable beliver. Depends on the person. I didn't turn away. Looked hard and simply don't accept it to be what it "seemed" to be. I guess I gotta actually run my hand over the craft and talk to the alien to be a true believer in "space" brothers. But, it's a fun conversation. :-)
 
I, too, as a child read everything I could about this subject (and many others of a "paranormal" nature.) I also had some strange experiences in my early childhood on into adolescence and early adulthood. I did become a "true believer" for a short time, listening to the likes of many who are in my "liars and complete morons" category now.

I think it's pretty easy to become duped in the UFO field if one doesn't use their wits. The field is full of questions and answers are few and far between. So opinions coming from people that speak the loudest, seem to carry some sort of authority. That's why guys like Horne and Greer and Hoagland and Lear get so much exposure; They're loud. Meanwhile there are some really good researchers out there that quietly toil and don't release any information or what they do release is insubstantial at best.

Then there are the debunkers who make less sense, sometimes, than the doe-eyed believers. They won't believe the evidence until it lands on their own front yard, and then they'll find a way to dismiss it.

So what to believe and how to believe it? Be skeptical and use common sense. That's really all I can suggest.
 
How I Almost Became a True Believer
by Charles Swenson​
[H]gh strangeness has an attraction all its own, if for no other reason that as a social and cultural phenomena that may even have distinct applications by the military as a tool of misinformation in psychological operations..
Ya think?
There is a cultural meme associated with this phenomena that is continually morphing and endlessly fascinating. The cost of admission to this freak show is minimal, but one must be endlessly cautious once inside the tent to remain part of the audience, for it is not always clear where the sawdust ends and the stage begins.
Well elucidated--but kinda sounds familiar.
 
I didn't turn away.

That was just one way of putting it. Conversely it could be "What would I believe if I had not dwelled so long?" or "What would I believe if I I had looked at X rather than Y?"

I think the acceptance of the given version of "consensus reality" a person is initially exposed to "sticks" with a majority of people.

Oh, and sweet Jesus, I have been a "true believer" in more than one irrational or ridiculous notion during my life. Coming to the realization that I'm by default pretty gullible and irrational has helped a great deal. :) Hey, it's a "feature" of being a human being.
 
I don't think it would have mattered with me. I lingered or I didn't. I just didn't jump to the spaceman spiff conclusion. :-)

---------- Post added at 02:34 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:26 AM ----------

The above sounds a little to flip. Sorry bout that. perhaps we are being visited by beings from another world or planet. It could be the military. I'm no debunker. But there are some things I guess you have to experience to understand. The abduction experience is more interesting to me than the ufo stuff.
 
Well, being interested in this subject or the paranormal in general still has a stigma attached to it, at least in my personal environment. I had some very very strange experiences whilst practicing 'ritual magick' (which in itself might be even more 'out there') , but in no way I'm telling that to my real life friends.

There are things between 'hell', 'heaven' and earth, what these really are...your guess is as good as mine.
 
But there are some things I guess you have to experience to understand. The abduction experience is more interesting to me than the ufo stuff.

I understand what you are saying, but I think it is a generality that really doesn't apply to the subject. The one thing that I think can be said to be absolutely true about paranormal eventsis that having the experience is more often than not no help in understanding it. At least that has been my experience anyway.
 
I don't think it would have mattered with me. I lingered or I didn't. I just didn't jump to the spaceman spiff conclusion. :-)

Good. I was thinking of things other than UFOs and paranormal whatisits though. I think C.S.'s observation goes beyond the "is it a UFO?" type experience and can be applied to other things in life. The basis for the acceptance of the reality of any given subject is not only a function of the amount of data available but just importantly the willingness to examine it.
 
You are so very right about there being a stigma attached to this whole paranormal field, for there are indeed some truly strange fruit growing there.

When writing the forerunner to "How I Almost Became a True Believer" my wife asked me what I was doing, and it was only with a great deal of trepidation and fear of ridicule that I was willing to reply honestly. Mind you, this is with a woman I've lived with for over thirty years!

Your reference to 'ritual magick' also struck a very real chord. I also have a history there, which is actually more of a history with other people who have shared similar interests, and there is one experience there that made it intensely clear that one must be very, very careful what one asks for. It reinforced a philosophy that has a great deal of wisdom behind it, about how happiness lies not in getting what you want but wanting what you get.

There is indeed much between heaven and hell and earth, as well as much in common with them all. As above, so below, and when we have one leg in the past and one in the future we have to ge careful not to be caught pissing all over the present.

Cthonic Charlie, the Cautious Curmudgeon
 
Back
Top