NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

Reply to thread

Message

For the sake of argument, l'll accept this is true, that he is funded by the oil industry. So we should reject what he says.

However, since what is good for the goose is also good for the gander, we should also reject every single scientist who receives government grants for pro-AGW research because the U.S. government is not giving grants to scientists who are skeptical or who oppose AGW. In fact, the oil industry can't even compete with the billions the U.S. government is giving out ONLY to pro-AGW scientists.

[QUOTE="BoyintheMachine, post: 194132, member: 2264"] For the sake of argument, l'll accept this is true, that he is funded by the oil industry. So we should reject what he says. However, since what is good for the goose is also good for the gander, we should also reject every single scientist who receives government grants for pro-AGW research because the U.S. government is not giving grants to scientists who are skeptical or who oppose AGW. In fact, the oil industry can't even compete with the billions the U.S. government is giving out ONLY to pro-AGW scientists. [/QUOTE]

Verification