NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

Reply to thread

Message

adaptability is what we specialize in. many will die, but the species will survive, even if it means they will have to subjugate and exploit the lower classes in even more bizarre ways than the elite do now, as they argue for full throttle, unfettered mining, mountain top removal, fracking and water damning wherever possible.

That all depends on your standards of unlivability. Many today live in unlivable standards off of garbage heaps, or in scraping heavy metals off of imported circuit boards (it's called international recycling ) or carting out oil from beached ships on the coastline, both busy getting cancer just so some of their family's next generation will be able to eat. Images of street youth and Inuit youth sniffing gasoline are also encouraging of where this is all going.

Perhaps, but only after a significant portion of deaths in the species, or if too many of the lower class is wiped out after the middle class disappears. Otherwisem what's the motive for going green? This thread has clearly established that environmental considerations, including the preservation of the diversity of species, is openly mocked as just the natural progression of what we do - kill things, other species and each other. That's the song the Koch Brothers' dad used to sing to them when they were still in their cribs.

<blockquote data-quote="Burnt State" data-source="post: 206407" data-attributes="member: 5332">adaptability is what we specialize in. many will die, but the species will survive, even if it means they will have to subjugate and exploit the lower classes in even more bizarre ways than the elite do now, as they argue for full throttle, unfettered mining, mountain top removal, fracking and water damning wherever possible.That all depends on your standards of unlivability. Many today live in unlivable standards off of garbage heaps, or in scraping heavy metals off of imported circuit boards (it&#039;s called international recycling <img src="/forum/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/wink.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" data-shortname=";)" /> ) or carting out oil from beached ships on the coastline, both busy getting cancer just so some of their family&#039;s next generation will be able to eat.&nbsp; Images of street youth and Inuit youth sniffing gasoline are also encouraging of where this is all going.Perhaps, but only&nbsp; after a significant portion of deaths in the species, or if too many of the lower class is wiped out after the middle class disappears. Otherwisem what&#039;s the motive for going green? This thread has clearly established that environmental considerations, including the preservation of the diversity of species, is openly mocked as just the natural progression of what we do - kill things, other species and each other. That&#039;s the song the Koch Brothers&#039; dad used to sing to them when they were still in their cribs.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Burnt State, post: 206407, member: 5332"] adaptability is what we specialize in. many will die, but the species will survive, even if it means they will have to subjugate and exploit the lower classes in even more bizarre ways than the elite do now, as they argue for full throttle, unfettered mining, mountain top removal, fracking and water damning wherever possible. That all depends on your standards of unlivability. Many today live in unlivable standards off of garbage heaps, or in scraping heavy metals off of imported circuit boards (it's called international recycling ;) ) or carting out oil from beached ships on the coastline, both busy getting cancer just so some of their family's next generation will be able to eat. Images of street youth and Inuit youth sniffing gasoline are also encouraging of where this is all going. Perhaps, but only after a significant portion of deaths in the species, or if too many of the lower class is wiped out after the middle class disappears. Otherwisem what's the motive for going green? This thread has clearly established that environmental considerations, including the preservation of the diversity of species, is openly mocked as just the natural progression of what we do - kill things, other species and each other. That's the song the Koch Brothers' dad used to sing to them when they were still in their cribs. [/QUOTE]

Verification