See i told ya mike would only bring us established solid science pixel 8.
I mean these guys have been doin this stuff for decades since 2011 and their records begin, but theres light at the end of the tunnel, lucky enough, these guys are consultants to major industries and they can 'advise them about 'earth strategy' targets.
They must be good 'advisers' and i doubt they charge hardly anything.
The bolded bit really rocks man, isnt great how humans band together to save the earth, and its all free.
"In the last four years we have worked closely with policymakers, industry and organisations to explore how the planetary boundaries approach can be used as a framework for sectors of societies to reduce risk while developing sustainably," Rockström says.
They specialise, they stay focused, so 4 years should enough time, heres 'their little list specialist subjects.
Nine planetary boundaries1. Climate change
2. Change in biosphere integrity (biodiversity loss and species extinction)
3. Stratospheric ozone depletion
4. Ocean acidification
5. Biogeochemical flows (phosphorus and nitrogen cycles)
6. Land-system change (for example deforestation)
7. Freshwater use
8. Atmospheric aerosol loading (microscopic particles in the atmosphere that affect climate and living organisms)
9. Introduction of novel entities (e.g. organic pollutants, radioactive materials, nanomaterials, and micro-plastics).
and and and and.
4Yrs work, 4 mins to debunk.
Red is wrong, and all shown clearly so in the last few postings temperatures havent rose for 19yrs, they shudda just asked NASA, instead of 4yrs research.
Blue is a nice old appeal to emotion ahhhh!
Green shows the difference in their opinion, depending on which study you read.
dohhhh
One study
As temperatures rise, extreme weather events are becoming more frequent and severe, crop and livelioods are being devastated, and the efforts of people on low incomes to feed their families are being undone. Those who are least to blame, are suffering the most.
Another study from them, no wonder mike gets all mixed up.
The real food crisis is of overproduction
There is no global or regional shortage of food. There never has been and nor is there ever likely to be.
India has a superabundance of food. South America is swamped in food. The US, Australia, New Zealand and Europe are swamped in food. In Britain, like in many wealthy countries, nearly half of all row crop food production now goes to biofuels, which at bottom are an attempt to dispose of surplus agricultural products. China isn’t quite swamped but it still exports food (see Fig 1.); and it grows 30% of the world’s cotton. No foodpocalypse there either.
Even in Bangladesh the farmers do not produce the rice they could because prices are low, because of persistent gluts.
Even some establishment institutions will occasionally admit that the food shortage concept – now and in any reasonably conceivable future – is bankrupt. According to experts consulted by the World Bank Institute there is already sufficient food production for 14 billion people – more food than will ever be needed. The Golden Fact of agribusiness is therefore a lie.
Obviously mikes guys like to be in a win win situation when it comes to selling their advice's.
.
