NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

Reply to thread

Message

Here's a thought. I wonder how many people on polar opposites of a debate really and truly read and study the provided "links" of their opponent? Yet, names are called and study after study after study is linked and all in the name of "science" or "reason" or whatever. Truth is (in my case anyway) I never, ever "study" very closely the link after link after link that somebody I don't agree with provides. They more than likely don't look that closely at mine. Now, if its a "pithy" little synopsis that I can understand and finish in a couple of minutes or less I will read it. Even link some stuff from it. But the ole "Go to imriteurwron.com" and read study after study that proves what in idiot you are for disagreeing with me? I never read those. Just a thought before you two bust a gasket.

<blockquote data-quote="tyder001" data-source="post: 114618" data-attributes="member: 853"><p>Here&#039;s a thought. I wonder how many people on polar opposites of a debate really and truly read and study the provided &quot;links&quot; of their opponent? Yet, names are called and study after study after study is linked and all in the name of &quot;science&quot; or &quot;reason&quot; or whatever. Truth is (in my case anyway) I never, ever &quot;study&quot; very closely the link after link after link that somebody I don&#039;t agree with provides. They more than likely don&#039;t look that closely at mine. Now, if its a &quot;pithy&quot; little synopsis that I can understand and finish in a couple of minutes or less I will read it. Even link some stuff from it. But the ole &quot;Go to imriteurwron.com&quot; and read study after study that proves what in idiot you are for disagreeing with me? I never read those. <img src="/forum/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/smile.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":-)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :-)" data-shortname=":-)" /> Just a thought before you two bust a gasket. <img src="/forum/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/smile.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":-)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :-)" data-shortname=":-)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="tyder001, post: 114618, member: 853"] Here's a thought. I wonder how many people on polar opposites of a debate really and truly read and study the provided "links" of their opponent? Yet, names are called and study after study after study is linked and all in the name of "science" or "reason" or whatever. Truth is (in my case anyway) I never, ever "study" very closely the link after link after link that somebody I don't agree with provides. They more than likely don't look that closely at mine. Now, if its a "pithy" little synopsis that I can understand and finish in a couple of minutes or less I will read it. Even link some stuff from it. But the ole "Go to imriteurwron.com" and read study after study that proves what in idiot you are for disagreeing with me? I never read those. :-) Just a thought before you two bust a gasket. :-) [/QUOTE]

Verification