• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

Identifying Manipulated Images

Free episodes:

macavity

Skilled Investigator
Thought the following article might be of interest:

http://www.technologyreview.com/Infotech/20423/?a=f

Photo-editing software gets more sophisticated all the time, allowing users to alter pictures in ways both fun and fraudulent. Last month, for example, a photo of Tibetan antelope roaming alongside a high-speed train was revealed to be a fake, according to the Wall Street Journal, after having been published by China's state-run news agency. Researchers are working on a variety of digital forensics tools, including those that analyze the lighting in an image, in hopes of making it easier to catch such manipulations...
 
i would like to use that software on this image. i am fairly certain it is faked but still not 100% certain. it was brought to me by a local surgeon who said he was taking a picture of the bridge (cropped out to reduce file size) and thing popped up out of the water then submerged and took off like a fish in shallow water. he said the part visible was about 2-3 feet in diameter and stuck up out of the water about 2 feet.
[attachment=139]
 

Attachments

  • mutant.jpg
    mutant.jpg
    22 KB · Views: 0
pixelsmith said:
i would like to use that software on this image. i am fairly certain it is faked but still not 100% certain. it was brought to me by a local surgeon who said he was taking a picture of the bridge (cropped out to reduce file size) and thing popped up out of the water then submerged and took off like a fish in shallow water. he said the part visible was about 2-3 feet in diameter and stuck up out of the water about 2 feet.

My question is - even if you could authenticate the picture, what does it tell you?

For what it's worth, it looks like a chunk of concrete perhaps wedged on another piece of concrete that's lying flat on the river-bed.

When I go walking, I often pass shallow streams and ponds which do have lot's of half-submerged junk visible above the water-line - if I took a picture of some of these things, I'm sure I could create a story to support the idea that they're not 'what they seem'...

...just an observation.
 
If it's fake, my guess is someone pasted in a picture of a Mud Skipper...

...the easiest way to achieve it would be to throw a large stone into a pond, take some snaps of the ripples and then 'paste in' an up-scaled image (with an inverted reflection).
 
it does look like a mudskipper. it would have to be about 12 feet long if real. the water in that spot is about 4 feet deep. i wonder if the good doc was playing with photoshop.
 
Back
Top