Han
piscator ψ
Dear Paracasters, I have always been fascinated by the way "we" attach "emotions" to inanimate objects, both in a positive and negative way. For example cursed dishwashers, or lucky coins.
I for one am guilty of buying into these ideas, for example I have a "lucky" stick, which when I write about it here seem ridiculous, but I would not part with it for all the money in the world (figure of speech obviously) but I do genuinely treasure it, because of when, where and how I found it.
I have seen similar behaviours in animals too, the one that springs to mind is one day I went to visit a huge reservoir, when me and a friend arrived, we went to the bailiffs hut to inquire about the fishing regulations. Anyway to cut a long story short, the Bailiff had a very large Alsatian dog (German Shepard) and as I was standing there it began to stare at my feet and growl, I was not a little worried due to the size of this dog, and asked the owner what was wrong, he replied you are standing on his "favourite" stone, which was confusing to say the least, he then said take a step back, which I did, immediately the dog walked forward and with great dexterity picked up a small reddish pebble in its mouth and took it to its owner to throw like a ball. My jaw dropped the stone in question was no larger than a marble and was quite similar to the surrounding pebbles, however when the owner threw the pebble the dog retrieved it and bought it back to him, he then said you have a go which I did, I took great care to ensure that inspected the stone thoroughly before throwing it, and when I did the dog bought back the exact same stone! it is not an understatement to say that there were literally thousands of similar stones in the area that I threw it, but somehow the dog was able to recognise "his" stone time and again.
I wish I had asked how long the dog had "owned" the stone in question or if he had more? However it was only when looking back did I realise how remarkable it was.
In this thread I would like help to explore the dynamics of the way we attach emotion to objects, the question that intrigues me the most is how much impact does the actual object in question have? and to what extent does what you "know" or are "told" effect the way you "feel" about it?
For example if we take a wedding ring (for clarity a plain gold "band" without inscription) and examine it without provenance we might conclude that it was just a "ring" however if we were told that it once belonged to an ancestor, relative or "important" (to us) person how might our feelings towards it change?
Any input or examples would be most welcome.
I for one am guilty of buying into these ideas, for example I have a "lucky" stick, which when I write about it here seem ridiculous, but I would not part with it for all the money in the world (figure of speech obviously) but I do genuinely treasure it, because of when, where and how I found it.
I have seen similar behaviours in animals too, the one that springs to mind is one day I went to visit a huge reservoir, when me and a friend arrived, we went to the bailiffs hut to inquire about the fishing regulations. Anyway to cut a long story short, the Bailiff had a very large Alsatian dog (German Shepard) and as I was standing there it began to stare at my feet and growl, I was not a little worried due to the size of this dog, and asked the owner what was wrong, he replied you are standing on his "favourite" stone, which was confusing to say the least, he then said take a step back, which I did, immediately the dog walked forward and with great dexterity picked up a small reddish pebble in its mouth and took it to its owner to throw like a ball. My jaw dropped the stone in question was no larger than a marble and was quite similar to the surrounding pebbles, however when the owner threw the pebble the dog retrieved it and bought it back to him, he then said you have a go which I did, I took great care to ensure that inspected the stone thoroughly before throwing it, and when I did the dog bought back the exact same stone! it is not an understatement to say that there were literally thousands of similar stones in the area that I threw it, but somehow the dog was able to recognise "his" stone time and again.
I wish I had asked how long the dog had "owned" the stone in question or if he had more? However it was only when looking back did I realise how remarkable it was.
In this thread I would like help to explore the dynamics of the way we attach emotion to objects, the question that intrigues me the most is how much impact does the actual object in question have? and to what extent does what you "know" or are "told" effect the way you "feel" about it?
For example if we take a wedding ring (for clarity a plain gold "band" without inscription) and examine it without provenance we might conclude that it was just a "ring" however if we were told that it once belonged to an ancestor, relative or "important" (to us) person how might our feelings towards it change?
Any input or examples would be most welcome.