• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

Intelligence Agencies-UFO Research

Free episodes:

Decker

Administrator
Staff member
In 1993, we (at UFO Magazine) received a package from a group calling themselves AIG or Associated Investigators Group. It made some very unsettling allegations against some very well known names then in UFO research. I recently was engaged in an email discussion with Gary Bekkum (Starpod.org) about this. The following was the news story I wrote about this and then some PDF's of intelligence docs Gary sent me. As an aside I then interviewed Bruce Maccabee on my radio show about the allegations. I still maintain that there is a strong interest by intel. agencies in the UFO research field, regardless of how screwed up it is.

Decker

Intelligence and UFO Research
by Don Ecker/Director of Research
*UFO Magazine Vol. 8 No. 5 -- All rights reserved.
*****************************************************************

During the third week of July, 1993 *UFO Magazine received a
written report from an organization calling itself the
"ASSOCIATED INVESTIGATORS GROUP". There was no return address on
the envelope, and the members listed on the back were all
pseudonyms. Some of the pseudonyms were fairly easy to figure
out, some were not. However the report itself was extremely
inflammatory. The first paragraph read; "One of the nation's
leading sponsors of UFO research and investigation, the Fund for
UFO Research, has had a long-standing secret relationship with
the CIA and the U.S. Intelligence community. Dr. Bruce Maccabee,
an optics and laser specialist with the Naval Surface Weapons
Laboratory near Washington, DC, one of the Fund's founders and
member of the group's Executive Committee, has been secretly
meeting with CIA officials since 1979, briefing them about
various UFO matters and investigators."

*UFO Magazine immediately called the Fund for UFO Research
Chairman Richard Hall to get the Funds stance on these
allegations. Hall right off stated that he had just spoken with
Todd Zechel, one of the primary accuser's alleging CIA
connections with the Fund and Dr. Maccabee. Zechel denied being
the sole author of the document, but according to Richard Hall,
refused to name the other authors.

Hall stated when asked that the Fund was aware of contacts that
Maccabee had within Central Intelligence, but had not been aware
of any extensive relationships. When asked by Hall if he felt
there may be other "moles" in the Fund for UFO Research he stated
"No I don't and I have to say that I think this has a potential
to be over blown. All we are dealing with here are some fairly
major indiscretions by Bruce Maccabee." When asked if Hall
thought Maccabee would have reported back to the Agency on
persons in the field he said "I have no way of knowing, is the
honest answer, but I sort of doubt it because my reading of his
personality and character". "In 1979 Bruce went to New Zealand
for, I think it was NICAP, it wasn't for the Fund, and when he
came back he told us that he had briefed some people at CIA on
the case. As the years went by Bruce said he had talked to CIA
people and had contacts over there. When it became obvious that
they were ongoing things several members of the board met with
Bruce and told him this wasn't right, we can't have you going
over there and talking privately with those people. We are
dedicated to the position of getting information out on this
subject and this will look bad, you can't do it. We told him this
could backfire on the Fund, we had no idea of how deeply involved
he was."

According to the document from the ASSOCIATED INVESTIGATORS
report, and from Richard Hall, the point man at CIA that Maccabee
knew was Roland "Ron" Pandolfi, Directorate of Science and
Technology. Hall stated that "making some inquiries of my own, he
(Pandolfi) is notorious for dealing with a whole bunch of people
in the field. He is probably dealing disinformation in the
field."

Hall then stated for the record that because of many of
Maccabee's favorable statements about the Gulf Breeze case, the
Fund was unable to do any balanced presentation of negative
information about the case because the Fund had asked several
people to report on it and they refused because of reservations
about Maccabee.

Maccabee recently vacated the Chairmanship of the Fund for UFO
Research when Richard Hall took over. Maccabee is still a member
on the Board.

Todd Zechel was next contacted. When asked what initiated the
release of the ASSOCIATED INVESTIGATORS REPORT, Zechel said the
report was done because Maccabee was found to have briefed CIA in
Langley on May 28th, 1993. The briefing was, according to Zechel
on "residual magnetic effects found in the Gulf Breeze incident."

Zechel stated "I knew Bruce quite well in the seventies. I got
started in the field in 1976 and I always respected and admired
him because he seemed to be a very responsible scientist. He was
very cautious and not making outrageous pronouncements." "One of
the concerns we had with all this is was that Maccabee felt more
loyalty to the CIA than he did to his friends at the Fund."
Zechel was then asked why the names listed on the report were all
pseudonyms and not the actual persons involved. He said "The
basic reason is stated in the last page of the report. There are
several confidential investigation going on, and when they are
completed the people will then be identified." Zechel then said
that "I may as well put my name on it since I will be blamed for
it anyway."

"One of the inferences that you can draw from the situation is
that before 1979 was quite cautious, seemingly afraid that he
might loose his government classified research job, and after
1979 when he began meeting with the CIA he seemed to abandon all
those cautions, and got involved with a lot of things that
seemingly going up against the government. Being one of the lead
sponsors of the MJ-12 investigation. If MJ-12 was legitimate,
which I don't believe it was, then Maccabee was certainly taking
a number of risks with his security clearance. The fact that
nothing happened to him obviously indicates that no one was
displeased with what he was doing."

One of the main points Zechel presented concerned the aftermath
of Maccabee's New Zealand trip, and his briefing at CIA. Maccabee
told Zechel on the record that he had met the CIA's custodian of
the UFO files. Zechel states he has Maccabee telling him on audio
tape that this unnamed CIA officer had told him (Maccabee) that
the Agency had over 15,000 UFO documents. Zechel had brought this
point up twice as he told *UFO "This was a critical point because
we were in the middle of litigation with the CIA and we were
trying to prove the CIA had lied to the court, and lied about
their search (for records). Obviously this was a major crime if
they have filed all sorts of affidavits to the U.S. District
Court swearing that their total files consisted on only about
1,000 documents."

The contact at CIA that Maccabee had that purportedly told him
about the 15,000 documents was Dr. Christopher C. "Kit" Green.
Green is now reportedly chief of Biomedical Sciences Dept. at
General Motors. His replacement at CIA is now Roland "Ron"
Pandolfi in the Directorate of Science & Technology.

Later Zechel said that while speaking to Maccabee he asked him if
he were working for the CIA. According to Zechel Maccabee stated
"You might say that." Zechel said that with Maccabee's background
he was recruited by the CIA to work on classified national
defense work involving "Star Wars". This in would fit into normal
governmental contract work given Maccabee's background in optical
physics and his expertise.

Zechel was asked about the allegation in the AIG report that
Maccabee was identified as a member of the infamous "Aviary" (Sea
Gull) of UFO researcher William Moore. When asked how this was
verified Zechel stated "It was verified through him (Maccabee) to
me within the last month. (July 1993) He talked about receiving a
form message from Bill (Moore) in which Moore had sent a memo out
to the Aviary that U.K. researcher Armen Victorian was doing an
investigation on the "birds", and the memo stated to not worry
about it, no one was worried about being exposed. Maccabee told
me that it was funny that Moore said no one was afraid of being
exposed, no one asked him, and he was afraid of being exposed!"

*UFO then called Dr. Maccabee. Maccabee was told that *UFO had
called Richard Hall at the Fund, and that Hall had verified that
the Fund was aware of his involvement with the CIA since 1979,
and that Hall had told Maccabee that they were afraid that if
this was publicly known it could reflect back on the Fund.
Maccabee stated that "I have a professional relationship in the
sense of what I do, and in particular I was working on lasers,
and I became of interest to them in 1984. This UFO stuff came up
as topics of mutual interest. This paper (AIG) misrepresents
things and that is one of many things." Maccabee was asked if he
did contact CIA in 1979. Maccabee stated he did brief CIA on his
New Zealand investigation. However Maccabee stated that the
report was wrong about him contacting CIA. "Coming back from New
Zealand, I had looked for help in my analysis, or for people to
review what I had done in terms of the radar aspects of the New
Zealand case. I had told Jack Acuff of NICAP I would be
interested in technical experts in radar. I learned from Jack
there was a scientist with major credentials with a corporation.
He had become aware of NICAP because of sonic booms, like sky
quakes, which were taking place at the time (in the late
seventies, after the Concord starting flying.) People were
phoning in reports about these booms, and were seeing lights in
the sky. The scientific community got interested, and the guy I
ended up talking to, Gordon MacDonald, decided to do an
investigation with the Naval Research Laboratory, and they found
to their dismay that most of the information that is available is
in the files of UFO groups. So they contacted NICAP among others
for information, so that is how MacDonald got in touch with NICAP
and Jack Acuff. When the New Zealand case came along, I was given
this guy MacDonald. I met with him and he agreed with some of my
conclusions and offered a couple of suggestions. About a week or
so later, he called and asked if I would like to brief some
people at the CIA where they had other radar experts. I said ok,
and then a guy from the CIA called up and invited me to come
over. Apparently MacDonald had contacted the CIA on his own. So,
here on this report (AIG) is a paragraph which is written in a
slanted and fabricated manner."

Maccabee was asked if it were true that after the New Zealand
briefing he was taken aside by a CIA official and reveled to him
that this man was custodian of UFO files, and that these files
consisted of close to 15,000 documents, and then later on at some
point he (Maccabee) later retreated from that statement. He said
"Yes there is" and then he was asked if it were Dr. "Kit" Green,
Maccabee said yes but he never mentioned the name. "Zechel found
that out on his own."

"After the briefing, this Green asked me if I would come back and
we can talk about the UFO situation in general. I was interested
knowing that the government and CIA had just coughed up a bunch
of documents, and he may have wanted to talk about the subject
for his own reasons whatever they were. I went back again and
sometime in the conversation we got into the documents. From what
I recall and I do not recall it specifically, Green probably said
there were many more documents, maybe as many as 15,000
documents. At any rate what is left out of this (AIG report) is
what happened afterwards. I told Zechel about that because I knew
he was dealing with that lawsuit. I thought he should know there
might be more documents. I did not know of Zechel's independent
information. Zechel had a covert source of his own. Plus, Gersten
(Zechels attorney) had been led to believe by the CIA attorney
there might be 10,000 pages." Maccabee stated then that in
conversations with Green, Green told him that he personally only
personally had approx. 1,000 documents.
cont. next page
 
cont. from above

Maccabee's denial to Robert Hastings occurred in 1979 as opposed
to the AIG report which states 1990. Maccabee stated "As far as a
denial to Hastings, he had no need to know what I was doing 7 or
8 years beforehand. I was not about to spread it around, and it
is very possible I denied it, I do not remember."

When asked how with his job and security level, and with his
public and private UFO interest, how could he continue with his
UFO investigations and not be censored and not suffer the
consequences that others in government service have suffered with
a public UFO interest. Larry Bryant was one example offered.
Maccabee said "I just played it cool, Larry did not play it as
cool. He started sending around paid advertisements to armed
service newspapers, and when some of them wouldn't publish his
stuff he got mad and sued them and stirred up a big stink." "I
never knowingly passed any disinformation, nor was I given any
information or disinformation to pass."

Maccabee was then asked if it were true that as late as May 28th,
1993 if he had once again briefed interested parties at CIA on
the magnetic effects of the Gulf Breeze case and he answered
"yes". Maccabee was asked if he had passed on information to CIA
on any cases or personalities in the research community. "What I
have done is talk to people that are interested in the subject on
material that they could get elsewhere. At one time they were
interested in tracking what was on bulletin boards (computer),
with Lear and Cooper (Milton) and all that. I did not tell them
anything that was not in the open literature. The Gulf Breeze
briefing is a case in point, it was a lunch time talk, anyone
could come to it,
secretaries, street sweepers or the heads of covert departments,
whatever. I did not know who showed up. CIA invites lots of
people on lots of subjects and they will talk to people that are
interested in those subjects. I been there a couple of times just
like it said in this paper."

Maccabee then stated that another misrepresentation in the AIG
document concerned the years from 1979 to 1983. The paper states
that Maccabee had a continuous and ongoing relationship with CIA.
"FALSE" he stated. After the spring of 1979 I did not have ANY
dealings with CIA until after 1983. In 1984 I was contacted by
Pandolfi in regards to my work. I was asked to come over and give
a briefing on my work which I did. Nothing about UFOs. I do not
talk about UFOs unless the person I am talking to is amenable to
it." After Maccabee gave the presentation on his work, he said
that Pandolfi asked him about his 1979 presentation on New
Zealand. "I couldn't deny it" Maccabee said, and "after that we
got into conversations on the subject".

"The implication of this document" said Maccabee, "is that I had
continuous and ongoing relations with the CIA all the way through
and that I was supplying information to the CIA on UFO stuff for
years and years. This is not true."

The one area where Maccabee was not open concerned the question
about his being SEA GULL in William Moores aviary. Maccabee
claimed he did not know if he were SEA GULL. When asked if he had
received any documents addressed to SEA GULL he maintained he did
not know.

After conducting a number of interviews, I do not think there was
any malicious intent on Maccabees part, but without a doubt some
poor judgment. Walt Andrus was contacted to see if MUFON had any
position on this. Andrus said that MUFONs position was "It is not
a crime to talk to the CIA, after all they are a part of America
to." Without a doubt they are, however after almost 50 years of
lies and deceit where the UFO subject comes in, and considering
historical events like the Robertson Panel, it is time for the
government to come clean with the information on hand. There is a
phenomenon, it has apparently interacted with human-kind for
years. Agencies like CIA have hidden behind national security
with information on UFOs, while claiming that UFOs do not
threaten national security. You can't have it both ways and
undoubtedly Maccabee will be another casualty in the long line of
people who tried to have it both ways. Somehow only the
phenomenon and the intelligence services seem to win this one.

--end of file--
Next, two recovered intel. memo's


http://www.foia.cia.gov/sites/default/files/document_conversions/89801/DOC_0000015235.pdf


http://www.foia.cia.gov/sites/default/files/document_conversions/89801/DOC_0000015490.pdf
 
This is an example of the same BS that has dogged this field since the field was first acknowledged. The crap stays the same, the only difference is the names occasionally change.

Decker
 
I have always been unimpressed with Macabee. In my opinion he was on the wrong side of two very obvious UFO hoaxes. The first being Gulf Breeze, and the second being "The Guardian Tape." In both instances Macabee emphatically declared that the visual evidence shown in those two cases was clearly ET. I was never impressed with either of those cases. The Gulf Breeze "craft" looks like a rickety trashcan with holes cut in it. It has uneven windows as if it was a 1960's ocean liner. This is very crude technology for an advanced ET craft. In fact if you were to compare the image of the Gulf Breeze craft next to our Stealth fighter, you can see, visually, it does not meet the criteria of an advanced space craft (see attached). The stealth fighter was developed in the 70's and first used in the opening phases of the 1st Gulf War. Despite its apparent age, it looks far more sophisticated than Ed Walter's saucer. Moreover, anyone familiar with cameras can think up 100 ways to create an image similar to Walter's. Double Exposing the film would be one way. Macabee's inability to distance himself from his personal beliefs about this subject tainted his objectivity when it came to this case, or as Don alludes to, perhaps he was involved with some agencies which required him to herald clearly false cases. Who knows. The Guardian UFO tape is really unsubstantial, I don't understand how anyone with a legit Ph.D in optical anything could conclude what you are seeing in that video is a flying saucer. It has a pretty earthly strobe light attached to the top of it. I see no reason why at UFO from outer space would need, what amounts to, headlights or a 20 dollar Radio Shack strobe.
 

Attachments

  • comp1.jpg
    comp1.jpg
    40.5 KB · Views: 7
This is an example of the same BS that has dogged this field since the field was first acknowledged. The crap stays the same, the only difference is the names occasionally change.

Decker

Don, do you think it's possible that Bruce was a CIA employed confederate from the beginning? Doesn't it seem ridiculous to you that the CIA would be at all interested in public based UFO research when they have umpteen thousands of times more so discreetly potential research channels to pursue? I simply cannot for one minute imagine them gleaning any real and useful information based on Bruce's covert go between. IMO, the planned acknowledgment of as much would seem to be an impressive stage setter that would effectively serve to underline their overall ignorance of the UFO phenomenon. One that ultimately lowered their world intelligence community perceived profile with respect to their potential understanding of the matter. Almost in a sense giving them the perceived appearance of a pathetic and laughable underling in the scheme of knowing anything at all. I don't buy that for a minute.
 
Don, do you think it's possible that Bruce was a CIA employed confederate from the beginning? Doesn't it seem ridiculous to you that the CIA would be at all interested in public based UFO research when they have umpteen thousands of times more so discreetly potential research channels to pursue? I simply cannot for one minute imagine them gleaning any real and useful information based on Bruce's covert go between. IMO, the planned acknowledgment of as much would seem to be an impressive stage setter that would effectively serve to underline their overall ignorance of the UFO phenomenon. One that ultimately lowered their world intelligence community perceived profile with respect to their potential understanding of the matter. Almost in a sense giving them the perceived appearance of a pathetic and laughable underling in the scheme of knowing anything at all. I don't buy that for a minute.

You totally missed the point. First you must recall the time frame of that period. UFO research even with all the frauds, was very dynamic and there were some serious people in the mix. Why would any intel people be interested in Maccabee or Bill Moore or even John Lear then? Because they would have an "in" thru them to report on people in the field who were then doing some serious research. That was one of the reasons I grilled Bruce then about what he talked about with members of CIA or who-ever. People were under the microscope and they were people like Len Stringfield, Stan Friedman, up and comers in the new internet like Paranet, myself and UFO Magazine. When I broke the STS 48 story on national TV the following day NASA encrypted the live feed they had been using on shuttle missions and I was told shortly after I had upset the DOD very much with that story. Don't kid yourself, I was there and saw what was going on. And there is something else that must be looked at. We always felt that the intel people, now and again, floated bull shit stories just to see how much traction they might get with the UFO crowd. Dis-information projects floated into the mix and then people like Maccabee and Moore would tell their contacts how such stuff was either accepted or discarded. There is a boat-load more to this subject than simple "saucers and ET's". Something to consider.

Decker
 
It's no secret that the FBI once had a file with the names of UFO interest groups and it wouldn't surprise me to find out that every UFO interest group today is on an intelligence database someplace. It also seems that UFO interest groups tend to attract anonymous suppliers of "inside information". USI was once approached by some alleged "insider agency" that offered to take me into their confidence provided that I shut down the USI website. Naturally I refused unless I was shown some credentials and/or compelling evidence. None ever came. But soon afterward my PC was hacked and our member database destroyed. Then I started getting visits a couple of times a year by MIB types pretending to be religious canvassers, then a whole list of other odd things started happening that can probably be explained as coincidences, but just seem a little too coincidental.

It all makes me wonder if the ufology community makes an attractive target for intelligence interns. Ironically they probably don't even know the truth about UFOs themselves and think we're just fun subjects for their homework. If they really wanted to know what's going on, they'd be sniffing out the trail over at Space Command. That's obviously where the real information trail begins. Where it ends is another story. It's someplace off in the shadows where guys like John Alexander don't get to go ( notice he doesn't talk much about Space Command in his book ).
 
You totally missed the point. First you must recall the time frame of that period. UFO research even with all the frauds, was very dynamic and there were some serious people in the mix. Why would any intel people be interested in Maccabee or Bill Moore or even John Lear then? Because they would have an "in" thru them to report on people in the field who were then doing some serious research. That was one of the reasons I grilled Bruce then about what he talked about with members of CIA or who-ever. People were under the microscope and they were people like Len Stringfield, Stan Friedman, up and comers in the new internet like Paranet, myself and UFO Magazine. When I broke the STS 48 story on national TV the following day NASA encrypted the live feed they had been using on shuttle missions and I was told shortly after I had upset the DOD very much with that story. Don't kid yourself, I was there and saw what was going on. And there is something else that must be looked at. We always felt that the intel people, now and again, floated bull shit stories just to see how much traction they might get with the UFO crowd. Dis-information projects floated into the mix and then people like Maccabee and Moore would tell their contacts how such stuff was either accepted or discarded. There is a boat-load more to this subject than simple "saucers and ET's". Something to consider.

Decker

Hi Don,
Thank you for replying directly to my point. I respect you tremendously Don. There will never be anyone that participates on this forum that doesn't owe you (and many others) HUGE.

This *is* my point, and please allow me to express the fact that I honestly understand I could be be completely off with it, but I really don't think so after many years of focused speculation.

Don, I don't believe in "spacemen" or "ET". I used to. I am 50 and frankly was reading Däniken books in the 4-5th grade, was glued to our black n white TV set when Nimoy's ISO show was making it's first runs. All without losing the least bit of interest in the phenomenon between then and the time when all the 80s to early 90s and beyond videos starting flooding and fueling the UFO information boom scene. I fully realize that you yourself were involved in the making and unfolding of this very informative catalyst. I am not placating you when I state quite matter of factually that we "owe" you a great deal.

This is what I have come to speculatively accept with the greatest of respect and sincere interest in the matter as a whole:

Mankind, or humanity if you will, is roughly 4 - 6 evolutionary platforms (meaning both physical and knowing in the learned sense) removed from it's original inception. You and I, we represent one of the newer stages or platforms of this lineage. What does this mean?: Mankind, by means of either self inflicted nuclear destruction, or natural cataclysmic event, has experienced approximately 6 extinction level events in the course of it's existence.

Our observations of UFOs are technological products of Mankind's oldest evolutionary platform. This technological level of understanding is thousands of years beyond you and I, as representatives of our stage of development. The planet earth to us, is our home. In our stage of evolutionary development, we are bound to it physically and temporally. To the earliest and oldest stages of mankind's evolutionary path, the Earth represents a baby's cradle, but a very precious cradle nonetheless. Some of the earliest stages of Mankind's evolution make their home here, concealed apart from public knowing. This is a tiny representation of a far and away larger multiple stage population that dwell in an environment that to them is as naturally navigable as is the Earth to us. We call this, their environment, the Universe. Indeed via our evolutionary stage's best present understanding, we only perceive a tiny portion thereof because of our limited orientation to the construct we presently occupy as related to us temporally, materially, and physically organic.

Most of the technologies that we witness as UFOs within our evolutionary staging could only be described by us at this point as being quasi spiritual technological manifestations, or even more so primitively accepted as being pure magic. With respect for our indigenous stage of scientific development, to the best of my understanding, we have just begun to scrape the embryonic surface of relevant technological developments that would facilitate such a working understanding in application. Indeed, our present evolutionary stage's understanding of as much is barely removed from the cave's of our most primitive ancestors.

UFOs, and indeed all sentient observations made by this populated stage of evolutionary development, of that which we call "paranormal", represent quasi localized observations of temporally bound and unbound evolutionary staging.

At the same time that this all represents a practically unfathomable knowing, it demonstrates a perfect and natural simplicity in unity with all natural progressive law.
 
You certainly have an interesting take on the topic. I understand what you propose but have difficulty in accepting it on the whole. That is not to say that there might not be "something" to it but I am aware of too many cases where there was concrete evidence that "something" made a physical appearance.

Back in the early to latter 90's I was firmly in the "nuts and bolts" camp but later my thinking on the subject changed. That is not to say that I discarded the idea that some cases, at least to my satisfaction, suggested that there was a nuts and bolts aspect to the case. However I began to think that some cases had a much more ethereal aspect to them, something suggesting an "other worldly" aspect that was very hard to nail down. Be that as it may, and regardless of what the core of the topic represents, the "spooks" out there in UFO wonderland still like to keep tabs on we great unwashed seekers of the ufo truth. If for no other reason, just to see what the hell we are up to.

Decker
 
Excellent research Don and wonder why you left this field. Also the so called spooks most likely have a right to keep tabs on those who would sell out there nation don't blame them on that one. Also wonder if the so called spooks were looking for the so called ET? as the late Ingo Swan saw among the field? I enjoy the Paracast and Darkmatters on the grounds there's more to life than this field and find the UFO subject serous from a national security point if these objects master/controller's are nasty bastards! Those who believe in a marshmallow ideology these encounters are appear as savours live in a pipe bubble of love.
 
You certainly have an interesting take on the topic. I understand what you propose but have difficulty in accepting it on the whole. That is not to say that there might not be "something" to it but I am aware of too many cases where there was concrete evidence that "something" made a physical appearance.

Back in the early to latter 90's I was firmly in the "nuts and bolts" camp but later my thinking on the subject changed. That is not to say that I discarded the idea that some cases, at least to my satisfaction, suggested that there was a nuts and bolts aspect to the case. However I began to think that some cases had a much more ethereal aspect to them, something suggesting an "other worldly" aspect that was very hard to nail down. Be that as it may, and regardless of what the core of the topic represents, the "spooks" out there in UFO wonderland still like to keep tabs on we great unwashed seekers of the ufo truth. If for no other reason, just to see what the hell we are up to.

Decker

Don,
I agree with you completely. There is, with regard to the best of my hypothetical speculations, *no* question that what might be termed "real UFOs" (and of course those sightings belonging to our own black programs or possibly even high level privately funded R&D) represent a very much working scientific based technology. The difference here is that this real UFO technology that we cannot at this point even begin to grasp, is what I would imagine to be a quasi, or more so analogously parallel in nature to what we commonly refer to as "hybrid technology" in which multiple technological means are systematically combined to achieve a specific, or even a diverse number of tasks. At very least providing a means by which they have transcended every notion, of what we ourselves have up until present scientifically put forth, with respect to outer space propulsion or air friction based, physical distance measured, travel and navigation.

In the same sense that we as a primitive organism, far and away removed from our present status of being, left the oceans millions of years ago, they too have left the confinement of what we understand as our native physical spacetime relevance. This does not mean that they are not still organic human beings. Nor does it specifically imply that they are in any real way different in appearance from us. Rather their brains have developed sentient willful control of natural faculties that have for them long become environmentally relevant to their existence, technological orientation, and subsequent actuation. In a primitive sense, this being no different than what our stage of evolution recognizes as the basic adaptively progressive sentient sophistication of refined rational expression and acute cognitive abilities. Such as speech, mathematics, empathy, & complex memory based analysis and formative processing and reason.

Back on point, and thoroughly inline with your reasoning concerning the physical attributes that have at times been made evident via the UFO phenomenon, IMO there is no question, these are intelligently controlled technologies that by means of an extremely advanced human specific volition, facilitate a scientific paradigm that we at our stage of development may not demonstrably experience for hundreds, if not thousands of years.

I do believe that at the highest echelon of organized intelligence, there is a very real knowledge of as much, even possibly direct communication with as much if only at their discrete behest. However, I do not believe it's their modus operandi to take sides, nor to interfere directly in a controlling sense with us. However, possibly a case in point being these nuclear missile shut downs and inexplicable offline status reports from various global military bases, I believe there are times when we are manipulated into be forced to recon that there is more at stake within the universe than just this evolutionary stage of mankind's impulsive volition and his very much mutual existence. I think they have honestly gotten out attention more than once with respect to possibly massive destruction. I believe that they intentionally keep us scratching our heads, if only to subtly summon on condition one of mankind's rarer reflective virtues. Namely, humility. One can only hope.

Thanks Again Don! :)
 
Don:

You're doing a great service to the field of ufoology (thanks to the late Jim Moseley for such an appropriate term!) with work like the article at the top of this page. The interest intelligence agencies shows in the field seems to open windows into a dark corner of rooms in the puzzle palace that little is clearly known about, and every time the curtain is pulled back a little further by articles such as yours a little more light is shown on the subject. And as the passage of time shifts the angles of the light shining in a bit more is revealed each time that curtain is pulled back.

It's very good of you to share this material some twenty years later, since so many have come into the field long after it was first published. Your skills honed as a law enforcement officer trained in finding the bull by following the bullshit have come in handy here.

My current fascination with the field is as a sociocultural phenomena which has metamorphosed into a meta-meme that tends to color and distort any attempts to see it clearly. But it was Greg Bishop's "Project Beta" that opened my eyes to the degree to which society's conceptions and perceptions of this meta-meme have been utilized as a tool by intelligence agencies, entirely aside from the validity of whatever it is that is producing these phenomena. Mark Pilkington's Mirage Men: An Adventure into Paranoia, Espionage, Psychological Warfae and UFOs is another important book, dealing with the level of obfuscation that continues to plague the field. To quote the trailer, "This is a true story about UFOs and a government who denied their existence, then wanted people to believe in them."


So every bit of information you have to offer is greatly appreciated. I'm starting to follow more of Gary Bekkum's work along similar lines due to his recent appearance on the show, and look forward to more of your fine reporting on these matters.

Thanks so much...
 
Back
Top