• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

Iran’s Flying Saucer Downed U.S. Drone, Engineer Claims

Free episodes:

Christopher O'Brien

Back in the Saddle Aginn
Staff member
[What will those Iranians think of next? :) ---chris]

Article HERE:
Late last month, Iran put on display what it insisted was a captured American stealth drone. At the time, Tehran claimed it brought down the RQ-170 with a sophisticated electronic attack. Nonsense, says one Iranian engineer who claims to have inside knowledge of the drone-nab. The Islamic Republic used force fields and flying saucers to subdue and capture the unmanned aircraft.

Meet Mehran Tavakoli Keshe, who purports to be the father of the RQ-170 abduction. In a recent post to his eponymous foundation’s online forums, Keshe claims the Iranians used “advanced space technology” that he pioneered. “The craft has been air-picked-up and been put down on its belly through the use of field forces,” Keshe writes — by which he means force fields...

‘The Defense Secretary would like his lightsaber back.’ The rest is HERE:

IranUFOdrone3.jpg
 
Its a fascinating example of using UFO's as propaganda, we all know its long been suggested that the US may have promoted "stories" about UFO's to keep the russians second guessing.
This seems to be another twist on that meme.
I dont know if they have such technology, but the very question thats left hanging, ie do they or dont they is perhaps the point of the exercise, an excercise thats been suggested before on the part of the US military.

The defence secretary can have his lightsaber back, when he prys it from my cold dead fingers

022-1.jpg
 
Some interesting stuff here

http://www.keshefoundation.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=2209&start=0

http://www.keshefoundation.com/en/m...ation-and-space-exploration-plasma-technology

Turns out they have been looking at Polywell reactors

The Iranian Connection
A research report has been published discussing Polywell study progress in Iran at the Plasma Physics and Nuclear Fusion Research School, Nuclear Science and Technology Research Institute, AEOI, Tehran, Iran. The report states that OOPIC simulations as well as physical testing has been conducted. The study suggests that well depths and ion focus control can be achieved by variations of field strength. The report further references other research with physical test articles, where in Iran specifically, a IECF machine has run in continuous mode at -140KV with 70mA of current, with D-D fuel, producing 2x10^7 neutrons per second. It is noted that the specified machine has not been identified as a Polywell configuration. Other referenced studies indicate 10 fold improvements in fusion yields using ion sources.[45]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polywell

Now this Keshe fellow appears to be based in belgium

Mehran T. Keshe of the Keshe Foundation, who on that momentous day had sent out notice to government leaders around the world that he has a plasma technology in Belgium with anti-gravity (not his terminology) and energy-generating ramifications that could lead the way to commercially viable journeys into space and to the moon, along with generating affordable, renewable energy both for transportation and electricity.

So his claims about the iranian capture of a US drone, strike me as odd. I havent found anything yet that links the two. But who knows..........
 
i wondered to myself when i first heard of this event , would their be any reason why the U.S. wanted this drone to be downed and captured perhaps as a way to get intell on their capabilities , or maybe another reason. why wouldn't the damn things just have some kind of self-destruct device on it or even have that capacity from mission control (nevada?) to keep the technology from being compromised? why worry about spies turning over state secrets when all we have to do is launch one of our weapons over enemy territory then do nothing to stop it from falling into the wrong hands?
 
Back
Top