Dr. Jacobs and Budd seem very earnest and serious about their work, but at about 35:30 into the program Jacobs says something which seems kinda telling. He says that abductees generally answered one of his questions one way, and non-abductees generally answered it the other way. And I've heard him say that very same thing in other interviews as well.
That's called "begging the question". It is a logical fallacy. (The term is often used loosely in everyday speech to mean something slightly different.) It is closely related to circular reasoning:
"How do you know abductees have this experience?"
"Because they answered the question this way."
"But how do you know those people were abductees?"
"Because they said they had that experience."
You start by assuming that, one, there is such a thing as alien abduction in the first place, and second, that a particular subset of your sample are abductees, and voila, you've got it.
Another case of "Look, you guys seem quite reasonable and friendly, and your hypothesis is worthy of investigation, but boy oh boy there's this big hole in your logic that I need you to address before I'll be convinced."
--Shawn
That's called "begging the question". It is a logical fallacy. (The term is often used loosely in everyday speech to mean something slightly different.) It is closely related to circular reasoning:
"How do you know abductees have this experience?"
"Because they answered the question this way."
"But how do you know those people were abductees?"
"Because they said they had that experience."
You start by assuming that, one, there is such a thing as alien abduction in the first place, and second, that a particular subset of your sample are abductees, and voila, you've got it.
Another case of "Look, you guys seem quite reasonable and friendly, and your hypothesis is worthy of investigation, but boy oh boy there's this big hole in your logic that I need you to address before I'll be convinced."
--Shawn