• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

Reply to thread

One of the things that started to eat away at me was the whole problem of special pleading. I started to ask myself, "Why did the religion I was born and raised up in and which dominated my culture and even national identity to a great extent, have any more validity or truthfulness behind it than any of the other religions being practiced on the planet?" It is hard to get past without a great deal of mental gymnastics, rationalization, and religious faith. Religious faith here being a belief held despite the lack of evidence or in the face of contrary evidence based on the perceived veracity of the source. God X is real but gods A,B, and C are all not because the believer holds a religious faith in god X but not A,B, or C. To declare god X the one and only true god all gods must be evaluated with equal rigor. Just attempting to engage in that exercise led me to conclusion that all gods (supernatural non-human beings who require worship, obedience, and claim to be our creators) by virtue of their alleged natures (essentially transcendent)  are restricted to the realm of the human imagination.


Back
Top