NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

Reply to thread

Message

Early on, Erica makes the statement that for an archivist it is ok to remain anonymous, but when one is "coming to conclusions and voicing your opinions" (I assume she means as a researcher) it is necessary to use a real name. Which is pure epistemic poppycock.

Also, much later in the program, Chris implies that most of the questions from the forum relate to gender issues. I was wondering if he (or Erica) read my not-gender-related comment and would like a chance to comment here?

[QUOTE="CuCullen, post: 252980, member: 8682"] Early on, Erica makes the statement that for an archivist it is ok to remain anonymous, but when one is "coming to conclusions and voicing your opinions" (I assume she means as a researcher) it is necessary to use a real name. Which is pure epistemic poppycock. Also, much later in the program, Chris implies that most of the questions from the forum relate to gender issues. I was wondering if he (or Erica) read my not-gender-related comment and would like a chance to comment here? [/QUOTE]

Verification