Jeff Peckman: Romanek setup to fail by religious polygraph examiner

[Gareth]

This Peckman guy is such a fucking douche bag.

Denver UFO Examiner: UFO contactee Romanek ‘set-up’ by polygraph examiner to fail

This guy told me that he would repeat the same question over and over until he found a questionable response to use. He told me that he wouldn't let them film him just in case and that he had a 'moral obligation to stop the blasphemer', as he put it! He then told me it took him nine tries before he found one he could use against Stan. By the time I was finished talking to this nut I wanted to hit him, there is no justice in this world!

If this is true, then fine. But it doesnt ring true to me at all.

Goddam it makes me angry. This guy was on Letterman? This field is screwed. It has no hope of gaining acceptance and interest from the public.

HOW DID HE GET ON LETTERMAN?

 

[Tommy Allison]

Stupid human tricks. That's how he got on Letterman.

Letterman loves having someone on, who he can watch make an ass out of themselves.

 

[Stillborn]

I was puzzled when hearing some quotes from the examiner awhile back. I think I heard part of a C2C show where the polygraph results were given. He would consider Stan had failed, even if he passed 99 percent of the questions. He only required 1 failed response. That seemed weird to me. Correct me if I'm wrong, but most examiners don't seem to be that hell bent. Or are they?

Having said that, Peckman is far from credible and is highly deluded. Pity when I don't trust either side. Makes coming to conclusions a lot harder for me.

Speaking of Letterman. I got the impression his show was ending. At least the Bill Hicks show of late was said to be the last. But there's been more shows I think. Jaoquin (Sp?) Phoenix was recently on I saw. I think it was after the Hicks show. Weird interview btw, check it out on youtube.

 

[Ron Collins]

It sounds to my like someone forget to take his "Metatron Personal Harmonizer" with him to the interview. I mean if he had he would have easily been able to thwart the evil forces deployed against him with the "10-foot bubble of coherent life-supporting Divine Light around the person carrying this card. Any non-life supporting energy that enters this bubble is instantly transformed into coherent life-supporting energy (which, by the way, totally transforms chaotic EMFs into coherent energy)."

What a pitty. I'll bet he starts taking it with him more often now!

 

[Gareth]

I was puzzled when hearing some quotes from the examiner awhile back. I think I heard part of a C2C show where the polygraph results were given. He would consider Stan had failed, even if he passed 99 percent of the questions. He only required 1 failed response. That seemed weird to me. Correct me if I'm wrong, but most examiners don't seem to be that hell bent. Or are they?

Having said that, Peckman is far from credible and is highly deluded. Pity when I don't trust either side. Makes coming to conclusions a lot harder for me.

Speaking of Letterman. I got the impression his show was ending. At least the Bill Hicks show of late was said to be the last. But there's been more shows I think. Jaoquin (Sp?) Phoenix was recently on I saw. I think it was after the Hicks show. Weird interview btw, check it out on youtube.

I think Conan Obrien is ending. First Ive heard of Letterman ending (But that Hicks show was definitely not the last).

edit- looks like Jay Leno is making way for Conan O'brien to host The Tonight Show, and Leno is getting a new later show in the Fall.

Television | Here's Leno: New show may be a lot like the old | Seattle Times Newspaper

Coujldnt find anything about Letterman retiring though.

 

[David Biedny]

Letterman is not retiring, the Joaquin Pheonix shtick was a put-on (he's been watching old Andy Kaufman videos, he was in character), and Jeff Peckerman is absolutely and completely full of shit.

Next question...

dB

 

[Stillborn]

Letterman is not retiring, the Joaquin Pheonix shtick was a put-on (he's been watching old Andy Kaufman videos, he was in character), and Jeff Peckerman is absolutely and completely full of shit.

Next question...

dB

I heard it may be a publicity stunt for a mockumentary he and I think Casey Afleck are doing. About an actor turning rapper. Others say he's on drugs.

 

[Gareth]

I heard it may be a publicity stunt for a mockumentary he and I think Casey Afleck are doing. About an actor turning rapper. Others say he's on drugs.

Yeah Casey Affleck is following him around with a camera. It was completely obvious that Phoenix was 'acting' on Letterman.

Im not sure whats going on with the rap career though. I think there may be more to it than we have been told. (the whole thing may be a stunt)

 

[Zandroid]

They have not even started to make this so called documentary. What an annoying case, Romanek should be taken to court for fraud.

 

[Stillborn]

They have not even started to make this so called documentary. What an annoying case, Romanek should be taken to court for fraud.

Sued for a dvd that isn't made yet? Or has he made money elsewhere? I can't recall if he's done the lecture circuit for money or not.

 

[Gareth]

Sued for a dvd that isn't made yet? Or has he made money elsewhere? I can't recall if he's done the lecture circuit for money or not.

Actually when I heard Romanek on the Paracast I remember thinking that he sounded somewhat credible. I wonder if he has just made some bad decisions in associating himself with Peckman and others. David, could you get him back on the show?

Who knows, maybe he WAS given a raw deal re: the polygraph exam.

 

[Stillborn]

Actually when I heard Romanek on the Paracast I remember thinking that he sounded somewhat credible. I wonder if he has just made some bad decisions in associating himself with Peckman and others. David, could you get him back on the show?

Who knows, maybe he WAS given a raw deal re: the polygraph exam.

Stan needs to sever certain ties and release his "evidence". I've seen some of his earlier evidence. Some of it seemed promising to me. But as time goes on, the case is getting more and more laughable.

Were you around when Capn posted a brief segment of the peeping alien vid? Seemingly the real one. Just wondering who all saw it or not. Unfortunately, I didn't have the real audio download button at the time, so I didn't dl it to my hard drive. Then again, I lost everything on my pc since then anyway, so I wouldn't have it today. Anyone out there have a copy of it to show people who missed it? The vid didn't last long before being pulled. I really don't have much of an opinion on the vid itself. I'd need to see more than just a head to be convinced, at the very least. But it wasn't as bad as the Alien interview, or Reed/Rutter's alien lol. I'll give him that at least.

 

[Zandroid]

we will never know its all a tease, the video will not be shown

ever

 

[thefoundryman]

The polygraph examiner, Glenn R. Knipscheer, knew prior to conducting the test, that Romanek had been previously diagnosed with three different health disorders. Any one of these disorders would have given an examiner justification to disqualify Romanek from taking the test, in accord with the code of ethics for polygraph examiners. ...........would not then, this article be moot point.
I seem to remember Romanek was on the paracast, I'm gonna have a re-listen, because Romanek seems to me like a victim and Peckman is a victimizer. Is there any truth to Romanek's accounts? I seem to remember thinking that the guy should have called anybody else BUT "Peckerman" in order to showcase his experiences.
Am I wrong here people?

 

[Stillborn]

The polygraph examiner, Glenn R. Knipscheer, knew prior to conducting the test, that Romanek had been previously diagnosed with three different health disorders. Any one of these disorders would have given an examiner justification to disqualify Romanek from taking the test, in accord with the code of ethics for polygraph examiners. ...........would not then, this article be moot point.
I seem to remember Romanek was on the paracast, I'm gonna have a re-listen, because Romanek seems to me like a victim and Peckman is a victimizer. Is there any truth to Romanek's accounts? I seem to remember thinking that the guy should have called anybody else BUT "Peckerman" in order to showcase his experiences.
Am I wrong here people?

Not sure if Stan called Peckman ever. If you re-listen to the show, it becomes a little more clear Stan and Peckman's relationship. This assumes Stan isn't lying of course and is being honest and accurate.