NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

Reply to thread

Message

That's why I want you to watch this program. Maybe you can spot some errors or mistakes. You claim to be an expert about the entire reasoning this is an organized conspiracy of some kind, but I do want to ask you please to just focus on this one aspect, which you yourself have made an issue out of it. Not me.

There are many reasons WHY some secret groups or individuals would want to assassinate any President. I'm sure there are many reasons well documented why JFK would be a target too. Even Oswald said he was a patsy, but he had already attempted to assassinate another military person in the area too. [Unless that is a lie or fabrication.] Oswald definitely had a troubled background that might allow him to do what he did. He was an opportunist that just happened to be at the right place and time. Coincidences do happen even if he had reasons to do it or be a patsy too.

Ford and Reagan were almost assassinated by lone actors too, and these were even more up-close attacks. Did these people act for conspiratorial reasons too? Whether mentally ill or not, they certainly had their perceived valid reasons for doing it. Oswald certainly would have a lot of reasons to do what he did too. All of these people could easily have had conspiracy ideas in their head, and that is why Oswald may have said he was a patsy too. That does not mean some specific group or person willfully pushed their buttons to do the deed. It could be indirect associations with his strange background, even with people that did not like JFK or might want him dead, but Oswald may have done all the connecting the dots on his own to do the murder when the random chance opportunity presented itself.

JFK made the fatal mistake of driving in an open car, when it would be well known himself that he could be a target. He should not have taken such chances knowing he was a very controversial President challenging the PTB with his reforms. Was he just naive and foolish about it, or did he take risks he should not have taken? His AG brother knew there were risks too, so it is really tragic he is killed too. We live in an extremely violent society, so Presidents will always be targeted.

<blockquote data-quote="DissectionStalker" data-source="post: 226388" data-attributes="member: 7253">That&#039;s why I want you to watch this program. Maybe you can spot some errors or mistakes. You claim to be an expert about the entire reasoning this is an organized conspiracy of some kind, but I do want to ask you please to just focus on this one aspect, which you yourself have made an issue out of it. Not me.There are many reasons WHY some secret groups or individuals would want to assassinate any President. I&#039;m sure there are many reasons well documented why JFK would be a target too. Even Oswald said he was a patsy, but he had already attempted to assassinate another military person in the area too. [Unless that is a lie or fabrication.] Oswald definitely had a troubled background that might allow him to do what he did. He was an opportunist that just happened to be at the right place and time. Coincidences do happen even if he had reasons to do it or be a patsy too.Ford and Reagan were almost assassinated by lone actors too, and these were even more up-close attacks. Did these people act for conspiratorial reasons too? Whether mentally ill or not, they certainly had their perceived valid reasons for doing it. Oswald certainly would have a lot of reasons to do what he did too. All of these people could easily have had conspiracy ideas in their head, and that is why Oswald may have said he was a patsy too. That does not mean some specific group or person willfully pushed their buttons to do the deed. It could be indirect associations with his strange background, even with people that did not like JFK or might want him dead, but Oswald may have done all the connecting the dots on his own to do the murder when the random chance opportunity presented itself.JFK made the fatal mistake of driving in an open car, when it would be well known himself that he could be a target. He should not have taken such chances knowing he was a very controversial President challenging the PTB with his reforms. Was he just naive and foolish about it, or did he take risks he should not have taken? His AG brother knew there were risks too, so it is really tragic he is killed too. We live in an extremely violent society, so Presidents will always be targeted.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="DissectionStalker, post: 226388, member: 7253"] That's why I want you to watch this program. Maybe you can spot some errors or mistakes. You claim to be an expert about the entire reasoning this is an organized conspiracy of some kind, but I do want to ask you please to just focus on this one aspect, which you yourself have made an issue out of it. Not me. There are many reasons WHY some secret groups or individuals would want to assassinate any President. I'm sure there are many reasons well documented why JFK would be a target too. Even Oswald said he was a patsy, but he had already attempted to assassinate another military person in the area too. [Unless that is a lie or fabrication.] Oswald definitely had a troubled background that might allow him to do what he did. He was an opportunist that just happened to be at the right place and time. Coincidences do happen even if he had reasons to do it or be a patsy too. Ford and Reagan were almost assassinated by lone actors too, and these were even more up-close attacks. Did these people act for conspiratorial reasons too? Whether mentally ill or not, they certainly had their perceived valid reasons for doing it. Oswald certainly would have a lot of reasons to do what he did too. All of these people could easily have had conspiracy ideas in their head, and that is why Oswald may have said he was a patsy too. That does not mean some specific group or person willfully pushed their buttons to do the deed. It could be indirect associations with his strange background, even with people that did not like JFK or might want him dead, but Oswald may have done all the connecting the dots on his own to do the murder when the random chance opportunity presented itself. JFK made the fatal mistake of driving in an open car, when it would be well known himself that he could be a target. He should not have taken such chances knowing he was a very controversial President challenging the PTB with his reforms. Was he just naive and foolish about it, or did he take risks he should not have taken? His AG brother knew there were risks too, so it is really tragic he is killed too. We live in an extremely violent society, so Presidents will always be targeted. [/QUOTE]

Verification