trainedobserver
Paranormally Disenchanted
I found this to be very interesting. Zecharia Sitchin theories are discussed by Jonathan Gray in the first segment.
-
NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!
Jonathan Gray on Sitchin, etc.
- Thread starter trainedobserver
- Start date
Free episodes:
ALPHA ROMEO UNIFORM
Whittingham
Intresting theories and Mr Sitchin theories do seem to suggests all its not what it seems:exclamation: and its good to question everything :exclamation: by using free speech or you end up with a NAZI state
bbridges
Paranormal Maven
Intresting theories and Mr Sitchin theories do seem to suggests all its not what it seems:exclamation: and its good to question everything :exclamation: by using free speech or you end up with a NAZI state
Since it seems to have been removed, could you summarize what Mr. Gray had to say? I am curious. RSarradet
Kandinsky
Curious Cat
---------- Post added at 04:21 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:54 PM ----------
Basically...
Gray began to see flaws in Sitchin's accounts of Sumerian texts. He was concerned, for example, by the ridiculous notion that Nibiru had a 3600 year orbit. So he looked through the Sumerian texts and couldn't find any reference that supported Sitchin's claim. He then found other errors in his work and questioned why Sitchen's *translations* differed so much from the established Sumerian dictionaries and translations (the best....404 Not Found
Rather than thinking Sitchen was hoaxing or lying, Gray felt that he himself was somehow in error and contacted Sitchen for clarification. Two months later he received a reply from Sitchen that deflected from the questions he asked. Other letters were equally vague and meaningless.
For the life of me, it's never made any sense that Sitchin has had so much success and so many people supporting his claims. I've had fiery online debates with people who vehemently defend him despite his lack of evidence and conflict with facts. Not just the poorly educated either, I've debated some people who seem to be fairly well-informed and intelligent. There's no internal logic to his stories, they don't coincide with the academic research and they fly in the face of planetary mechanics. They even live in a little historical vacuum where the world wasn't populated by literate civilised peoples with a history of astronomy. Even 3600 years before now, the Chinese, Egyptians, Greeks, Phoenicians etc etc couldn't have failed to notice (and record) a bloody great planet cruising through the skies!
He sounds like a kindly old man and likely harmless. He's feathered a pretty nice nest out there in NY too. He's pulled the wool over a lot of people's eyes, but they are people who choose to let it happen.
vonmazur
Skilled Investigator
I am curious, did not someone else say the same thing about Stichin? I cannot find the site right off, but it was called; "Stichin is Wrong" or something like that....:question:
The lack of other cultures having reported what Stichin claims is enough for me...Especially in China, where they observed and reported a lot of stellar and astronomical information...
Dale
The lack of other cultures having reported what Stichin claims is enough for me...Especially in China, where they observed and reported a lot of stellar and astronomical information...
Dale