Joseph P. Farrell on Coast....

[Simonemendez]

Sunday night-into-MondayAM, 3-14-to-3-15, Ian Punnit had Joseph P. Farrell on Coast-To-Coast. It was AWESOME. SO MANY people called in and were holding, (including myself) that this guest stayed on the show for it's entire duration. Ian said, "Not many guests" had been kept on for that long. I myself got on with Farrell, in the first half hour of THE LAST HOUR of the show. So those with 'Streamlink' can hear that.
These past three years, I have been questioning the staid 'conventional wisdom' I held about Ufos, for 3 decades. Very----currently, I am wondering if NOT ONLY the Ufos-Are-Aliens-In-Spaceships-from-other-planets has been a profoundly deeply societal-psychie inculcated PSYOP from Intel, to divert away from Third Reich originated exotic technology, BUT ALSO the abduction phenomen as well? A manufactured hysteria, that has taken root, taken on a life of it's own, and therefore, seemingly very real,----to not only 'abductees, but Ufologists, as well?
What do you all think of that?

 

[Gene Steinberg]

Sunday night-into-MondayAM, 3-14-to-3-15, Ian Punnit had Joseph P. Farrell on Coast-To-Coast. It was AWESOME. SO MANY people called in and were holding, (including myself) that this guest stayed on the show for it's entire duration. Ian said, "Not many guests" had been kept on for that long. I myself got on with Farrell, in the first half hour of THE LAST HOUR of the show. So those with 'Streamlink' can hear that.
These past three years, I have been questioning the staid 'conventional wisdom' I held about Ufos, for 3 decades. Very----currently, I am wondering if NOT ONLY the Ufos-Are-Aliens-In-Spaceships-from-other-planets has been a profoundly deeply societal-psychie inculcated PSYOP from Intel, to divert away from Third Reich originated exotic technology, BUT ALSO the abduction phenomen as well? A manufactured hysteria, that has taken root, taken on a life of it's own, and therefore, seemingly very real,----to not only 'abductees, but Ufologists, as well?
What do you all think of that?

Farrell has always been a possibility for the show. The key is to develop questions that will put his statements in the proper light and exact the facts, whatever they might be.

 

[Simonemendez]

Farrell has always been a possibility for the show. The key is to develop questions that will put his statements in the proper light and exact the facts, whatever they might be.

I don't have internet at home, (my own choice) and I do not normally go out of my way, to go and listen to an internet radio show, at one of my local Libraries computers. HOWEVER(!) If you were to achieve the above interview, I would go out of my way with earbuds in hand, to try and take a listen to that'un, fer sure!

 

[ALPHA ROMEO UNIFORM]

Farrell has always been a possibility for the show. The key is to develop questions that will put his statements in the proper light and exact the facts, whatever they might be.

Hi Gene,

Dr J Farrell,
Is a very interesting historical 'NAZI' researcher who actually uses references in his books and gives a plausible suggestions to the rather abundant Et Roswell story. Maybe, a Mr J Farrell & Mr Jim Marrs special ?

CIAO,
blowfish

 

[Poi]

Thanks for reminding me, Simone. I'm still a streamlink subscriber for listening to Ian and George Knapp. I fell asleep as Farrell was introduced and forgot to try to catch the show today. This should be really interesting.

 

[Tom From Hong Kong]

Thanks for reminding me, Simone. I'm still a streamlink subscriber for listening to Ian and George Knapp. I fell asleep as Farrell was introduced and forgot to try to catch the show today. This should be really interesting.

As a sidenote, I have honestly never met someone who is a George Noory supporter -- George Knapp and Ian Punnett yes, but never Snoory. How does he stay on the air? (that's a rhetorical question . . . ).

 

[Gene Steinberg]

As a sidenote, I have honestly never met someone who is a George Noory supporter -- George Knapp and Ian Punnett yes, but never Snoory. How does he stay on the air? (that's a rhetorical question . . . ).

He comes across as a nice guy and doesn't offend anyone (except perhaps your intelligence). That can count for an awful lot, you know. Some say, however, that he'll stay on the show until they can find the end of his mustache, and that's gonna take a few years.

 

[paraschtick]

I just want to take this opportunity to say nooooooo please noooo to the Jim Marrs/Joseph P Farrell programme. No no no ... non nein. Marrs is a conspiracy theorist of the worst kind. Jumps on one bandwagon after another. Dr Farrell is someone who seems to follow things through properly logically and thoughtfully. He is a historian by trade [oh bugger ... so is Dr Jacobs ... ] ... and is always a fascinating listen. Also Jim Marrs has a beard and gets frequently mistaken for an intelligent person.

So please no. Please please noooooo.

Ahem ... but it really would be nice to have some sort of discussion about what the Nazis were up to at the end of the war since if Dr Farrell is to be believed they had some amazing kit ... and which may be some way to explain part of the UFO phenomenon. Especially The Bell and the ideas surrounding Einsteins (disregarded) Unified Field stuff. I'd also like to hear more about the death ray they built in the basement of the University of Heidelberg ... but then again ... wouldn't we all ??

 

[Poi]

As good an interviewer as Ian is, whoa, the questions left for a Paracast interview! I agree, Farrell needs all the time and attention you can give him, Gene.

I'm going to have to read a couple of his books I'd been avoiding because I don't buy his Giza death-star theory. But his latest theory on the Roswell/Nazi connection begins to sound plausible from the cited sources he manages to insert in the interview.

The rest? Explosive.

I hesitate to even mention his theory that victims of projeria might have flown the downed craft because that's where I finally groaned out loud. Admittedly, I thought people suffering projeria died too early to fill the bill, but Wikipedia tells me differently.

But still ... if Farrell hadn't interviewed or researched someone who says Brazel originally said the craft had Japanese characters and Roman numerals on its exterior, I'd have turned the computer off at the very minute he mentioned the possibility of the pilots having a condition that made them light in weight, with small facial features and large foreheads. Projeria is a rare enough condition that finding a number of them would be difficult, I think. I'm sorry. It's still a huge stretch for me. Even if the occupants spoke three languages, German, Spanish and Japanese. Yeah, it's all there in the book.

But what is cited is too interesting to pass up, like the lightweight material found at the crash site. Farrell found a patent granted in 1932 for similar material so it isn't the big mystery it's purported to be?

There may be a lot of hard evidence that's too delicious to pass up.

 

[trainedobserver]

As a sidenote, I have honestly never met someone who is a George Noory supporter -- George Knapp and Ian Punnett yes, but never Snoory. How does he stay on the air? (that's a rhetorical question . . . ).

Ah-ha! Do you think it might be angels?

Sorry ... I couldn't resist the temptation.

 

[marmer]

I didn't hear the interview, although I have heard several others with Farrell and read as many of his books as I can get my hands on. He is quite firmly in my gray basket. On the one hand, he has an earned doctorate in early Church history and is a retired college professor, and he also has made a pretty darned thorough study, for an amateur, of advanced physics. I tend to consider him a fairly "expert" source in the study and interpretation of ancient texts. On the other hand, he tends to be willing to believe some things which are often not considered credible. Two that come to mind are the "secret Nazi base" explanation for the earlier-than-planned end of Operation Highjump and his fondness for the work of Zachariah Sitchin.

His stories of the interplanetary war in early Earth history and advanced Nazi technology are, in the words of Nick Pope, "interesting if true." Even if I find him a little credulous, it's hard to argue with the ideas that early human history is quite different from what we commonly believe is true and that there still are some secrets remaining from the end of WWII; and those make him worth listening to.

 

[Simonemendez]

Yes Marmer, my eyebrows went up, at some-----of the crazy-sounding things Farrell said. These uber-high IQ types, (I'm [easily] assuming that about J.F.) as ingenious as they are, are often weird though. (Though I can't find anything mentaly weird about Stephen Hawking so far). Unfortunately, however, there is this noticeable history of people going kinda off the deep end, once they stay in Ufology and conspiracies, no matter what their status! (Not me though! I have 'issues', but not like some!) (I.e. Jacobs.....( he ).. )

 

[paraschtick]

... I tend to consider him a fairly "expert" source in the study and interpretation of ancient texts. On the other hand, he tends to be willing to believe some things which are often not considered credible. Two that come to mind are the "secret Nazi base" explanation for the earlier-than-planned end of Operation Highjump and his fondness for the work of Zachariah Sitchin ...

Yeah I have a few problems with him in that respect too. Some of his early books use Zitchin but apparently later on he uses academically reknowned translations of Sumerian texts (??). I meant to send him an email and ask him whether or not he still is ok with Zitchin or not. IF he is, then it opens up an enormous vat of worms. I hope that isn't the case.

And although he has mentioned the Operation Highjump and to some extent accepts it as truth, I don't think he has mentioned it that much (??) [I've only read a couple of his books and heard numerous interviews with him so I can't comment further].

There is a website in which Highjump is totally taken apart, and is very interesting reading. I'll have to see if I can find it again.

I also have problems with the Giza stuff but there are so many questions about the Giza pyramids I go back and forth on the point that why can't it be true what he is saying??

Still if he is deluded, he's is deluded in a completely thoughtful and very interesting way

[Oh and there is also this website which I still haven't fully gone through which is an interesting read: http://www.sitchiniswrong.com ]



---------- Post added at 12:41 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:28 PM ----------

Aha here we are. Here's the thing I was talking about:

http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=648112

It be from the University of Cambridge and it be authored by Messrs Colin Summerhayes and Peter Beeching.

The full thing can be found here on scribd:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/25311/Hitlers-Antarctic-Base-the-Myth-and-the-Reality

[remember to login/register with scribd to download the article]

Very interesting stuff and completely buries the Nazi Antarctic Base idea [but then again ... of course they could be lying ]

 

[Poi]

Oops. Spelled progeria incorrectly. After making my post in this thread, I found a blurb on the net about the condition quite by accident. Think there was a show on TV last night about two little girls who live with it. The blurb said there are only 58 people in the world living with progeria currently. I'm hung up on that angle because Farrell is, as mentioned, a solid researcher and highly intelligent, but we all listen with an ear for the ... don't know what to call it ... the too-much-factor. Rankles me that he's, imo, truly able to go off the deep end when it comes to plain old common sense. If he really needed a lightweight crew, why not the more numerous Little People? Or pygmies or goodness sake?

But I'm not suggesting he wouldn't be a good guest nor that we can throw out all of what he has to say simply because he's willing to go to extreme lengths to make a point. What he's found in the way of documentation and even eye witness testimony alone is worth a listen. I'm just warning people who didn't know much about him how he can throw a can of worms, big, squirming, night crawlers into the mix.

I've always doubted an alien crash took place anyway so it's interesting to get closer to what I imagine is the truth, secret technology of some sort was covered up. I can't take it farther than that, but Farrell seems to have found evidence of it, whether I agree with his theory or not.

 

[Kieran]

I don't think it was Nazi technology that crashed at Roswell that doesn't seem right to me. The evidence the Mr Farrell presented has been public knowledge for years, you just had to investigate it to find this out. Many German citizens who worked for the Nazis certainly fled after the War, since most of Europe was occupied by the Allied forces or the Russians. It no surprise to me, most of this German Citizens therefore fled to America or South America to avoid the Russians or the some European country like France/ that would seek revenge.

Mr Farrell also called out a number of names, German scientists who worked on classified Nazi projects, and Farrell claimed this people fled to Argentina( common knowledge again that has been known about since the early fifties and sixties) Eichmann just an example; was well Known Nazi who fled to South America and was later captured and abducted by agents working for the Israel Government. This part that is the most confusing, and I'm less than convinced. Mr Farrell is hinting with his own words that the Argentine government and those German Scientists who fled to Argentine worked in tangent and continued those projects that were unfinished because of Germany's defeat.

But I'll have to see more prove than calling out a few names. Documentation, Physical evidence, any evidence really that i would consider interesting. There is no record in the annals of history that would give credence to the notion that the Nazis had been testing or had been successful in creating a new form of energy or had successfully tested or designed a craft that could fly in the air for a considerable length of time and resembled a disc shape.

Mr Farrell claimed what pilot's saw over Europe when they were doing there bombing runs; the "Foo fighters" This was Nazi technology been deployed into the skies . If i am not mistaken most of the pilots described seeing balls of lights doing incredible speeds. I Can't believe in such a theory, that the Nazis had in their arsenal technology that would be able to do this in the 1940's.

As for Roswell; i remain skeptical about this being Nazi technology and i am less than convinced it was craft from another planet that crashed. I Think Mr Farrell is very much correct, the evidence for bodies the claims not evidence came later after the Roswell story was well known and publicised. I've no problem in believing, Nick Redfern theories that he publicised in his Book the "Body snatchers of the Desert" could be the right answer. We'll never get answers to this burning question; what happened at Roswell. So Rest in peace is my answer;

 

[Gene Steinberg]

We've had several requests to have Farrell on. I'm thinking about it.