NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

Reply to thread

Message

Just wanted to say THANK YOU CHRIS, for your unrelenting probing (pardon the pun) about why the FREE organization are using E.T. In their acronym. It was infuriating listening to Ray try and reconcile what the term ET meant to his organization when 9/10ths of the world see ET and compartmentalize it based on modern perception of the term which generally ends in a belittling of the subject or subject matter! I hope he does bring it up to the board because the woo woo train has left the station and ET is on it! The burning question that I had for Ray was " who proved any of these things were piloted by ET!!?? NO ONE HAS RAY!! That's why it's still a mystery. Beware the front load- you're absolutely right Chris, and Gene for that matter- this type of prejudged front loaded approach may just attract all those 'ascended to the fifth dimension masters' who would only have positive contacts 'in the dessert' (as fun as that may be), and skew the data right outta the gates!
With that small but MAJOR first and possibly fatal flaw ( based on their 0$ funding for the project) out of the way, I'd like to commend Ray, Ed, Rosemary, Leo, and all others for putting together such an elaborate and comprehensive questionnaire that may just glean some results for us and help us link together important clues as to what we're dealing with here.
The answer has eluded us so far (ie- since the beginning of recorded history) so don't expect a miracle.
Does this sound pessimistic? I apologize, but I'm tired of folks who have a very good head on their shoulders make ridiculous claims when the data is just not there. Especially when there's an opportunity to collect some very intriguing data. I do hope that Mr. Hernandez takes your advice and brings it up with the board about that acronym- no matter how they're trying to redefine ET- it will always mean alien to all who read it. Let's hope, Chris, that he takes your lovely idea of changing that E in FREE to Extraordinary.

<blockquote data-quote="Unified Field Canada" data-source="post: 226434" data-attributes="member: 7033">Just wanted to say THANK YOU CHRIS, for your unrelenting probing (pardon the pun) about why the FREE organization are using E.T. In their acronym. It was infuriating listening to Ray try and reconcile what the term ET meant to his organization when 9/10ths of the world see ET and compartmentalize it based on modern perception of the term which generally ends in a belittling of the subject or subject matter! I hope he does bring it up to the board because the woo woo train has left the station and ET is on it! The burning question that I had for Ray was &quot; who proved any of these things were piloted by ET!!?? NO ONE HAS RAY!! That&#039;s why it&#039;s still a mystery. Beware the front load- you&#039;re absolutely right Chris, and Gene for that matter- this type of prejudged front loaded approach may just attract all those &#039;ascended to the fifth dimension masters&#039; who would only have positive contacts &#039;in the dessert&#039; (as fun as that may be), and skew the data right outta the gates! With that small but MAJOR first and possibly fatal flaw ( based on their 0$ funding for the project) out of the way, I&#039;d like to commend Ray, Ed, Rosemary, Leo, and all others for putting together such an elaborate and comprehensive questionnaire that may just glean some results for us and help us link together important clues as to what we&#039;re dealing with here.The answer has eluded us so far (ie- since the beginning of recorded history) so don&#039;t expect a miracle. Does this sound pessimistic? I apologize, but I&#039;m tired of folks who have a very good head on their shoulders make ridiculous claims when the data is just not there. Especially when there&#039;s an opportunity to collect some very intriguing data. I do hope that Mr.&nbsp; Hernandez takes your advice and brings it up with the board about that acronym- no matter how they&#039;re trying to redefine ET- it will always mean alien to all who read it. Let&#039;s hope, Chris, that he takes your lovely idea of changing that E in FREE to Extraordinary.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Unified Field Canada, post: 226434, member: 7033"] Just wanted to say THANK YOU CHRIS, for your unrelenting probing (pardon the pun) about why the FREE organization are using E.T. In their acronym. It was infuriating listening to Ray try and reconcile what the term ET meant to his organization when 9/10ths of the world see ET and compartmentalize it based on modern perception of the term which generally ends in a belittling of the subject or subject matter! I hope he does bring it up to the board because the woo woo train has left the station and ET is on it! The burning question that I had for Ray was " who proved any of these things were piloted by ET!!?? NO ONE HAS RAY!! That's why it's still a mystery. Beware the front load- you're absolutely right Chris, and Gene for that matter- this type of prejudged front loaded approach may just attract all those 'ascended to the fifth dimension masters' who would only have positive contacts 'in the dessert' (as fun as that may be), and skew the data right outta the gates! With that small but MAJOR first and possibly fatal flaw ( based on their 0$ funding for the project) out of the way, I'd like to commend Ray, Ed, Rosemary, Leo, and all others for putting together such an elaborate and comprehensive questionnaire that may just glean some results for us and help us link together important clues as to what we're dealing with here. The answer has eluded us so far (ie- since the beginning of recorded history) so don't expect a miracle. Does this sound pessimistic? I apologize, but I'm tired of folks who have a very good head on their shoulders make ridiculous claims when the data is just not there. Especially when there's an opportunity to collect some very intriguing data. I do hope that Mr. Hernandez takes your advice and brings it up with the board about that acronym- no matter how they're trying to redefine ET- it will always mean alien to all who read it. Let's hope, Chris, that he takes your lovely idea of changing that E in FREE to Extraordinary. [/QUOTE]

Verification