NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

Reply to thread

Message

What's interesting about the FREE questionnaire is its scope and scale. Regardless of what one thinks about the miraculously healed dog or any of the very stunning visions Ray and his partner's side of the family have had, the study itself has great value. How it's interpreted or how space sweetness & brother light it is could be problematic. But at the very least they have a very detailed investigation of witnesses that runs many levels deep. It could provide a somewhat thorough look at one half or more of the equation when it comes to experiencing strange phenomenon. Focussing on who the witness is will drive ufology in better uncharted directions.
Is it all about aliens from their perspective - sure sounds like it. Is there a bunch of pseudoscience taking place amongst a bunch of doctorates - why not? At the very least their targeted data collection approach, that is availble in multiple languages for maximum possible responses, is all a strong stepping forward. Hopefully waves of this kind of data collection will continue in increasingly more rigorous manners, and there will be less confirmation up front that it's ET for those involved in the study. I suspect separating legitimate experiences with non-human intelligences from solely human generated experiences, or those in response to unknown external stimuli, will remain mostly impossible. It would be great if they make public the simple mass data results from the questionnaire.

<blockquote data-quote="Burnt State" data-source="post: 226436" data-attributes="member: 5332">What&#039;s interesting about the FREE questionnaire is its scope and scale.&nbsp; Regardless of what one thinks about the miraculously healed dog or any of the very stunning visions Ray and his partner&#039;s side of the family have had, the study itself has great value. How it&#039;s interpreted or how space sweetness &amp; brother light it is could be problematic. But at the very least they have a very detailed investigation of witnesses that runs many levels deep. It could provide a somewhat thorough look at one half or more of the equation when it comes to experiencing strange phenomenon. Focussing on who the witness is will drive ufology in better uncharted directions.<img src="http://www.swamij.com/images/whowitness.gif" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " data-size="" style="" />Is it all about aliens from their perspective - sure sounds like it. Is there a bunch of pseudoscience taking place amongst a bunch of doctorates - why not? At the very least their targeted data collection approach, that is availble in multiple languages for maximum possible responses, is all a strong stepping forward. Hopefully waves of this kind of data collection will continue in increasingly more rigorous manners, and there will be less confirmation up front that it&#039;s ET for those involved in the study. I suspect separating legitimate experiences with non-human intelligences from solely human generated experiences, or those in response to unknown external stimuli, will remain mostly impossible. It would be great if they make public the simple mass data results from the questionnaire.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Burnt State, post: 226436, member: 5332"] What's interesting about the FREE questionnaire is its scope and scale. Regardless of what one thinks about the miraculously healed dog or any of the very stunning visions Ray and his partner's side of the family have had, the study itself has great value. How it's interpreted or how space sweetness & brother light it is could be problematic. But at the very least they have a very detailed investigation of witnesses that runs many levels deep. It could provide a somewhat thorough look at one half or more of the equation when it comes to experiencing strange phenomenon. Focussing on who the witness is will drive ufology in better uncharted directions. [IMG]http://www.swamij.com/images/whowitness.gif[/IMG] Is it all about aliens from their perspective - sure sounds like it. Is there a bunch of pseudoscience taking place amongst a bunch of doctorates - why not? At the very least their targeted data collection approach, that is availble in multiple languages for maximum possible responses, is all a strong stepping forward. Hopefully waves of this kind of data collection will continue in increasingly more rigorous manners, and there will be less confirmation up front that it's ET for those involved in the study. I suspect separating legitimate experiences with non-human intelligences from solely human generated experiences, or those in response to unknown external stimuli, will remain mostly impossible. It would be great if they make public the simple mass data results from the questionnaire. [/QUOTE]

Verification