Sean Elifritz
Administrator
Great interview with Kevin Randle. He is always one of my favorite guests no matter what show he's on.
-
NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!
June 6, 2010 - Kevin D. Randle
- Thread starter Sean Elifritz
- Start date
Free episodes:
Hoffmeister
There is no spoon
can't wait to listen to this, Randle is always such a good guest
Kieran
Paranormal Adept
I personally, believe here, most if not all cases of alleged Disc and Saucer crashes in the 1940's or 1950's are fabricated hoaxes. But i still remain open minded to Roswell. Why on Earth would they have released a statement to the public and made a claim, they had found a Flying disc near some ranch, for a day, later to suddenly turn around and retract that statement and claim it was a ordinary weather balloon. I'm really puzzled by this unless it was indeed a mistake. In the reports their is a claim that MacBrazel rang the Base (no details)
But maybe he phoned or got word to the Roswell army base that an object maybe a UFO had crashed near his home Most UFO reports around this time were about people seeing discs and saucer type flying through the air and doing incredible speeds and sometimes marvellous Aerobatic manoeuvres were witnessed by these eyewitnesses in the sky. The burning question, for me is, When the Roswell Army base before they released that Statement in July 1947 to the public.."Who was was the person that confirmed it was a flying Disc.. Someone most have been senting information to the base from the location of the debris (the person in the field)? if was a mistake.. Was this statement released to the media on word of mouth only..this was an unconfirmed report?
I guess anything is possible (maybe it was a fuck up) like i said a mistake.
I often wonder about a certain aspect of the Roswell story. Were claims of bodies being seen or been found at the crashed site were alleged. Stanton Friedman (just to pick one Roswell researcher here)
If you know anything about his Works (books and stuff) The beings that always seem to be involved in the cases he has researched or wrote about are the Small humanoid beings (ET from OUTER SPACE)
So the question is, How many of the alleged Roswell witnesses were influenced by the books, that came later in the 1970's and 1980's? Hypothetically speaking.. If i saw a old video clip say from the late 1950's and one of these eyewitnesses claimed they saw small humanoid bodies then and back then. I would find that mighty interesting, however that never happened, the length of time, since the Roswell event and when these Eyewitnesses spoke out for the first time is a real problem for me.
I believe, we do need to look closely at the Nazi saucer program to explain these objects. I've seen some interesting Photos released by the Russians however there is no details in how successful these tests were. Maybe it was a project that was just at the starting faze but never got completed ( ending of the war) and the Allies captured these discs and have been flying these objects around for the last sixty years. Purpose well to fool into people into believing we are being visited by ET.
The disc or saucer craft might be a useless object for fighting wars but a great tool for fighting a disinformation war against your enemies. I'm not saying this is the case, but maybe, there is a reality here, that would to explain some of the reports of Disc and saucers in the past? I still believe there is a genuine phenomenon due to being a experiencer of the UFO phenomenon.
"I agree with Paul, Shag harbour incident might not have been a crash of a ET Craft? But i still remain open minded to it. If the Russians, Americas and Canadians were involved here, maybe it was a terrestrial space object of some kind, a manned capsule, gone of course? UFO Cases like Keckburg 1965 and Shag Harbour 1967 interest me due to the time proximity to the moon landings 1969.
The Russians and Americans were undoubtedly, testing stuff before, the moon landings occurred in 1969. So the're is always a possibility some secret project went hair wire here and maybe lives were lost, but these projects were never revealed due to the lost of life (no family members) needed to be contacted, they signed up as single men for a classified project. Highly speculative of course.
Something went into water but there is no reason to believe it was an Alien spacecraft. However there is a base close to were this UFO Went into the water, Then there is a high likelyhood of radar being used by the Base? So they probably tracked this object themselves without having to be notified by the public. Anyway just a few of the many thoughts i had concerning this weeks interview with Kevin Randall.
But maybe he phoned or got word to the Roswell army base that an object maybe a UFO had crashed near his home Most UFO reports around this time were about people seeing discs and saucer type flying through the air and doing incredible speeds and sometimes marvellous Aerobatic manoeuvres were witnessed by these eyewitnesses in the sky. The burning question, for me is, When the Roswell Army base before they released that Statement in July 1947 to the public.."Who was was the person that confirmed it was a flying Disc.. Someone most have been senting information to the base from the location of the debris (the person in the field)? if was a mistake.. Was this statement released to the media on word of mouth only..this was an unconfirmed report?
I guess anything is possible (maybe it was a fuck up) like i said a mistake.
I often wonder about a certain aspect of the Roswell story. Were claims of bodies being seen or been found at the crashed site were alleged. Stanton Friedman (just to pick one Roswell researcher here)
If you know anything about his Works (books and stuff) The beings that always seem to be involved in the cases he has researched or wrote about are the Small humanoid beings (ET from OUTER SPACE)
So the question is, How many of the alleged Roswell witnesses were influenced by the books, that came later in the 1970's and 1980's? Hypothetically speaking.. If i saw a old video clip say from the late 1950's and one of these eyewitnesses claimed they saw small humanoid bodies then and back then. I would find that mighty interesting, however that never happened, the length of time, since the Roswell event and when these Eyewitnesses spoke out for the first time is a real problem for me.
I believe, we do need to look closely at the Nazi saucer program to explain these objects. I've seen some interesting Photos released by the Russians however there is no details in how successful these tests were. Maybe it was a project that was just at the starting faze but never got completed ( ending of the war) and the Allies captured these discs and have been flying these objects around for the last sixty years. Purpose well to fool into people into believing we are being visited by ET.
The disc or saucer craft might be a useless object for fighting wars but a great tool for fighting a disinformation war against your enemies. I'm not saying this is the case, but maybe, there is a reality here, that would to explain some of the reports of Disc and saucers in the past? I still believe there is a genuine phenomenon due to being a experiencer of the UFO phenomenon.
"I agree with Paul, Shag harbour incident might not have been a crash of a ET Craft? But i still remain open minded to it. If the Russians, Americas and Canadians were involved here, maybe it was a terrestrial space object of some kind, a manned capsule, gone of course? UFO Cases like Keckburg 1965 and Shag Harbour 1967 interest me due to the time proximity to the moon landings 1969.
The Russians and Americans were undoubtedly, testing stuff before, the moon landings occurred in 1969. So the're is always a possibility some secret project went hair wire here and maybe lives were lost, but these projects were never revealed due to the lost of life (no family members) needed to be contacted, they signed up as single men for a classified project. Highly speculative of course.
Something went into water but there is no reason to believe it was an Alien spacecraft. However there is a base close to were this UFO Went into the water, Then there is a high likelyhood of radar being used by the Base? So they probably tracked this object themselves without having to be notified by the public. Anyway just a few of the many thoughts i had concerning this weeks interview with Kevin Randall.
Mike Chung
Paranormal Novice
It was a great show
ALPHA ROMEO UNIFORM
Whittingham
Hi Gene, Paul & Mr Kevin Randle,
Great show & thanks for asking the question guys and "blowfish' is a freaking nuisance while fishing and always never gives up.
Rockabilly time,
Blwfish
Great show & thanks for asking the question guys and "blowfish' is a freaking nuisance while fishing and always never gives up.
Rockabilly time,
Blwfish
trainedobserver
Paranormally Disenchanted
I reached total saturation on Roswell some time ago. I'd rather hear Randal talk about the more recent and heavily documented case of Gulf Breeze with Bruce Macabee in attendance.
Sean Elifritz
Administrator
He's already discussed that case pretty extensively years ago. He thinks it was a hoax, as do I.
trainedobserver
Paranormally Disenchanted
Although the quote you have there is Gene talking about some bumper music, I wouldn't doubt the Gulf Breeze thing has been whipped silly. In which paracasts is Gulf Breeze discussed? I finished two of Walters books recently and I have some respect for Maccabee's opinion.
marmer
Skilled Investigator
Yes, I would have liked to hear Kevin talk about Gulf Breeze, too, though I understand it's probably not really pertinent to the book under discussion. Was disappointed to hear no mention of Kecksburg, though I was glad to hear about the Cape Girardeau case. I think the "Flatwoods Monster" case deserves quite a bit more respect than it seems to and the dismissal of what I assume was Flatwoods researcher Frank Feschino's "Shoot them Down" book was a little premature. Stan Friedman, for one, finds him fairly credible, or at least he did on Binnall's show. I've actually heard about covered-up USAF dogfights in the early Cold War era here and there for years. Do I believe everything? No way. Do I believe there may be something there? Absolutely. Same with Flatwoods.
Capnkumquat
Skilled Investigator
Nice show.
I love the history given, the insight across multiple cases, and the depth and breadth of knowledge that the whole group lends to such a muddled topic. I enjoyed the whole thing...especially when the guests can disagree so cordially and reasonably, always acknowledging the inherent mystery of the topic.
Thanks for making the paranormal respectable...or as respectable as it can be.
"The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious." –Albert Einstein
I love the history given, the insight across multiple cases, and the depth and breadth of knowledge that the whole group lends to such a muddled topic. I enjoyed the whole thing...especially when the guests can disagree so cordially and reasonably, always acknowledging the inherent mystery of the topic.
Thanks for making the paranormal respectable...or as respectable as it can be.
"The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious." –Albert Einstein
Sean Elifritz
Administrator
Oops! Must have clicked the wrong thing. Gonna' fix it. I have quite a bit of respect for Maccabee as well but anyone can be wrong sometimes, especially in a field as convoluted as this one.
trainedobserver
Paranormally Disenchanted
I've read the books and listened Maccabee talk it about several times. I'm not convinced it was a hoax by a long shot. Having said that there are several elements in Ed's story that are very hard for me to ...rationalize ... however I wasn't there and Maccabee was.
Kandinsky
Curious Cat
I enjoyed the show a great deal and listened to Randle on Dark Matters again too. Listening to Randle interviews scrapes away my skepticism a little bit and revives the sense of mystery I felt years ago. As a kid it didn't seem unreasonable in any way that intelligent beings were visiting Earth's skies...seemed more unreasonable to think otherwise. In the past few days, I'm getting closer to that idea and a lot of it is thanks to this interview. Last week I was on the verge of taking a break from the subject.
As interviews go, it's made an impression on my current perspective on UFOs. That's pretty cool for an interview so good work Paracast and good work Kevin Randle! Thanks.
As interviews go, it's made an impression on my current perspective on UFOs. That's pretty cool for an interview so good work Paracast and good work Kevin Randle! Thanks.
davide
Skilled Investigator
That also got my attention. Feschino has done a lot of work on the Flatwoods incident and it seems to have a lot of credibility. I wish Paul would explain his reasoning. But the one thing that bothers me is the idea of an ET in a contraption spewing oil. (PS. be careful when discussing oil
).