Kelly Cahill Contact 1993

[Cosmic Ejaculator 1814]

Fascinating hour long interview with Kelly Cahill...

This is one of the most compelling abductee/contactee cases on record:

-Multiple independent witnesses (6)
-Landing traces left by the craft
-Physical markings on the witnesses

UFO Connection - Australia Encounter

 

[Tommy Allison]

If I had this hooked up to my TV, I'd run it in the background while I'm working today. I wish I had an hour to sit through this. It's an interesting case for sure. I've read up on this one and believe me it's just bizarre.

 

[Cosmic Ejaculator 1814]

If I had this hooked up to my TV, I'd run it in the background while I'm working today. I wish I had an hour to sit through this. It's an interesting case for sure. I've read up on this one and believe me it's just bizarre.

It's well worth watching,Tommy...
I'd love to see Steinberg & Biedny do an interview with her.She seems like the perfect paracast guest - educated,smart and cautious in her reporting...

 

[mike]

it is an excellent case, and the way the data was collected and treated is outstanding.

its interesting that one moment she was elated that such a wonderful thing could happen before her very eyes, then as if a switch was flicked the Fear kicks in, that and the rough handling that follows is very interesting data imo

 

[Gareth]

Yep I really want her to do a Paracast interview too. Mike did you say that you have some involvement with the Australian UFO community? You mentioned talking to Bill Chalker once I think?

Anyway it would be great to track Kelly down and get her on the Paracast.

 

[Noanswers]

I agree, she would make an excellent guest. CE passed this along to me a couple of weeks ago, and once again I found her story compelling and profound. Her character, from what we can see, seems to be beyond reproach.

CE and I have had a lot of success with tracking people down from the Ruwa case on Facebook. I'll do some digging and see if there are any connections there on the Cahill case.

 

[Cosmic Ejaculator 1814]

it is an excellent case, and the way the data was collected and treated is outstanding.

Yeah,that's what makes this such a standout case,IMO.Just the fact that the Universities got involved in the scientific investigation gives this case a lot more weight than most other 'contact' events.It would be cool if we could get Cahill to appear on the show,together with one of the scientists who studied the case...


I've searched the WWW,but can't seem find her contact info.Maybe some of the 'Aussies' on the forum could do a more 'pointed' search and track her down?I'd love to talk to her,even if G & D don't want her on the show...

 

[Kieran]

Interesting video just listening to the audio. Did she say this entitys were dark or the background was black no time to go back and listen?
I think she siad the entitys eyes turned red.

The African case you recently posted Cosmic have you noticed the entitys both described by kelly and the children at that school in Africa are "black" not "grey".

So different in colour to the typical grey and two different countries separated by thousands of miles. Craft seen that are black not in this particular cases,but this is very intrigueing.

 

[Cosmic Ejaculator 1814]

Interesting video just listening to the audio. Did she say this entitys were dark or the background was black no time to go back and listen?
I think she siad the entitys eyes turned red.

The African case you recently posted Cosmic have you noticed the entitys both described by kelly and the children at that school in Africa are "black" not "grey".

Irish,there are some similarities,but also distinct differences in the appearance of the beings...
The beings in the Ruwa,Zimbabwe case wore tight fitting black clothes,but their faces were 'greyish'.The beings in Cahill's experience were all black with red (glowing) eyes...
In this clip,which I have posted before,you can see a computer recreation of the 'aliens' and the craft...

 

[Kieran]

Irish,there are some similarities,but also distinct differences in the appearance of the beings...
The beings in the Ruwa,Zimbabwe case wore tight fitting black clothes,but their faces were 'greyish'.The beings in Cahill's experience were all black with red (glowing) eyes...
In this clip,which I have posted before,you can see a computer recreation of the 'aliens' and the craft...

No Cosmic listen again to the video you posted off google.The one were that ufologist lady interviewed the children.I never once heard grey been spoken!!!

All four children siad black man!! two siad the being was in shadow but was black!! with long hair one of the children actually siad the being looked like a hippy.

One of the children, a girl siad the entity was wearing a black suit, shiny in colour with big eyes she never siad the face was pale or grey.

I was just going on what the kids saw in this video.Reports of the face being grey or pale definately wasnt on that video.So what does that say to you?

 

[Gil Bavel]

Making notes while I'm viewing this... if it seems choppy, that's why...

This sounds like an awful lot like a MILAB abduction case... since when do aliens need to strap people's ankles down to a table leaving ligature marks?

Also, this is kind of odd--the three red spots in her case are all in a row, instead of a triangle, as in the "classic" abduction cases.

Cahill's creature by her bed had a cloak--Whitley Strieber mentions cloaked creatures quite a bit...

Man, this host is awful. She's an even worse interviewer than Larry King. Okay, maybe not that bad. But no sooner does she finish asking a question than she begins following up on it, I absolutely hate that.
And that, "Remember, Keep Looking Up!" at the end, isn't that Jack Horkheimer's tagline?

Well, I don't think this case is any more incredible than Leah's, or Katharina Wilson's or Karla Turner's, certainly--but it does add to the body of evidence of the phenomenon. And, why is Cahill's case so incredible, and Whitley Strieber's not? What makes people like Cahill any more believable than he? I mean, abductions accounts are pretty much the same aside from a few variations here and there--Strieber just had better recollection and was able to tell his story better, because he's a professional writer. But let's not forget that he was among the first--if he hadn't had the bravery to come forward, risking an already successful writing career, people like Cahill would still be stuck with the stigma of "crazy, nutjob, whacko" because he blazed the trail.
Maybe some wierder things happened to him than the others. Maybe there are some really even weirder things that happened to others we've never even heard about. But did his experiences last any longer than anyone else's?

I'm noticing some similarities between her case and Leah Haley's--including the weird electrical problems and the migraines--as well as the religious overtones. Cahill was a Pentecostal Christian, and Leah Haley was a pretty serious Southern Baptist... I wonder if there's a religious element to all these. Does anybody know, have any sworn atheists been abducted?

Karla Turner's "Into the Fringe" came out in 1992, a year before Cahill's book, and Leah Haley's "Lost Was the Key " came out in 1995, just two years later, as did Katharina Wilson's The Alien Jigsaw.

I'm noticing a pattern here that the lady authors seemed grouped together a bit. Coincidence, or is there more to it?

 

[Cosmic Ejaculator 1814]

Making notes while I'm viewing this... if it seems choppy, that's why...

This sounds like an awful lot like a MILAB abduction case... since when do aliens need to strap people's ankles down to a table leaving ligature marks?

Also, this is kind of odd--the three red spots in her case are all in a row, instead of a triangle, as in the "classic" abduction cases.

Cahill's creature by her bed had a cloak--Whitley Strieber mentions cloaked creatures quite a bit...

Man, this host is awful. She's an even worse interviewer than Larry King. Okay, maybe not that bad. But no sooner does she finish asking a question than she begins following up on it, I absolutely hate that.
And that, "Remember, Keep Looking Up!" at the end, isn't that Jack Horkheimer's tagline?

Well, I don't think this case is any more incredible than Leah's, or Katharina Wilson's or Karla Turner's, certainly--but it does add to the body of evidence of the phenomenon. And, why is Cahill's case so incredible, and Whitley Strieber's not? What makes people like Cahill any more believable than he? I mean, abductions accounts are pretty much the same aside from a few variations here and there--Strieber just had better recollection and was able to tell his story better, because he's a professional writer. But let's not forget that he was among the first--if he hadn't had the bravery to come forward, risking an already successful writing career, people like Cahill would still be stuck with the stigma of "crazy, nutjob, whacko" because he blazed the trail.
Maybe some wierder things happened to him than the others. Maybe there are some really even weirder things that happened to others we've never even heard about. But did his experiences last any longer than anyone else's?

I'm noticing some similarities between her case and Leah Haley's--including the weird electrical problems and the migraines--as well as the religious overtones. Cahill was a Pentecostal Christian, and Leah Haley was a pretty serious Southern Baptist... I wonder if there's a religious element to all these. Does anybody know, have any sworn atheists been abducted?

Karla Turner's "Into the Fringe" came out in 1992, a year before Cahill's book, and Leah Haley's "Lost Was the Key " came out in 1995, just two years later, as did Katharina Wilson's The Alien Jigsaw.

I'm noticing a pattern here that the lady authors seemed grouped together a bit. Coincidence, or is there more to it?

gilbavel,you raise a lot of interesting points in the post above and I'm not really sure where to begin...

As far as this being a MILAB case,I have some problems accepting that.Can you point me to another MILAB where this type of 'alien' was involved? I don't think I've ever seen this 'phenotype' reported before.

I don't know the cases you refer to well enough to have an informed opinon of them,but are you saying that they all have the same level of corroboration - in terms of physical evidence - as the Cahill encounter?We're talking 6 witnesses,landing traces,markings on 4 of the witnesses etc...
The case also seems to have been investigated in a more proffesional manner than most abduction reports.This adds too the overall quality of the case,IMO.

(I'm gonna try to familiarize myself with the cases you mentioned above,so I can respond more presicely the next time).

 

[Cosmic Ejaculator 1814]

A very fascinating article (by Bill Chalker) which sheds further light on this classic case;


The Kelly Cahill Story