Kentucky Bigfoot

[jkoci]

Some wonder if mysterious image in picture is Big Foot - WAVE 3 TV Louisville, KY |

 

[jkoci]

 

[MrChud]

Ahhh the elusive Blobsquatch strikes again!

 

[jkoci]

Ahhh the elusive Blobsquatch strikes again!

I like the garbage bag possibilty best.

 

[Xylo]

Looks like a dark colored orang to me. I doubt it's 7 feet tall however.

 

[thefoundryman]

Looks like a dark colored orang to me. I doubt it's 7 feet tall however.

Could be an Orangutan, but in Jefferson County?
After seeing the vid, the landowner clearly demonstrates that he is 5'9" and also about as tall as the yellow flowers in front of the 'squatch'. I don't think 7' is out of the question here Xylo.

As for Sasquatch, it's just a matter of time before a game-trail cam gets a photo that is so clear, it will be undeniable that a large ape-like creature does indeed roam the woodlands of this earth in secrecy. That's my $0.02.

 

[SarkozyAide]

It's a crow flying towards the camera. It's another one of those tricky bits that as soon as you see it with the word "crow" in your mind, you can't NOT see it.

 

[Stagger]

Kentucky Bigfoot?

Is there a fried version already??

 

[jkoci]

It's a crow flying towards the camera. It's another one of those tricky bits that as soon as you see it with the word "crow" in your mind, you can't NOT see it.

You could be right. Good call.

 

[Xylo]

It's a crow flying towards the camera. It's another one of those tricky bits that as soon as you see it with the word "crow" in your mind, you can't NOT see it.

That's one HELLUVA big crow then...and I don't want to be around when it shits!

 

[thefoundryman]

It's a crow flying towards the camera. It's another one of those tricky bits that as soon as you see it with the word "crow" in your mind, you can't NOT see it.

Nope, Had to draw the human figure way to many times, it's definitely hominid shaped, sitting position. Look at the shadow, as opposed to the direction of the light source, head slightly forward, arms out slightly, and the kicker for me is the vegetation in front of the figure, which would not be visible in front of an in-flight crow.

Bottom line is, if it needs defending, It's not really incontravertible evidence.
I am certain that more, and better quality, trail-cam evidence in the next two years may yield some smoking gun proof.

In the end, we may need a corpse to put this in the realm of non-fiction.

 

[TClaeys]

I am certain that more, and better quality, trail-cam evidence in the next two years may yield some smoking gun proof.

In the end, we may need a corpse to put this in the realm of non-fiction.

We will need a body, no doubt. But I don't know why we would expect proof in the next 2 years when we haven't had anything in the last 40. People look for this thing yet never come up with anything other than blurry photos like this one. With an ape-like thing sitting there we might have expected a better picture. I can't tell what it is.

Where is the follow up?? Footprints?? Damaged vegetation?? Hair?? Poo?? If a bigfoot was sitting there might it not have left some other clues??

 

[SarkozyAide]

Nope, Had to draw the human figure way to many times, it's definitely hominid shaped, sitting position. Look at the shadow, as opposed to the direction of the light source, head slightly forward, arms out slightly, and the kicker for me is the vegetation in front of the figure, which would not be visible in front of an in-flight crow.

Bottom line is, if it needs defending, It's not really incontravertible evidence.
I am certain that more, and better quality, trail-cam evidence in the next two years may yield some smoking gun proof.

In the end, we may need a corpse to put this in the realm of non-fiction.

Look again. The "vegetation in front of the figure" is actually the feathers of the wingtips. I have no doubt that there is in fact a large North American ape currently unknown to science, but this ain't it. Not by a long shot. Look at it again while thinking "crow...crow...crow..." you'll see it.

 

[thefoundryman]

We will need a body, no doubt. But I don't know why we would expect proof in the next 2 years when we haven't had anything in the last 40.

Technology exceeding former human limitations. Simply put, we haven't had automated, mass produced trail cams until now.

For anyone that doesn't know, a trail-camera is a remote camera, often left in a location and when triggered by movement, it snaps a shot.
Hunters use them to track prey, and with the ever increasing affordability of these things, a wider and wider array of them is deployed every year.
I'm just saying that I think it highly likely that some really compelling evidence is forthcoming because of this trail-cam revolution in hunting practices is conducive to increasing chances of a Squatch being captured on film imminently.

 

[skunkape]

For anyone that doesn't know, a trail-camera is a remote camera, often left in a location and when triggered by movement, it snaps a shot.

I'm still waiting for someone to market one with a remote control gun so I can hunt from my lap-top.
<input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"><!--Session data--><input onclick="jsCall();" id="jsProxy" type="hidden">