Micheal Salla gets duped again.

[Skymon876]

Good god what a bamboozling idiot. The Theilman story was not enough for Salla to give up this U.N. ambassador bull*t. Now another U.N. space brother ambassador was hoaxed and YET DR. SALLA IS TRYING TO STILL SAY ITS TRUE

THATS 2 UN hoaxes that SALLA got duped by:shy:


http://news.exopoliticsinstitute.org/index.php/archives/573

 

[Kandinsky]

The Exo guys and associates have an almost perfect 'hit rate' for presenting BS and supporting hoaxes and hoaxers. I say 'almost' only because I haven't read everything they've published yet.

If a broken watch is right twice a day...why can't Exopolitics be right once a year? How can a collection of intelligent and educated people defy the odds and consistently be wrong? The odds against being wrong so often are astronomical unless there's something more to their activities...

Any average fan of UFO lore and research will pick a few cases that they see as being persuasive. In that small group of cases, at least one would stand scrutiny and be supported by other like-minded guys. Maybe an RB-47 or Belgian Triangle case? Likewise, we all have particular researchers we favour or that appeal to our way of thinking. Maybe Jerry Clark or Dr Haines?

Somehow, perversely, the Exo guys will cite Bob Dean, Corso or an identified NASA image of a rocket stage as their 'best evidence.' We're all wrong some of the time...I believed the Meier case in my teens and a recent case has raised big doubts too.

It's impossible, in my opinion, to be so wrong, so often and so confidently. It's as if there's intent there and why would there be?

 

[trainedobserver]

It's impossible, in my opinion, to be so wrong, so often and so confidently. It's as if there's intent there and why would there be?

I think you make an excellent point.