NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

Reply to thread

Message

I enjoyed the show, however, there were things I was irritated by... The greatest of those things was that David Paulides would never say how many people have gone missing, and the information isn't available on the canammissing site either... I can understand his not wanting to speculate because the speculation would draw attention away from those who've gone missing, but isn't speculation the only way we're going to figure things out? After all if you don't speculate, you can't derive a theory (even if it's wrong). Also I found it irritating that David would just flat out not answer questions and continue on with what he was saying.

Don't get me wrong, the reason I was irritated is because this is a fascinating subject and one worthy of learning more about. Even with my irritations, I still very much enjoyed the show. I would be interested in hearing more about this in the future, maybe with some more answers next time.

Peace out...

<blockquote data-quote="inc0gneato" data-source="post: 148540" data-attributes="member: 1695">I enjoyed the show, however, there were things I was irritated by... The greatest of those things was that David Paulides would never say how many people have gone missing, and the information isn&#039;t available on the canammissing site either... I can understand his not wanting to speculate because the speculation would draw attention away from those who&#039;ve gone missing, but isn&#039;t speculation the only way we&#039;re going to figure things out? After all if you don&#039;t speculate, you can&#039;t derive a theory (even if it&#039;s wrong).&nbsp; Also I found it irritating that David would just flat out not answer questions and continue on with what he was saying.&nbsp;Don&#039;t get me wrong, the reason I was irritated is because this is a fascinating subject and one worthy of learning more about. Even with my irritations, I still very much enjoyed the show. I would be interested in hearing more about this in the future, maybe with some more answers next time.&nbsp;Peace out... <img src="/forum/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/smile.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="inc0gneato, post: 148540, member: 1695"] I enjoyed the show, however, there were things I was irritated by... The greatest of those things was that David Paulides would never say how many people have gone missing, and the information isn't available on the canammissing site either... I can understand his not wanting to speculate because the speculation would draw attention away from those who've gone missing, but isn't speculation the only way we're going to figure things out? After all if you don't speculate, you can't derive a theory (even if it's wrong). Also I found it irritating that David would just flat out not answer questions and continue on with what he was saying. Don't get me wrong, the reason I was irritated is because this is a fascinating subject and one worthy of learning more about. Even with my irritations, I still very much enjoyed the show. I would be interested in hearing more about this in the future, maybe with some more answers next time. Peace out... :) [/QUOTE]

Verification