• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

NASA Unveils New Detailed Photos

Forums New posts

Free episodes:

You would hope this will be enough to squelch the "we didn't go to the moon" noise, but you know it won't. There will still be people going on about that nonsense no matter what.
 
makes a bit of a mockery about there being other life on the moon, surely if there was they would of moseyed on over for a look at what we left behind by now, no tracks to show it.
 
An inconvenient question-and the Achilles heel of the whole debate. If Vito Saccheri is telling the truth, you have your answer. Again I say, this is the chink in the armor we should address loudly, repeatedly, until we get a response-even if they refuse, they reinforce the FACT that they are hiding something. if they say it is an issue of NATIONAL SECURITY, we have them by the short hairs. Their own data on the camera capabilities point to a withholding of information, since they stonewall all attempts to acquire photos that match the capability of the hardware. Even the photos posted by TO remain farther away than the capability inherent in the camera specs. But if ALL the lunar photos were released at the same resolution as these, we could put many questions to rest one way or another. SO..why don't they? They MUST be hiding something(s). This makes it the one area that does not require speculation, it depends on known facts.
 
Who says that following a long line of link doesn't pay some dividends.

The following link, while most likely devoid of any images we want to see, is at least a conduit to getting some HiRes images.


http://lroc.sese.asu.edu/data/LRO-L-LROC-5-RDR-V1.0/

---------- Post added at 05:40 AM ---------- Previous post was at 05:18 AM ----------

If you go here, look at the Narrow Angle Camera stuff here. [h=1]data/LRO-L-LROC-5-RDR-V1.0/LROLRC_1001/EXTRAS/BROWSE/NAC_DTM[/h]Just a warning though, some of these files are freaking huge. Also, read the txt, and pdf files scattered throughout the many directories. The .tab files will import into excell and tell you things like lat and long and common feature names. If nothing else, this give us a snapshot into their conventions for naming, storing, and disseminating data.
 
Ron, I just chose the first image and its STILL downloading after almost 45 minutes! Perhaps that's why we have so few! I'm curious to see what it is. This could take months...thanks, Rich
 
bbridges said:
Ron, I just chose the first image and its STILL downloading after almost 45 minutes! Perhaps that's why we have so few! I'm curious to see what it is. This could take months...thanks, Rich
Click to expand...

i have used this site before. you want to download the lo res first, then if you like it go for the larger files.
 
I took the pics on a laptop to a guy who beleves we never went to the moon. the gentleman looked at them and asked "Did a NASA satalite take these?" I said yes. he then closed the laptop and said "FAKED PHOTOSHOPED" he told me he would run the pics thu a layering program (what ever that is) and remove all the inseted images he also demanded to see the raw footage... SOME PPL WILL NEVER GIVE UP EVEN WHEN FACED WITH THE TRUTH!
 
Back
Top