NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

Reply to thread

Message

An inconvenient question-and the Achilles heel of the whole debate. If Vito Saccheri is telling the truth, you have your answer. Again I say, this is the chink in the armor we should address loudly, repeatedly, until we get a response-even if they refuse, they reinforce the FACT that they are hiding something. if they say it is an issue of NATIONAL SECURITY, we have them by the short hairs. Their own data on the camera capabilities point to a withholding of information, since they stonewall all attempts to acquire photos that match the capability of the hardware. Even the photos posted by TO remain farther away than the capability inherent in the camera specs. But if ALL the lunar photos were released at the same resolution as these, we could put many questions to rest one way or another. SO..why don't they? They MUST be hiding something(s). This makes it the one area that does not require speculation, it depends on known facts.

<blockquote data-quote="bbridges" data-source="post: 118622" data-attributes="member: 2322"><p>An inconvenient question-and the Achilles heel of the whole debate. If&nbsp; Vito Saccheri is telling the truth, you have your answer. Again I say, this is the chink in the armor we should address loudly, repeatedly, until we get a response-even if they refuse, they reinforce the FACT that they are hiding something. if they say it is an issue of&nbsp; NATIONAL SECURITY, we have them by the short hairs. Their own data on the camera capabilities point to a withholding of information, since they stonewall all attempts to acquire photos that match the capability of the hardware. Even the photos posted by TO remain farther away than the capability inherent in the camera specs. But if ALL the lunar photos were released at the same resolution as these, we could put many questions to rest one way or another. SO..why don&#039;t they? They MUST be hiding something(s). This makes it the one area that does not require speculation, it depends on known facts.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="bbridges, post: 118622, member: 2322"] An inconvenient question-and the Achilles heel of the whole debate. If Vito Saccheri is telling the truth, you have your answer. Again I say, this is the chink in the armor we should address loudly, repeatedly, until we get a response-even if they refuse, they reinforce the FACT that they are hiding something. if they say it is an issue of NATIONAL SECURITY, we have them by the short hairs. Their own data on the camera capabilities point to a withholding of information, since they stonewall all attempts to acquire photos that match the capability of the hardware. Even the photos posted by TO remain farther away than the capability inherent in the camera specs. But if ALL the lunar photos were released at the same resolution as these, we could put many questions to rest one way or another. SO..why don't they? They MUST be hiding something(s). This makes it the one area that does not require speculation, it depends on known facts. [/QUOTE]

Verification