NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!
NASA's Alien Anomalies caught on film
http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/images/station/crew-7/html/iss007e06886.htmlISS007-E-06886 (12 June 2003) --- This image was taken by Expedition 7 NASA ISS Science Officer Ed Lu from the U.S. Destiny Laboratory window. Lu noticed the object floating away from the Station and described it as a 5 centimeter long piece of metal. Station managers and flight controllers estimate that the mass of the object will cause it to de-orbit rapidly and will not cause damage to the Station. Engineers are analyzing the imagery to determine what the object is and where it might have originated. It is likely the object came from the Station because of its similar speed and orbit relative to the Station.
LOL! I am really glad you used that quote by Einstein in your signature file, because in this situation, anyone believing that any of this crap is anything more than space dust, particle material and rock really needs that "imagination" he places over "knowledge.".....
Like anything in this field, it pays to double-check sources and get on the due diligence bus.
ego utor vita. ego reputo ego mos utor nex magis
Whether you let Jim Oberg or Don Ecker or anyone know anything, it still does little to show any real evidence of anything more than simple space debris, frozen ice or a dozen other natural possibilities.
Malo eternus vita.
I'll let you know when I know for sure. The sphere isn't in the catalogue shots, but it looks like video and the main source for 'NASA anomaly' footage is Martyn Stubbs. Using critical thinking, the absence of a sphere in photos combined with the 'balls-out' extraordinary footage makes me very doubtful that it's legit.Kandinsky. Can you tell me if the footage @ 2.16 has been thoroughly debunked or not?
In your opinion. Luckily, for me, I have decided that your opinion is just that,"yours" and you are welcome to it. When you can prove to me successfully that every single piece of footage shown is , as you say, "simple space debris, frozen ice or a dozen other natural possibilities" then your opinion may sway me. Until then "spero vestri deus utor vestri vexillum"
meus vita est unus of plures ego expertus
I just feel that instead of presenting this information with the confirmation that they are, "alien", it was necessary to expose the word usage as that of alien as in, "foreign" and not "intelligent extra-terrestrial", as neither of us have any confirmation to it being an intelligent extra-terrestrial in origin.
The footage may be a Martyn Stubbs collection but the footage was taken by NASA.